Cited by 476Hip disorders and treatmentsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesShoulder Injury and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of radiographic findings suggestive of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in asymptomatic individuals. Methods: A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting radiographic, computed tomographic, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that were suggestive of FAI in asymptomatic volunteers were included. Cam, pincer, and combined pathologic conditions were investigated. Results: We identified 26 studies for inclusion, comprising 2,114 asymptomatic hips (57.2% men; 42.8% women). The mean participant age was 25.3 ± 1.5 years. The mean alpha angle in asymptomatic hips was 54.1° ± 5.1°. The prevalence of an asymptomatic cam deformity was 37% (range, 7% to 100% between studies)—54.8% in athletes versus 23.1% in the general population. Of the 17 studies that measured alpha angles, 9 used MRI and 9 used radiography (1 study used both). The mean lateral and anterior center edge angles (CEAs) were 31.2° and 30°, respectively. The prevalence of asymptomatic hips with pincer deformity was 67% (range 61% to 76% between studies). Pincer deformity was poorly defined (4 studies [15%]; focal anterior overcoverage, acetabular retroversion, abnormal CEA or acetabular index, coxa profunda, acetabular protrusio, ischial spine sign, crossover sign, and posterior wall sign). Only 7 studies reported on labral injury, which was found on MRI without intra‐articular contrast in 68.1% of hips. Conclusions: FAI morphologic features and labral injuries are common in asymptomatic patients. Clinical decision making should carefully analyze the association of patient history and physical examination with radiographic imaging. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review if Level II‐IV studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.042

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.5435/00124635-201300001-00004 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/01.blo.0000246536.90371.12 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/01.blo.0000181147.86058.74 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s11999-010-1539-6 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/01.blo.0000136903.01368.20 · DOI
  7. 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0363546513499227 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00256-012-1544-9 · DOI
  10. 10.2106/JBJS.K.01664 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.024 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0363546513483448 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182518d57 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.008 · DOI
  15. 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)10 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0363546512439991 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0363546512462124 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0363546512441328 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jor.21371 · DOI
  20. 10.2106/JBJS.K.00544 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/jmri.22528 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11420-010-9192-x · DOI
  23. 10.1002/art.30589 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0363546510388931 · DOI
  25. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01280 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/acr.20198 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.016 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/mrm.22166 · DOI
  29. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.22028 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/mrm.21190 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180f60b53 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.017 · DOI
  33. 10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819406 · DOI
  34. 10.5435/00124635-201300001-00005 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s11999-011-1945-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/0363546514524364 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.011.1100230608 · DOI
  38. 10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.0840556 · DOI
  39. 10.2106/JBJS.I.00326 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00167-013-2678-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jor.22086 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s11999-012-2689-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s00330-010-1956-7 · DOI
  44. 10.2214/AJR.07.3669 · DOI
  45. Reurink G., 2012, Reliability and validity of diagnosing acetabular labral lesions with magnetic resonance arthrography, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 94

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–422 of 422

Metadata

Authors
Frank, J. M., Harris, J. D., Erickson, B. J., Slikker, W., Bush‐Joseph, C. A., Salata, M. J., & Nho, S. J.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Frank, Jonathan M.
Venue
Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-28
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1199-1204
ISSN
  • 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-3231
OpenAlex
W2027317771
Cited by
476
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 24
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Keywords
femoroacetabular impingement, prevalence, cam deformity, alpha angle, center-edge angle, acetabular index, labral lesions, hip morphology, athletes
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Imaging, Hip Joint, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Global Health, Prevalence, Femoracetabular Impingement, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review