Cited by 126Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesMulti-Criteria Decision MakingAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development

Khan, Arif Ali, Shameem, Mohammad, Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, Hussain, Shahid, Yan, Xuefeng·2019·Applied Soft Computing

DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L., & Kearns, K. P. (1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,407
Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP
Chang, D.-Y. (1996) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 · Cited by 4,874
The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0062 · Cited by 1,340
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Wang, J., Chakraborty, C., & Ouyang, H. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/9781599048437.ch003 · Cited by 1,334
Global software development
Herbsleb, J. D., & Moitra, D. (2001) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.914732 · Cited by 1,059
A discipline for software engineering
(1995) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)90062-4 · Cited by 1,018
IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology
(1990) · doi:10.1109/ieeestd.1990.101064 · Cited by 995
The Capability Maturity Model for Software
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (2011) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1109/9781118156667.ch2 · Cited by 801
Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment
Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., & Yazdankhah, A. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063 · Cited by 604
Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A Zadeh
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1996) · Cited by 559

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

M. Kuhrmann, C. Konopka, P. Nellemann, P. Diebold, J. Münch, Software process improvement: where is the evidence?: initial findings from a systematic mapping study, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process.
P. Abrahamsson, Measuring the success of software process improvement: the dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.4645, 2013. · arXiv
M. Bano, N. Ikram, Software process improvement: A systematic literature review, in: 15th International Multitopic Conference, INMIC, 2012, pp. 459–464. · DOI
Ayhan, 2013, Fuzzy topsis application for supplier selection problem, Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manag., 5, 159
IEEE, 1991, Standards coordinating committee of the IEEE Computer Society
N. Baddoo, T. Hall, D. Wilson, Implementing a people focused SPI programme, in: 11th European Software Control and Metrics Conference, 2000, pp. 373–382.
N. Bunditwongrat, T. Mathupayas, N. Atcharawan, An empirical framework of key success factors for software process improvement, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management & Evaluation, 2011, pp. 82–90.
Kabir, 2011, Comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for multicriteria inventory classification, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Syst., 1, 1

Sorted by citations

A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements
Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738 · Cited by 1,088
Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution
Madjid Tavana, D., Soltanifar, M., & Santos‐Arteaga, F. J. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04432-2 · Cited by 327
Quantum computing challenges in the software industry. A fuzzy AHP-based approach
Awan, U., Hannola, L., Tandon, A., Goyal, R. K., & Dhir, A. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106896 · Cited by 163
Evaluate sustainable human resource management in the manufacturing companies using an extended Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-TOPSIS method
Saeidi, P., Mardani, A., Mishra, A. R., Cajas, V., & Galarraga-Carvajal, M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133380 · Cited by 121
Gresilient supplier selection through Fuzzy Ordinal Priority Approach: decision-making in post-COVID era
Mahmoudi, A., Javed, S. A., & Mardani, A. (2021) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-021-00178-z · Cited by 125
Establishing a Sustainable Sports Tourism Evaluation Framework with a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Explore Potential Sports Tourism Attractions in Taiwan
Yang, J.-J., Lo, H.-W., Chao, C.-S., Shen, C., & Yang, C.-C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12041673 · Cited by 95
A novel two stage approach for electric taxis charging station site selection
Kaya, Ö., Alemdar, K. D., & Çodur, M. Y. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102396 · Cited by 94
Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study
