Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physico-chemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil

Open access
Abujabhah, Ibrahim S., Bound, Sally A., Doyle, Richard, Bowman, John P.·2016·Applied Soil Ecology

Abstract

The use of biochar and compost as soil amendments and their comparative effects on microbial activities and related processes were investigated in an apple orchard site at Mountain River in Tasmania, Australia. Biochar derived from Acacia green waste was applied at a rate of 47 ton ha−1 just before planting and has been in situ for 3.5 years. Compost produced by the Luebke system was also applied separately at 10 ton ha−1 as a top dressing one week after planting. Chemical analysis indicated that there was no significant impact on total ions by either biochar or compost additions. However, organic carbon was significantly increased (p = 0.009) by 23% for biochar and 55% for compost treatments. Soil pH decreased in both biochar and compost treatments. Microbial abundance was improved after the addition of biochar, but the effect of compost addition was greater. There were no significant differences across a panel of enzyme activities among treatments. There were slight increases in alkaline phosphatase while fluorescein diacetate activity and hydrolysis activity slightly decreased. The entire community of the soil was assessed using 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA genes amplicon pyrosequencing. Significant differences in bacterial and fungal but not archaeal or other eukaryota community components were observed. These results indicated that biochar and compost carbon amendments can subtly affect the community structure of the orchard soils despite active application of inorganic and organic fertilizers. The overall effects on fundamental activity is largely neutral, however, likely due to the enormous structural resilience and functional redundancy present.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.021

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Abujabhah, I. S., Bound, S. A., Doyle, R., & Bowman, J. P.
Venue
Applied Soil Ecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
98
Pages
243-253
ISSN
0929-1393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2184412344
Cited by
288
References
66
FWCI
25.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physico-chemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.021
The paper
Abujabhah, I. S., Bound, S. A., Doyle, R., & Bowman, J. P. (2016). Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physico-chemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.