Cited by 43Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Reinforcement-learning-based fixed-time attitude consensus control for multiple spacecraft systems with model uncertainties

Chen, Run-Ze, Li, Yuan-Xin, Ahn, Choon Ki·2023·Aerospace Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ast.2022.108060

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, R.-Z., Li, Y.-X., & Ahn, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Liaoning University of Technology (CN)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Yuan-Xin
  • Ahn, Choon Ki
Venue
Aerospace Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
132
Pages
108060
ISSN
1270-9638 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311453044
Cited by
43
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aerospace Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
model uncertainty, reinforcement learning, neural network control, leader state estimation, Lyapunov stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review