Kizielewicz, B., Wątróbski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13246548 · Cited by 84
Electric car sharing stations site selection from the perspective of sustainability: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach
Kaya, Ö., Alemdar, K. D., Atalay, A., Çodur, M. Y., & Tortum, A. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102026 · Cited by 84
Taxonomical classification of barriers for scaling agile methods in global software development environment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Nadeem, M., & Khan, A. A. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106122 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
A Fuzzy-AHP based prioritization of trust criteria in fog computing services
Ogundoyin, S. O., & Kamil, I. A. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106789 · Cited by 73
A novel fuzzy integrated MCDM model for optimal selection of waste-to-energy-based-distributed generation under uncertainty: A case of the City of Cape Town, South Africa
Alao, M. A., Popoola, O., & Ayodele, T. R. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130824 · Cited by 64
CCS-OSSR: A framework based on Hybrid MCDM for Optimal Service Selection and Ranking of Cloud Computing Services
Kumar, R. R., Kumari, B., & Kumar, C. (2020) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-020-03166-3 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises
Mahmud, P., Paul, S. K., Azeem, A., & Chowdhury, P. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137449 · Cited by 60
Route selection in multimodal transportation networks: a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach
Koohathongsumrit, N., & Meethom, W. (2021) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2020.1871084 · Cited by 56
Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE
Rafi, S., Yu, W., Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998819 · Cited by 50
An integrated methodology for the selection of sustainable suppliers and order allocation problem with quantity discounts, lost sales and varying supplier availabilities
Bektur, G. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.05.006 · Cited by 49
Identification and Prioritization of Cloud Based Global Software Development Best Practices
Akbar, M. A., Mahmood, S., AlSalman, H., Razzaq, A., Gumaei, A., & Riaz, M. T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3031365 · Cited by 49
Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Prioritisation and Taxonomy of Success Factors for Scaling Agile Methods in Global Software Development
Shameem, M., Khan, A. A., Hasan, M. G., & Akbar, M. A. (2020) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2019.0196 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Identification and prioritization of DevOps success factors using fuzzy-AHP approach
Akbar, M. A., Mahmood, S., Shafiq, M., Alsanad, A., Alsanad, A. A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05150-w · Cited by 46
Retracted
Barriers to information and digital technology adoption in humanitarian supply chain management: a fuzzy AHP approach
Kabra, G., Anbanandam, R., Jain, V., & Akhtar, P. (2023) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-10-2021-0456 · Cited by 45
On solving large data matrix problems in Fuzzy AHP
Sakhardande, M. J., & Gaonkar, R. S. P. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116488 · Cited by 44
A Fuzzy AHP-based approach for prioritization of cost overhead factors in agile software development
Saeed, S. A., Khan, S. U. R., & Mashkoor, A. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109977 · Cited by 42
Evaluation of Ergonomics‐Related Disorders in Online Education Using Fuzzy AHP
Upadhyay, H. K., Juneja, S., Juneja, A., Dhiman, G., & Kautish, S. (2021) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2021/2214971 · Cited by 42
A Risk Analysis Based on a Two-Stage Model of Fuzzy AHP-DEA for Multimodal Freight Transportation Systems
Kaewfak, K., Huynh, V., Ammarapala, V., & Ratisoontorn, N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3018669 · Cited by 38
Multicriteria Based Decision Making of DevOps Data Quality Assessment Challenges Using Fuzzy TOPSIS
Rafi, S., Yu, W., Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2976803 · Cited by 37
A computational framework for ranking prediction of cloud services under fuzzy environment
Kumar, R. R., Shameem, M., & Kumar, C. (2021) · Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.1080/17517575.2021.1889037 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Selection of an industrial boiler for a soda-ash production plant using analytical hierarchy process and TOPSIS approaches
