Cited by 13Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Enriched laboratory housing increases sensitivity to social stress in female California mice (Peromyscus californicus)

Open access
Minie, Vanessa A., Petric, Radmila, Ramos-Maciel, Stephanie, Wright, Emily C., Trainor, Brian C., Duque-Wilckens, Natalia·2021·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

Domesticated mice and rats have shown to be powerful model systems for biomedical research, but there are cases in which the biology of species is a poor match for the hypotheses under study. The California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) has unique traits that make it an ideal model for studying biological mechanisms underlying human-relevant behaviors such as intra-female aggression, biparental care, and monogamy. Indeed, peer-reviewed scientific publications using California mouse as a model for behavioral research have more than doubled in the past decade. Critically, behavioral outcomes in captive animals can be profoundly affected by housing conditions, but there is very limited knowledge regarding species-specific housing needs in California mice. Currently, California mouse investigators have to rely on guidelines aimed for more common laboratory species that show vastly different physiology, behavior, and/or ecological niche. This not only could be suboptimal for animals' welfare, but also result in lack of standardization that could potentially compromise experimental reproducibility and replicability across laboratories. With the aim of assessing how different housing systems can affect California mouse behavior both in the home cage as well as the open field and social interaction tests before and after social defeat stress, here we tested three different caging systems: 1. Standard mouse cage, 2. Large cage, and 3. Large cage + environmental enrichment (EE), which focused on increasing vertical complexity based on observations that California mice are semiarboreal in the wild. We found that the effects of housing were largely sex specific: compared to standard cages, in females large + EE reduced home cage stereotypic-like backflipping and rearing behaviors, while large cage increased social interactions. In males, the large+EE cage reduced rearing and digging but did not significantly affect backflipping behavior. Interestingly, while there were no significant differences in the open field and social interaction pre-stress behaviors, large and large+EE housing increased the sensitivity of these tests to detect stress induced phenotypes in females. Together, these results suggest that increasing social and environmental complexity affects home cage behaviors in male and female California mice without interfering with, but rather increasing the magnitude of, the effects of defeat stress on the open field and social interaction tests.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105381

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This within-subjects design produces behavioral effects similar to the between-subjects design used for males.

    “This within-subjects design produces behavioral effects similar to the between-subjects design used for males (112).”

    From Sexual differentiation of neural mechanisms of stress sensitivity during puberty (2023) · cites this paper as [112]

