Cited by 311Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Non-invasive estimate of blood glucose and blood pressure from a photoplethysmograph by means of machine learning techniques

Open access
Monte-Moreno, Enric·2011·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Objective This work presents a system for a simultaneous non-invasive estimate of the blood glucose level (BGL) and the systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, using a photoplethysmograph (PPG) and machine learning techniques. The method is independent of the person whose values are being measured and does not need calibration over time or subjects.Methodology The architecture of the system consists of a photoplethysmograph sensor, an activity detection module, a signal processing module that extracts features from the PPG waveform, and a machine learning algorithm that estimates the SBP, DBP and BGL values. The idea that underlies the system is that there is functional relationship between the shape of the PPG waveform and the blood pressure and glucose levels.Results As described in this paper we tested this method on 410 individuals without performing any personalized calibration. The results were computed after cross validation. The machine learning techniques tested were: ridge linear regression, a multilayer perceptron neural network, support vector machines and random forests. The best results were obtained with the random forest technique. In the case of blood pressure, the resulting coefficients of determination for reference vs. prediction were R(SBP)(2)=0.91, R(DBP)(2)=0.89, and R(BGL)(2)=0.90. For the glucose estimation, distribution of the points on a Clarke error grid placed 87.7% of points in zone A, 10.3% in zone B, and 1.9% in zone D. Blood pressure values complied with the grade B protocol of the British Hypertension society.Conclusion An effective system for estimate of blood glucose and blood pressure from a photoplethysmograph is presented. The main advantage of the system is that for clinical use it complies with the grade B protocol of the British Hypertension society for the blood pressure and only in 1.9% of the cases did not detect hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.05.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 311

Authors
Monte-Moreno, E.
Affiliations
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Corresponding author
Monte-Moreno, Enric
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
127-138
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985034572
Cited by
311
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
blood pressure estimation, photoplethysmography, random forest, activity detection, Clarke error grid
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Linear Models, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review