Hasnain, S., Ali, M. K., Akhter, J. I., AHMED, B., & Abbas, N. (2020) · Case Studies in Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100636 · Cited by 35
Towards Process Improvement in DevOps
Badshah, S., Khan, A. A., & Khan, B. (2020) · International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) · doi:10.1145/3383219.3383280 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Surveying the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the poultry supply chain: A mixed methods study
Palouj, M., Adaryani, R. L., Alambeigi, A., Movarej, M., & سیس, ی. ص. (2021) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108084 · Cited by 33
Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
Balogun, A., Sheng, T. Y., Sallehuddin, M. H., Aina, Y. A., Dano, U. L., Pradhan, B., Yekeen, S. T., & Tella, A. (2022) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049.2022.2076910 · Cited by 33
Systematic review of software engineering uses of multi-criteria decision-making methods: Trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, recommendations, and future directions
Magabaleh, A. A., Ghraibeh, L. L., Audeh, A. Y., Albahri, A. S., Deveci, M., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2024) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111859 · Cited by 31
Analyzing Factors That Influence Offshore Outsourcing Decision of Application Maintenance
Rahman, H. U., Raza, M., Afsar, P., Khan, H. U., & Nazir, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3029501 · Cited by 33
Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for smart city transformation: Case study Belgrade
Ilić, D., Milošević, I. M., & Ilić-Kosanović, T. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121487 · Cited by 32
A Case Study on Implementing Agile Techniques and Practices: Rationale, Benefits, Barriers and Business Implications for Hardware Development
Weichbroth, P. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12178457 · Cited by 30
A calibrated piecewise-linear FGM approach for travel destination recommendation during the COVID-19 pandemic
Chen, T., & Wang, Y.-C. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107535 · Cited by 27
Taxonomy of Quality Assessment for Intelligent Software Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Jabborov, A., Kharlamova, A., Kholmatova, Z., Kruglov, A. V., Kruglov, V., & Succi, G. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3333920 · Cited by 31
A systematic decision-making framework for tackling quantum software engineering challenges
Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., & Rafi, S. (2023) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-023-00389-7 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
RMDevOps
Rafi, S., Wu, Y. C., & Akbar, M. A. (2020) · International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) · doi:10.1145/3383219.3383278 · Cited by 23
A hybrid approach of fuzzy risk assessment-based incenter of centroid and MCDM methods for multimodal transportation route selection
Koohathongsumrit, N., & Chankham, W. (2022) · Cogent Engineering · doi:10.1080/23311916.2022.2091672 · Cited by 22
Analyzing barriers for implementing new vehicle scrap policy in India
James, A. T., Asjad, M., Kumar, G., Shukla, V. C., & Arya, V. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103568 · Cited by 22
Fuzzy Multicriteria Modelling of Decision Making in the Renewal of Healthcare Technologies
Domínguez, S., & Carnero, M. C. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8060944 · Cited by 21
Prioritization Based Taxonomy of DevOps Challenges Using Fuzzy AHP Analysis
Akbar, M. A., Naveed, W., Mahmood, S., Alsanad, A. A., Alsanad, A., Gumaei, A., & Mateen, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3035880 · Cited by 21
Prioritization and Ranking of indicators of sustainable manufacturing in Indian MSMEs using fuzzy AHP approach
Gani, A., Asjad, M., & Talib, F. (2021) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.101 · Cited by 21
Evaluation Model of Adaptive Teaching Ability of College Art Teachers
Kong, F. (2020) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i09.14031 · Cited by 20
A Hybrid Neutrosophic-Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process Method: Decision-Making Modelling in Uncertain Environments
Vafadarnikjoo, A., & Scherz, M. (2021) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/1239505 · Cited by 23
Challenges of Working from Home in Software Development During Covid-19 Lockdowns
Müller, K., Koch, C., Riehle, D., Stops, M., & Harutyunyan, N. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3579636 · Cited by 20
A novel fuzzy group decision-making approach based on CCSD method for thermal insulation board selection problem: A case study
Deli̇ktaş, D., & Şahinöz, Ö. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105986 · Cited by 19
