The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Düllmann et al. [24] and some other researchers [69], [78], [81] considered neglecting change control in security most challenging factor of DevOps.”
From Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“We reviewed those studies briefly and extracted all the challenging factors including lack of secure coding standards [2], [23], [80], [81], using unsuitable performance metrics for security evaluation [2], [69], [78], [79] and lack of integrated testing tools to secure DevOps [14], [52], [53], [71].”
From Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cites
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L., & Kearns, K. P. (1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,407
Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP
Chang, D.-Y. (1996) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 · Cited by 4,874
The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0062 · Cited by 1,340
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
Wang, J., Chakraborty, C., & Ouyang, H. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/9781599048437.ch003 · Cited by 1,334
Herbsleb, J. D., & Moitra, D. (2001) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.914732 · Cited by 1,059
A discipline for software engineering
(1995) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)90062-4 · Cited by 1,018
IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology
(1990) · doi:10.1109/ieeestd.1990.101064 · Cited by 995
The Capability Maturity Model for Software
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (2011) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1109/9781118156667.ch2 · Cited by 801
Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment
Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., & Yazdankhah, A. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063 · Cited by 604
Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A Zadeh
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1996) · Cited by 559
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- M. Kuhrmann, C. Konopka, P. Nellemann, P. Diebold, J. Münch, Software process improvement: where is the evidence?: initial findings from a systematic mapping study, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process.
- P. Abrahamsson, Measuring the success of software process improvement: the dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.4645, 2013. · arXiv
- M. Bano, N. Ikram, Software process improvement: A systematic literature review, in: 15th International Multitopic Conference, INMIC, 2012, pp. 459–464. · DOI
- Ayhan, 2013, Fuzzy topsis application for supplier selection problem, Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manag., 5, 159
- IEEE, 1991, Standards coordinating committee of the IEEE Computer Society
- N. Baddoo, T. Hall, D. Wilson, Implementing a people focused SPI programme, in: 11th European Software Control and Metrics Conference, 2000, pp. 373–382.
- N. Bunditwongrat, T. Mathupayas, N. Atcharawan, An empirical framework of key success factors for software process improvement, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management & Evaluation, 2011, pp. 82–90.
- Kabir, 2011, Comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for multicriteria inventory classification, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Syst., 1, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements
Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738 · Cited by 1,088
Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution
Madjid Tavana, D., Soltanifar, M., & Santos‐Arteaga, F. J. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04432-2 · Cited by 327
Quantum computing challenges in the software industry. A fuzzy AHP-based approach
Awan, U., Hannola, L., Tandon, A., Goyal, R. K., & Dhir, A. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106896 · Cited by 163
Saeidi, P., Mardani, A., Mishra, A. R., Cajas, V., & Galarraga-Carvajal, M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133380 · Cited by 121
Mahmoudi, A., Javed, S. A., & Mardani, A. (2021) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-021-00178-z · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Hussain, S., & Yan, X.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Arif Ali
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 105648
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965033383
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 26.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (1015-YAH18056, 41401010201, 41401010401)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- distributed software development, software process improvement, success factors, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, factor prioritization, taxonomy (general classification scheme), multi-criteria decision making, expert opinion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
