Cited by 17Spacecraft Design and TechnologySpace Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Dynamics and Control

A comprehensive attitude formulation with spin for numerical model of irradiance for CubeSats and Picosats

Morsch Filho, Edemar, Nicolau, Vicente de Paulo, Paiva, Kleber Vieira de, Possamai, Talita Sauter·2020·Applied Thermal Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114859

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morsch Filho, E., Nicolau, V. D. P., Paiva, K. V. D., & Possamai, T. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Venue
Applied Thermal Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
168
Pages
114859
ISSN
1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997791925
Cited by
17
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CNPq
  • National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
CubeSat, spin motion, thermal irradiation, infrared radiation, eclipses, detumbling, orbital altitude

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review