    The Statistical analyses section describes repeated-measures tests with each animal as a matched set, and the Results report behavioral effects in males and females. Neither section compares a within-subjects design with a between-subjects design used for males or says the two produce similar effects (searched for both design terms and social-defeat comparisons). No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S, 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1– 48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baumans V, 2005. Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Rodents and Rabbits: Requirements of Rodents, Rabbits, and Research. ILAR J 46, 162– 170. 10.1093/ilar.46.2.162 15775025 · DOI
  3. Bayne K, 2018. Environmental enrichment and mouse models: Current perspectives. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine 1, 82– 90. 10.1002/ame2.12015 30891552 PMC6388067 · DOI
  4. Bayne K, Würbel H, 2014. The impact of environmental enrichment on the outcome variability and scientific validity of laboratory animal studies. Rev. - Off. Int. Epizoot 33, 273– 280. 25000800
  5. Bechard AR, Cacodcar N, King MA, Lewis MH, 2016. How does environmental enrichment reduce repetitive motor behaviors? Neuronal activation and dendritic morphology in the indirect basal ganglia pathway of a mouse model. Behav Brain Res 299, 122– 131. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.11.029 26620495 PMC4696878 · DOI
  6. Dalquest WW, 1974. Factors Influencing the Local Distribution of Peromyscus californicus in Northern California. J Mammal 55, 102– 114. 10.2307/1379260 · DOI
  7. Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Réale D, Wright J, 2010. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 81– 89. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.013 19748700 · DOI
  8. Friske JE, Gammie SC, 2005. Environmental enrichment alters plus maze, but not maternal defense performance in mice. Physiol Behav 85, 187– 194. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.03.022 15894343 · DOI
  9. Garner JP, Mason GJ, 2002. Evidence for a relationship between cage stereotypies and behavioural disinhibition in laboratory rodents. Behav. Brain Res 136, 83– 92. 12385793
  10. Gelman A, Hill J, 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Gleason ED, Holschbach MA, Marler CA, 2012. Compatibility drives female preference and reproductive success in the monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) more strongly than male testosterone measures. Horm Behav 61, 100– 107. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.10.009 22101260 PMC5971113 · DOI
  12. Greenberg GD, Laman-Maharg A, Campi KL, Voigt H, Orr VN, Schaal L, Trainor BC, 2014. Sex differences in stress-induced social withdrawal: role of brain derived neurotrophic factor in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Front Behav Neurosci 7, 223. 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00223 24409132 PMC3885825 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gross AN, Richter SH, Engel AKJ, Würbel H, 2012. Cage-induced stereotypies, perseveration and the effects of environmental enrichment in laboratory mice. Behavioural Brain Research 234, 61– 68. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.06.007 22721674 · DOI
  14. Gubernick DJ, 1988. Reproduction in the California Mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Journal of Mammalogy 69, 857– 860. 10.2307/1381649 · DOI
  15. Gubernick DJ, Alberts JR, 1987. The biparental care system of the California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. J Comp Psychol 101, 169– 177. 3608423
  16. Gubernick DJ, Nordby JC, 1992. Parental influences on female puberty in the monogamous California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Animal Behaviour 44, 259– 267. 10.1016/0003-3472(92)90032-5 · DOI
  17. Hadley C, Hadley B, Ephraim S, Yang M, Lewis MH, 2006. Spontaneous stereotypy and environmental enrichment in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus): Reversibility of experience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 312– 322. 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.08.006 · DOI
  18. Iñiguez SD, Flores-Ramirez FJ, Riggs LM, Alipio JB, Garcia-Carachure I, Hernandez MA, Sanchez DO, Lobo MK, Serrano PA, Braren SH, Castillo SA, 2018. Vicarious Social Defeat Stress Induces Depression-Related Outcomes in Female Mice. Biological Psychiatry, Novel Mechanisms of Antidepressant Action 83, 9– 17. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.07.014 PMC5730407 28888327 · DOI
  19. Johnson SA, Painter MS, Javurek AB, Murphy CR, Howald EC, Khan ZZ, Conard CM, Gant KL, Ellersieck MR, Hoffmann F, Schenk AK, Rosenfeld CS, 2017. Characterization of vocalizations emitted in isolation by California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) pups throughout the postnatal period. J Comp Psychol 131, 30– 39. 10.1037/com0000057 28182483 PMC5310764 · DOI
  20. Kleiman DG, 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Q Rev Biol 52, 39– 69. 10.1086/409721 857268 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kleiman DG, Malcolm JR, 1981. The Evolution of Male Parental Investment in Mammals, in: Gubernick DJ, Klopfer PH (), Parental Care in Mammals. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 347– 387. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3150-6_9 · DOI
  22. Krugner-Higby L, Shelness GS, Holler A, 2006. Heritable, diet-induced hyperlipidemia in California mice (Peromyscus californicus) is due to increased hepatic secretion of very low density lipoprotein triacylglycerol. Comp. Med 56, 468– 475. 17219776