Selection of software agile practices using Analytic hierarchy process
Esponda, R. D. E., López-Benítez, M., Matturro, G., & Gómez, J. C. O. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22948 · Cited by 19
PMBOK, IPMA and fuzzy-AHP based novel framework for leadership competencies development in megaprojects
Faisal, M. N., Subaie, A. A. A., Sabir, L. B., & Sharif, K. J. (2022) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-10-2021-0583 · Cited by 18
Analytic hierarchy process‐based prioritization framework for vendor's reliability challenges in global software development
Khan, A. W., Hussain, I., & Zamir, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2310 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Development of a Model for Trust Management in the Social Internet of Things
Rizwanullah, M., Singh, S., Kumar, R., Alrayes, F. S., Alharbi, A., Alnfiai, M. M., Chaurasia, P. K., & Agrawal, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12010041 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Software process selection system based on multicriteria decision making
Pandey, P., & Litoriya, R. (2020) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2305 · Cited by 17
A multi-criteria cloud selection model based on fuzzy logic technique for QoS
Faiz, M., & Daniel, A. K. (2022) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-022-01723-0 · Cited by 16
Assessing the Role of Financial Literacy in FinTech Adoption by MSEs: Ensuring Sustainability Through a Fuzzy AHP Approach
Mohapatra, N., Das, M., Shekhar, S., Singh, R., Khan, S., Tewari, L., Félix, M., & Santos, G. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17104340 · Cited by 21
An Evaluation Framework for the Planning of Electric Car-Sharing Systems: A Combination Model of AHP-CBA-VD
Xue, Y., Zhang, Y. S., & Yi, C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205627 · Cited by 14
ACCELERATING SMALL FIRMS’ PRODUCTION PROCESS IMPROVEMENT THROUGH INTERNATIONAL MARKET KNOWLEDGE AND VALUABLE, RARE, INIMITABLE, AND ORGANIZED RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES
Kaukab, ‪. E., Adawiyah, W. R., Setyanto, R. P., & Suroso, A. (2020) · Verslas teorija ir praktika · doi:10.3846/btp.2020.11652 · Cited by 14
Genetic model-based success probability prediction of quantum software development projects
Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., & Nadeem, M. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107352 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Business process management approach for improving agile software process and agile maturity
Kose, B. O. (2020) · J. Softw. Evol. Process. · doi:10.1002/smr.2331 · Cited by 15
Purchase decision making of garage equipment using an integrated fuzzy AHP and grey relation analysis method
James, A. T., Asjad, M., & Panchal, R. (2022) · Grey Systems Theory and Application · doi:10.1108/gs-05-2022-0047 · Cited by 12
A Conceptual Framework Based on PLS-SEM Approach for Sustainable Customer Relationship Management in Enterprise Software Development: Insights from Developers
Khattak, K.-N., Hassan, Z., Naqvi, S. S. A., Khan, M. A., Qayyum, F., & Ullah, I. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16062507 · Cited by 16
Optimization of frying process for maintaining nutritional quality to satisfy consumers' sensory attributes: A novel application of multi‐criteria decision‐making approach
Sadhu, T., Lahiri, S. K., Roy, J., Bhattacharjee, A., & Chakrabarty, J. (2022) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/mcda.1799 · Cited by 11
Critical Success Factors of IT Outsourcing in Indonesian Public Sectors: A Case Study at Employment Social Security Agency
Pakpahan, J., Eryadi, R. A., Budiman, A. T., Sunandar, N., Syahid, L. M., & Shihab, M. R. (2021) · International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) · doi:10.1109/icoiact53268.2021.9563920 · Cited by 11
What Matters in Hiring Professionals for Global Software Development? A SLR and NLP Criteria Clustering
SANTOS, E. A. D., de Souza, D. G. B., & da Silva, C. E. S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3279769 · Cited by 10
Taxonomy of metrics for effectively estimating quantum software projects: A fuzzy-AHP based analysis
Shameem, M., Nadeem, M., Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., & Kumar, A. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112816 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Ranking of cloud services by applying BWM-TOPSIS, BWM-ARAS, and BWM-COPRAS hybrid MCDM methods
Mishra, A., & Kumar, R. R. (2025) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-025-00775-2 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
