CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 75High-Temperature Coating BehaviorsErosion and Abrasive MachiningSurface Treatment and Coatings

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A hybrid approach to determine critical and erosion velocities in the cold spray process

Moridi, A., Hassani-Gangaraj, S.M., Guagliano, M.·2013·Applied Surface Science
DOI 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.089
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Steenkiste, 1999, Kinetic spray coatings, Surface and Coatings Technology, 111, 62, 10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00709-9 · DOI
  2. Ji, 2011, Influence of the interface temperature and strain gradients on the impact energy model of a soft particle on a hard substrate during kinetic spraying, Metals and Materials International, 17, 335, 10.1007/s12540-011-0423-6 · DOI
  3. Kumar, 2009, Deposition characteristics of copper particles on roughened substrates through kinetic spraying, Applied Surface Science, 255, 3472, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.060 · DOI
  4. King, 2010, An experimental and finite element study of cold spray copper impact onto two aluminum substrates, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 19, 620, 10.1007/s11666-009-9454-7 · DOI
  5. Zhang, 2005, Cold gas dynamic spraying of aluminum: the role of substrate characteristics in deposit formation, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 14, 109, 10.1361/10599630522666 · DOI
  6. Assadi, 2003, Bonding mechanism in cold gas spraying, Acta Materialia, 51, 4379, 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00274-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schmidt, 2006, Development of a generalized parameter window for cold spray deposition, Acta Materialia, 54, 729, 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Schmidt, 2009, From particle acceleration to impact and bonding in cold spraying, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 18, 794, 10.1007/s11666-009-9357-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Alkhimov, 2000, Experimental study of deformation and attachment of microparticles to an obstacle upon high-rate impact, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 41, 245, 10.1007/BF02465264 · DOI
  10. Alkhimov, 2000, Specific features of microparticle deformation upon impact on a rigid barrier, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 41, 188, 10.1007/BF02465255 · DOI
  11. Grujicic, 2004, Adiabatic shear instability based mechanism for particles/substrate bonding in the cold-gas dynamic-spray process, Materials and Design, 25, 681, 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.03.008 · DOI
  12. Bae, 2008, General aspects of interface bonding in kinetic sprayed coatings, Acta Materialia, 56, 4858, 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.003 · DOI
  13. Ghelichi, 2011, Numerical simulation of cold spray coating, Surface and Coatings Technology, 205, 5294, 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.05.038 · DOI
  14. Li, 2006, Examination of the critical velocity for deposition of particles in cold spraying, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 15, 212, 10.1361/105996306X108093 · DOI
  15. Li, 2010, Significant influence of particle surface oxidation on deposition efficiency, interface microstructure and adhesive strength of cold-sprayed copper coatings, Applied Surface Science, 256, 4953, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.008 · DOI
  16. Li, 2010, Influence of spray materials and their surface oxidation on the critical velocity in cold spraying, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 19, 95, 10.1007/s11666-009-9427-x · DOI
  17. Kang, 2008, Oxidation dependency of critical velocity for aluminum feedstock deposition in kinetic spraying process, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 486, 300, 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.010 · DOI
  18. Ning, 2007, The effects of powder properties on in-flight particle velocity and deposition process during low pressure cold spray process, Applied Surface Science, 253, 7449, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.03.031 · DOI
  19. Assadi, 2011, On parameter selection in cold spraying, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 20, 1161, 10.1007/s11666-011-9662-9 · DOI
  20. Wu, 2006, Critical velocity for high speed particle deposition in kinetic spraying, Materials Transactions, 47, 1721, 10.2320/matertrans.47.1723 · DOI
  21. Wu, 2006, The rebound phenomenon in kinetic spraying deposition, Scripta Materialia, 54, 665, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.028 · DOI
  22. Zhou, 2011, Numerical investigation of the rebounding and the deposition behavior of particles during cold spraying, Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 24, 43
  23. A. Singh, V. Magnanimo, S. Luding, Sticking of adhesive particles in elasto plastic collisions, Granular matter, under review.
  24. Persson, 2010, An experimental evaluation of the accuracy to simulate granule bed compression using the discrete element method, Powder Technology, 219, 249, 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.12.054 · DOI
  25. S.M.H. Gangaraj, M. Guagliano, G.H. Farrahi, An approach to relate shot peening finite element simulation to the actual coverage, Surface and Coatings Technology, article in Press. · DOI
  26. Johnson, 1993, Material characterization for warhead computations, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 155, 165
  27. Kappor, 1998, Determination of temperature rise during high strain rate deformation, Mechanics of Materials, 27, 1, 10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00036-7 · DOI
  28. Meguid, 2002, 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 27, 119, 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00043-4 · DOI
  29. Gärtner, 2006, The cold spray process and its potential for industrial applications, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 15, 223, 10.1361/105996306X108110 · DOI
  30. Stoltenhoff, 2002, An analysis of the cold spray process and its coatings, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 11, 542, 10.1361/105996302770348682 · DOI
  31. Gilmore, 1999, Particle velocity and deposition efficiency in the cold spray process, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 8, 576, 10.1361/105996399770350278 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moridi, A., Hassani-Gangaraj, S. M., & Guagliano, M.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Guagliano, M.
ORCID
Venue
Applied Surface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
273
Pages
617-624
ISSN
0169-4332 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.089
OpenAlex
W2071506350
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Applied Surface Science (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Erosion and Abrasive Machining
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
Keywords
cold spray, critical speed, erosion rate, particle porosity, coating adhesion, particle impact velocity, copper particles, temperature dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review