Cited by 37Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Reinforcement learning strategy for spacecraft attitude hyperagile tracking control with uncertainties

Zheng, Mohong, Wu, Yunhua, Li, Chaoyong·2021·Aerospace Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107126

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, M., Wu, Y., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Yunhua
  • Li, Chaoyong
Venue
Aerospace Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
119
Pages
107126
ISSN
1270-9638 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203239815
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aerospace Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61973153)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR20F030003)
  • Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
reinforcement learning, sliding mode observer, disturbance rejection, periodic disturbances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review