An Evaluation Model of the Learning Effect of Physical Education Major Courses in Colleges
Tong, S. (2020) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i07.13691 · Cited by 9
Identification and prioritization of security challenges of big data on cloud computing based on SLR: A fuzzy‐TOPSIS analysis approach
Khan, A. W., Khan, M. U., Khan, J. A., Khan, J. A., & Gul, W. (2021) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2387 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Comparative effects of knowledge-based antecedents in different realms of CMMI-based software process improvement success
Chen, C., & Lee, J.-C. (2021) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2021.103599 · Cited by 11
Different variants of pandemic and prevention strategies: A prioritizing framework in fuzzy environment
Razzaq, O. A., Fahad, M., & Khan, N. A. (2021) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104564 · Cited by 9
Optimal Core Operation in Supply Chain Finance Ecosystem by Integrating the Fuzzy Algorithm and Hierarchical Framework
Lin, C.-Y. (2020) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.2991/ijcis.d.200226.001 · Cited by 8
Exploration and prioritization of crucial factors of artificial intelligence adoption in credit risk scoring: using the fuzzy analytical hierarchical process
Malik, S., Garg, M., Thomas, A., Cillo, V., & Giudice, M. D. (2025) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-09-2024-0886 · Cited by 11
Integrated fuzzy linguistic preference relations approach and fuzzy Quality Function Deployment to the sustainable design of hybrid electric vehicles
Kang, X., & Zhu, Q. H. (2022) · Concurrent Engineering · doi:10.1177/1063293x221117291 · Cited by 7
A Conceptual Model of Factors Influencing Customer Relationship Management in Global Software Development: A Client Perspective
Khattak, K.-N., Ahmed, M., Iqbal, N., Khan, M.-A., Imran, I., & Kim, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12157851 · Cited by 8
Applying the Fuzzy BWM to Determine the Cryptocurrency Trading System under Uncertain Decision Process
Yang, Y.-C., Shieh, W.-S., & Lin, C.-Y. (2023) · Axioms · doi:10.3390/axioms12020209 · Cited by 7
Model and Algorithms of Enterprise Informatization Software Selection Based on Grey Relational Analysis
Shang, H. (2020) · Ingénierie des systèmes d information · doi:10.18280/isi.250114 · Cited by 7
Optimal SVC allocation for enhancing modern power network stability using a max–min aggregation based multi-criteria hybrid CF-PSO FAHP algorithm considering N-1 contingencies
Moulum, P. A., Mandeng, J. J., & Kom, C. H. (2025) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111192 · Cited by 6
A total distance ranking approach to fuzzy AHP-based MCDM method for selecting sustainable manufacturing facility location
Nghiem, T. B. H., & Chu, T. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-223962 · Cited by 6
Prioritization of DevOps Maturity models using Fuzzy TOPSIS
Kumar, A., Nadeem, M., & Shameem, M. (2023) · International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) · doi:10.1145/3593434.3594241 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Selection of Semiconductor Packaging Materials by Combined Fuzzy AHP-Entropy and Proximity Index Value Method
Bingöl, S. (2022) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/7901861 · Cited by 6
Comparative study of SPI success factors in global and in-house environment for large-scale software companies
Iqbal, J., Jibran, H., Al‐Shamayleh, A. S., Abbas, F., Akhunzada, A., Alharthi, S. Z., & Gani, A. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1656 · Cited by 5
The impact of personality traits and cultural values on coordination effectiveness: A study of software development teams effectiveness
Shameem, M., Kumar, C., Chandra, B., Khan, A. A., Ahmed, M. N., Verner, J. M., Nadeem, M., & Akbar, M. A. (2024) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2652 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Prioritizing Critical Success Factors for Smallholder Maize Farmers in Zambia: A Pathway to Sustainable Food Security and Rural Development
Malesu, M. L., Syrovátka, P., & Chisale, S. W. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.70038 · Cited by 9
AHP ve TOPSIS Yöntemleri ile Bilgi Teknolojileri Projelerinde Scrum-Kanban-Şelale Uygulamaları Karşılaştırması
Ceylan, Z., & GÜRSEV, S. (2020) · Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi · doi:10.17671/gazibtd.672234 · Cited by 5
Challenges to Project Management in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Badshah, S. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119821779.ch12 · Cited by 5
AHP‐Based Prioritization Framework for Software Outsourcing Human Resource Success Factors in Global Software Development