  23. Laredo SA, Steinman MQ, Robles CF, Ferrer E, Ragen BJ, Trainor BC, 2015. Effects of defeat stress on behavioral flexibility in males and females: modulation by the mu-opioid receptor. Eur. J. Neurosci 41, 434– 441. 10.1111/ejn.12824 25615538 PMC4331223 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lehmann ML, Herkenham M, 2011. Environmental Enrichment Confers Stress Resiliency to Social Defeat through an Infralimbic Cortex-Dependent Neuroanatomical Pathway. J Neurosci 31, 6159– 6173. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0577-11.2011 21508240 PMC3094574 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Marten CG, 1973. Time Patterns of Peromyscus Activity and Their Correlations with Weather. Journal of Mammalogy 54, 169– 188. 10.2307/1378878 · DOI
  26. Martin JGA, Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Réale D, 2011. Measuring individual differences in reaction norms in field and experimental studies: a power analysis of random regression models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2, 362– 374. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00084.x · DOI
  27. National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 2011. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed, The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC).
  28. Novak J, Bailoo JD, Melotti L, Würbel H, 2016. Effect of Cage-Induced Stereotypies on Measures of Affective State and Recurrent Perseveration in CD-1 and C57BL/6 Mice. PLoS One 11 10.1371/journal.pone.0153203 PMC4856387 27145080 · DOI
  29. Olsson IAS, Sherwin CM, 2006. Behaviour of laboratory mice in different housing conditions when allowed to self-administer an anxiolytic. Lab Anim 40, 392– 399. 10.1258/002367706778476389 17018210 · DOI
  30. Panti-May JA, Carvalho-Pereira TSA, Serrano S, Pedra GG, Taylor J, Pertile AC, Minter A, Airam V, Carvalho M, Júnior NN, Rodrigues G, Reis MG, Ko AI, Childs JE, Begon M, Costa F, 2016. A Two-Year Ecological Study of Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a Brazilian Urban Slum. PLOS ONE 11, e0152511. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152511 27015422 PMC4807843 · DOI
  31. Provencio I, Foster RG, 1995. Circadian rhythms in mice can be regulated by photoreceptors with cone-like characteristics. Brain Res. 694, 183– 190. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00694-l 8974643 · DOI
  32. Ribble DO, Salvioni M, 1990. Social organization and nest co-occupancy in Peromyscus californicus, a monogamous rodent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26, 9– 15. 10.1007/BF00174020 · DOI
  33. Rieger NS, Stanton EH, Marler CA, 2019. Division of labour in territorial defence and pup retrieval by pair-bonded California mice, Peromyscus californicus. Anim. Behav 156, 67– 78. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.05.023 · DOI
  34. Schloesser RJ, Lehmann M, Martinowich K, Manji HK, Herkenham M, 2010. Environmental enrichment requires adult neurogenesis to facilitate the recovery from psychosocial stress. Mol Psychiatry 15, 1152– 1163. 10.1038/mp.2010.34 20308988 PMC2990187 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Seibenhener ML, Wooten MC, 2015. Use of the Open Field Maze to Measure Locomotor and Anxiety-like Behavior in Mice. J Vis Exp 10.3791/52434 PMC4354627 25742564 · DOI
  36. Shyne A, 2006. Meta-analytic review of the effects of enrichment on stereotypic behavior in zoo mammals. Zoo Biology 25, 317– 337. 10.1002/zoo.20091 · DOI
  37. Singleton GR, Hay DA, 1983. The effect of social organization on reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of wild house mice, Mus musculus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12, 49– 56. 10.1007/BF00296932 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Trainor BC, Pride MC, Villalon Landeros R, Knoblauch NW, Takahashi EY, Silva AL, Crean KK, 2011. Sex differences in social interaction behavior following social defeat stress in the monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus). PLoS ONE 6, e17405. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017405 21364768 PMC3045459 · DOI · Paper page
  39. van Dellen A, Blakemore C, Deacon R, York D, Hannan AJ, 2000. Delaying the onset of Huntington’s in mice. Nature 404, 721– 722. 10.1038/35008142 10783874 · DOI
  40. Wiedenmayer C, 1997. Causation of the ontogenetic development of stereotypic digging in gerbils. Animal Behaviour 53, 461– 470. 10.1006/anbe.1996.0296 · DOI
  41. Williams AV, Laman-Maharg A, Armstrong CV, Ramos-Maciel S, Minie VA, Trainor BC, 2018. Acute inhibition of kappa opioid receptors before stress blocks depression-like behaviors in California mice. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 86, 166– 174. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.06.001 29879438 PMC6054130 · DOI
  42. Wright EC, Culkin HI, Sekar S, Kapoor A, Corbett C, Trainor BC, 2020. Pubertal Androgens Reduce the Effects of Social Stress on Anxiety-related Behaviors in California Mice. bioRxiv. 2020.12.02.408526 10.1101/2020.12.02.408526 · DOI
  43. Yoshimura T, Ebihara S, 1996. Spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors mediating phase-shifts of circadian rhythms in retinally degenerate CBA/J (rd/rd) and normal CBA/N (+/+) mice. J Comp Physiol A 178. 10.1007/BF00225828 8667293 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minie, V. A., Petric, R., Ramos-Maciel, S., Wright, E. C., Trainor, B. C., & Duque-Wilckens, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
241
Pages
105381
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175994430
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF
  • American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
  • National Science Foundation (IOS 1937335)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01MH121829)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
California mouse, Peromyscus californicus, environmental enrichment, laboratory housing, social defeat stress, sex differences, stereotypy, home cage behavior, social interaction, open field behavior, animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review