The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synchrotron radiation from the Crab Nebula discriminates between models of space–time foam
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More detailed calculations [222, 111, 221] show that in the case of the Crab nebula Equation (103) is correct”
From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [111]
Citations
Cites
Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces
Georgi, H. M., & Glashow, S. L. (1974) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.32.438 · Cited by 4,528
Bound states of strings and p-branes
Witten, E. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00610-9 · Cited by 1,780
Tests of quantum gravity from observations of γ-ray bursts
Amelino-Camelia, G., Ellis, J., Mavromatos, N. E., Nanopoulos, D. V., & Sarkar, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31647 · Cited by 1,430
Self-citationLorentz Invariance with an Invariant Energy Scale
Magueijo, J., & Smolin, L. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.190403 · Cited by 1,226
AMELINO-CAMELIA, G. (2002) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271802001330 · Cited by 1,186
High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance
Coleman, S., & Glashow, S. L. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.116008 · Cited by 1,149
Bound states of strings and p-branes
Witten, E. H. (1995) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,090
Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time
Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.124021 · Cited by 960
Potential Sensitivity of Gamma-Ray Burster Observations to Wave Dispersion in VacuoPreprint
Giovanni Amelino-camelia, A., Ellis, J. R., Mavromatos, N. E., Nanopoulos, D. V., & Sarkar, S. (1997) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9712103 · Cited by 766
Self-citationGiovanni Amelino-camelia, A. (2000) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 711
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Ellis, 1994, vol. 31(1)
- For reviews see: L. Smolin, arXiv:hep-th/0303185 and references therein · arXiv
- F.W. Stecker, arXiv:astro-ph/0304527 and references therein · arXiv
- J.R. Ellis, N.E. Mavromatos, D.V. Nanopoulos, A. Sakharov, arXiv:gr-qc/0312044 · arXiv
- S. Liberati, T.A. Jacobson, D. Mattingly, arXiv:hep-ph/0110094 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance
Mattingly, D. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-5 · Cited by 1,061
“More detailed calculations [222, 111, 221] show that in the case of the Crab nebula Equation (103) is correct, although the argument of [153] does not necessarily hold in general.”
BackgroundQuantum-Spacetime Phenomenology
Giovanni Amelino-camelia, A. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-5 · Cited by 886
“Another opportunity to set limits on test theories with Planck-scale modified dispersion relations is provided by the study of the implications of modified dispersion relations for synchrotron radiation [306, 62, 309, 378, 231, 420, 39].”
BackgroundTests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update
Liberati, S. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/13/133001 · Cited by 492
“A class of models showing modified dispersion relations of the general form (equation (52)) was derived from the Liouville string approach to quantum spacetime [226, 50, 52].”
MethodLorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena, and astrophysical constraints
Ted Jacobson, A., Liberati, S., & Mattingly, D. (2005) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.06.004 · Cited by 369
“This result was independently confirmed by [106] from the starting point of the Dirac equation.”
ResultLorentz violation at high energy: concepts, phenomena and astrophysical constraintsPreprint
Ted Jacobson, A., Liberati, S., & Mattingly, D. (2005) · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, J. R., Mavromatos, N. E., & Sakharov, A. S.
- Affiliations
- European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
- University of London (GB)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Sakharov, A.S
- Venue
- Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 669-682
- ISSN
- 0927-6505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107380554
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- synchrotron radiation, Crab Nebula, spacetime foam, quantum gravity, modified dispersion relations, electron dispersion relation, photon dispersion relation, equivalence principle, synchrotron spectrum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