Khan, A. W., Yaseen, G., Khan, M. I., & Khan, F. N. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119821779.ch7 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
PUGH Decision Trapezoidal Fuzzy and Gradient Reinforce Deep Learning for Large Scale Requirement Prioritization
Devadas, R. M., & Cholli, N. G. (2022) · Indian Journal of Science and Technology · doi:10.17485/ijst/v15i12.1757 · Cited by 4
Modeling of water scarcity for spatial analysis using Water Poverty Index and fuzzy-MCDM technique
Pham, T. M., Dinh, H. T., Pham, T. A., Nguyen, T. S., & Duong, N. T. (2023) · Modeling Earth Systems and Environment · doi:10.1007/s40808-023-01884-2 · Cited by 6
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Barriers of adopting quantum technology in blockchain: a prioritization-based framework
Alahmari, M. (2023) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-023-09433-w · Cited by 4
Retracted
Multicriteria Decision Making to Continuous Software Improvement Based on Quality Management, Assurance, and Metrics
Sun, L., Nazir, S., & Hussain, A. (2021) · Scientific Programming · doi:10.1155/2021/9953618 · Cited by 4
Influência de Práticas de Gestão do Conhecimento Aplicadas ao Desenvolvimento Ágil de Software
Candal, D. M., Gaspar, M. A., Costa, I., de Magalhães, F. L. F., & Ferreira, R. (2023) · RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação · doi:10.17013/risti.48.74-88 · Cited by 4
A Novel Decision Making Approach for Benchmarking the Service Quality of Smart Community Health Centers
Li, H., Li, J., & Dietl, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037769 · Cited by 3
Numerical fact-finding of different functions impact on the fuzzy preference programming optimality
Pandiya, R., Fitriana, G. F., Adhinata, F. D., & Wahyuningrum, T. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121291 · Cited by 3
Inverse Trigonometric Fuzzy Preference Programming to Generate Weights with Optimal Solutions Implemented on Evaluation Criteria in E-Learning
Iryanti, E., Santosa, P. I., Kusumawardani, S. S., & Hidayah, I. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13030068 · Cited by 3
A Fuzzy AHP-based Quantitative Framework to Prioritize the Crowd-Based Requirements
Khan, S. U. R., Younus, M., Iqbal, J., & Rahim, M. A. B. U. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C) · doi:10.1109/qrs-c63300.2024.00090 · Cited by 3
Application of Fuzzy Logic to Evaluate the Economic Impact of COVID-19: Case Study of a Project-Oriented Travel Agency
Thalmeiner, G., Gáspár, S., Barta, Á., & Zéman, Z. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179602 · Cited by 3
Challenges in Creating Business Value from Health Information Systems (HIS): A Hybrid Fuzzy Approach
Zareravasan, A., & Alizadeh‐Navaei, R. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22059/jitm.2021.312543.2644 · Cited by 3
Critical Challenges of Designing Software Architecture for Internet of Things (IoT) Software System
Rehman, N., & Khan, A. W. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119821779.ch11 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Identifying and prioritizing technologies contributing toward the triple bottom line sustainability in the banking sector through fuzzy AHP methodology
Kumar, P. K., & Garg, M. (2026) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-026-00894-7 · Cited by 2
Taxonomy of challenges influencing secure code generation using LLMs: An integrated approach of systematic literature review and F-AHP
Shameem, M., Anwer, S., Mahmood, S., Algamdi, S. A., Niazi, M., & Mohammed, M. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.116127 · Cited by 2
Self-citation

Authors: Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Hussain, S., & Yan, X.
Affiliations: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author: Khan, Arif Ali
ORCID: Khan, Arif Ali
Shameem, Mohammad
Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan
Hussain, Shahid
Yan, Xuefeng
Venue: Applied Soft Computing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2019-10
Volume: 83
Pages: 105648
ISSN: 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648
OpenAlex: W2965033383
Cited by: 126
References: 76
Citations by year: 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 1
FWCI: 26.44
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (1015-YAH18056, 41401010201, 41401010401)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords: distributed software development, software process improvement, success factors, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, factor prioritization, taxonomy (general classification scheme), multi-criteria decision making, expert opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks