The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Air-side thermal hydraulic performance of offset strip fin aluminum heat exchangers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discrepancy shown by using Dong et al. correlations is because the geometrical ratio s/h is about 0.47, which is out of the correlation limitations (s/h < 0.34).
“The discrepancy shown by using Dong et al. [86] correlations is because the geometrical ratio s/h is about 0.47, which is out of the correlation limitations ( s/h < 0.34).”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [86]
Regardless of the disagreement, the f- and j-factor for Dong et al. correlations at high Re values show acceptable matching with the experimental data.
“Regardless of this disagreement, the f - and j -factor, at high Re values, show an acceptable matching with the experimental data.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [86]
A generalized j- and f-factor correlation formulated by Yang and Li using numerical simulation of 55 strip-fin cores was in excellent agreement with experimental data.
“A generalized j - and f - factor correlations were recently formulated [89] by using numerical simulation by testing 55 strip-fin cores; the results were in excellent agreement with those of experimental data [40, 86, 90].”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Wieting, 1975, Empirical correlation for heat transfer and flow friction characteristics of rectangular offset-fin plate-fin heat exchangers, J. Heat Transfer, 97, 488, 10.1115/1.3450412 · DOI · Paper page
- Jpshi, 1987, Heat transfer and friction in the offset strip-fin heat exchangers, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 30, 69, 10.1016/0017-9310(87)90061-5 · DOI
- Mochizuki, 1987, Transport Phenomena in stacks of interrupt parallel-plate surface, Exp. Heat transfer, 1, 127, 10.1080/08916158708946336 · DOI · Paper page
- Manglik, 1995, Heat transfer and pressure drop correlations for the rectangular offset strip fin compact heat exchanger, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 10, 171, 10.1016/0894-1777(94)00096-Q · DOI · Paper page
- Bae, 1999, Local flow and heat transfer of a 2-row offset strip fin-tube heat exchanger, J. Enhanced Heat Transfer, 6, 13, 10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v6.i1.20 · DOI
- Hu, 1995, Prandtl number effect on offset fin heat exchanger performance: experimental result, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 38, 1053, 10.1016/0017-9310(94)00220-P · DOI
- DeJong, 1998, Complementary experimental and numerical study of the flow and heat transfer in offset strip-fin heat exchangers, J. Heat Transfer, Trans. ASME, 120, 690, 10.1115/1.2824338 · DOI · Paper page
- Muzychka, 2001, Modeling the f and j characteristics for transverse flow through an offset strip fin at low Reynolds number, J. Enhanced Heat Transfer, 8, 243, 10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v8.i4.30 · DOI
- Saidi, 2001, A numerical investigation of heat transfer enhancement in offset strip fin heat exchangers in self-sustained oscillatory flows, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 11, 699, 10.1108/EUM0000000005984 · DOI
- Wang, 2000, Data reduction for air-side performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 21, 218, 10.1016/S0894-1777(00)00005-4 · DOI
- Gnielinski, 1976, New equation for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow, Int. Chemical Eng., 16, 359
- Moffat, 1988, Describing the uncertainties in experiment results, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 1, 3, 10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X · DOI · Paper page
- Chang, 1997, A generalized heat transfer correlation for louver fin geometry, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 40, 533, 10.1016/0017-9310(96)00116-0 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qasem, N. A. A., & Zubair, S. M. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.104 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, J., Chen, J., Chen, Z., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Dong, Junqi
- Venue
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 306-313
- ISSN
- 1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970742706
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Keywords
- offset strip fins, aluminum heat exchangers, air-side heat transfer, pressure drop, fin geometry, fin spacing, fin height, fin length, Colburn j-factor, Fanning friction factor, effectiveness-NTU method, heat transfer correlations, flat tube heat exchanger
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
