Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 700

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders: Mechanisms and implications

Open access
Dash, Umesh Chandra, Bhol, Nitish Kumar, Swain, Sandeep Kumar, Samal, Rashmi Rekha, Nayak, Prabhat Kumar, Raina, Vishakha, Panda, Sandeep Kumar, Kerry, Rout George, Duttaroy, Asim K., Jena, Atala Bihari·2025·Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B

Abstract

Neuroprotection is a proactive approach to safeguarding the nervous system, including the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves, by preventing or limiting damage to nerve cells and other components. It primarily defends the central nervous system against injury from acute and progressive neurodegenerative disorders. Oxidative stress, an imbalance between the body's natural defense mechanisms and the generation of reactive oxygen species, is crucial in developing neurological disorders. Due to its high metabolic rate and oxygen consumption, the brain is particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress. Excessive ROS damages the essential biomolecules, leading to cellular malfunction and neurodegeneration. Several neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and ischemic stroke, are associated with oxidative stress. Understanding the impact of oxidative stress in these conditions is crucial for developing new treatment methods. Researchers are exploring using antioxidants and other molecules to mitigate oxidative stress, aiming to prevent or slow down the progression of brain diseases. By understanding the intricate interplay between oxidative stress and neurological disorders, scientists hope to pave the way for innovative therapeutic and preventive approaches, ultimately improving individuals' living standards.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.10.004

Cites

185 of 185 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 185 references

Cited by

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Dash, U. C., Bhol, N. K., Swain, S. K., Samal, R. R., Nayak, P. K., Raina, V., Panda, S. K., Kerry, R. G., Duttaroy, A. K., & Jena, A. B.
Venue
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
15-34
ISSN
2211-3835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403464922
Cited by
700
References
185
FWCI
119.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders: Mechanisms and implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apsb.2024.10.004
The paper
Dash, U. C., Bhol, N. K., Swain, S. K., Samal, R. R., Nayak, P. K., Raina, V., Panda, S. K., Kerry, R. G., Duttaroy, A. K., & Jena, A. B. (2025). Oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders: Mechanisms and implications. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2024.10.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.