Cited by 88SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchComputational Drug Discovery MethodsSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Validation and invalidation of SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors using the Flip-GFP and Protease-Glo luciferase assays

Open access
Ma, Chunlong, Tan, Haozhou, Choza, Juliana, Wang, Yuyin, Wang, Jun·2022·Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M pro ) is one of the most extensive exploited drug targets for COVID-19. Structurally disparate compounds have been reported as M pro inhibitors, raising the question of their target specificity. To elucidate the target specificity and the cellular target engagement of the claimed M pro inhibitors, we systematically characterize their mechanism of action using the cell-free FRET assay, the thermal shift-binding assay, the cell lysate Protease-Glo luciferase assay, and the cell-based Flip-GFP assay. Collectively, our results have shown that majority of the M pro inhibitors identified from drug repurposing including ebselen, carmofur, disulfiram, and shikonin are promiscuous cysteine inhibitors that are not specific to M pro , while chloroquine, oxytetracycline, montelukast, candesartan, and dipyridamole do not inhibit M pro in any of the assays tested. Overall, our study highlights the need of stringent hit validation at the early stage of drug discovery. Graphical abstract Flip-GFP and Protease-Glo luciferase assays, coupled with the FRET and thermal shift binding assays, were applied to validate the reported SARS-CoV-2 M pro inhibitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.10.026

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inhibitory potential of DIS on Mpro and PLpro was contradictory.

    “Ultimately, the inhibitory potential of DIS on Mpro and PLpro was contradictory.98,99”

    From Off-label and repurposed use of disulfiram beyond alcohol dependence: A systematic review of clinical and preclinical evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [98]

    In Results and discussion, under “Bioactive compounds from drug repurposing” (page unavailable), the paper contrasts an earlier report that disulfiram inhibits Mpro with follow-up findings, including its own, that it did not inhibit Mpro under the tested conditions. It also reports proposed PLpro inhibition, but does not describe contradictory findings for PLpro. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, C., Tan, H., Choza, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jun
Venue
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1636-1651
ISSN
2211-3835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208802464
Cited by
86
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI147325, AI157046, AI158775)
  • University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
main protease, Mpro inhibitors, COVID-19 drug repurposing, target specificity, hit validation, FRET assay, cysteine protease inhibitors, ebselen, carmofur, disulfiram, shikonin, chloroquine, oxytetracycline, montelukast, candesartan, dipyridamole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review