Cited by 447EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Koltovskaia, Svetlana·2020·Assessing Writing

DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,212
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Untitled work
(2008) · Cited by 7,674
Case study research: Design and methods
McCorcle, M. D., & Bell, E. L. (1986) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(86)90052-2 · Cited by 5,884
Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
Gass, S. M., Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606006 · Cited by 969
AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. C. (2004) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01972.x · Cited by 641
Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -
(1998) · doi:10.3115/980845 · Cited by 636

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Ranalli, J., & Yamashita, T. (2019, March). Synchronous automated written corrective feedback: Effects on L2 college students’ revision behavior and text quality. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Annual Conference.

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 366

A Latent Profile Analysis of Vocational L2 Learners’ Engagement With GenAI Feedback: Associations With Metacognitive Strategies and Writing Performance
Lu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70241 · Cited by 3
AI-Powered Writing Tools: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Tertiary Students’ Usage
Candilas, K. S., Japson, M. C. N., Bartolata, V. D., Amores, D. J. R., Abas, S. R., & Getuaban, P. A. M. (2024) · AsiaCALL Online Journal · doi:10.54855/acoj.241523 · Cited by 6
A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Engagement in Educational Settings
Qiao, L., & Rameli, M. R. M. (2024) · Sains Humanika · doi:10.11113/sh.v16n3.2126 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Chinese AWCF Platform’s value in improving CSL learners’ writing performance in a ChatGPT context
Yang, Y., & Tian, Y. (2024) · Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報) The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association USA · doi:10.1075/csl.24008.yan · Cited by 3
« Peux-tu rendre mon texte plus allemand ? » – Écrire en langue seconde avec l’intelligence artificielle
Roussel, S., & Ochoa, M. (2025) · Alsic · doi:10.4000/13cv6 · Cited by 9
Rhetorical shifts in the AI age: A Metadiscourse analysis of applied linguistics master’s theses in the Chinese EFL context
Hong, L. (2026) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2026.101508 · Cited by 3
Feedback on writing through the lens of activity theory: An exploration of changes to peer-to-peer interactions
Carr, N. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100720 · Cited by 5
Embracing Advances in AI-Based Language Tools in EAP Programs
Danilina, E. A., & Pichon, E. L. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-8761-7.ch005 · Cited by 4
Reducing English Major Students’ Writing Errors With an Automated Writing Evaluation System: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Technology
Cai, B., He, Z., Fu, H. C., Zheng, Y., & Song, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3547321 · Cited by 4
The analytic use of rubrics in writing classes by language students in an EFL context: students’ writing model and benefits
Dahmash, N. F. B. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1588046 · Cited by 3
Modern Technology Usage For Education Field During COVID-19: Statistical Analysis
Joson, N. M., Jayakumar, A., & Jayapandian, N. (2022) · International Conference on Communication, Computing and Industry 4.0 (C2I4) · doi:10.1109/c2i456876.2022.10051242 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Potential of Using an AI Language Model for Automated Essay ScoringPreprint
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2uahv · Cited by 4
Effectiveness of automated corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing proficiency and perception
Shang, H. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2347318 · Cited by 2
Supporting Independent Writers: How Grammarly Shapes Learner Autonomy and Writing Performance in the Ecuadorian Foreign Language Context
Estrella, F. (2025) · Social Education Research · doi:10.37256/ser.6120255896 · Cited by 4
Grammarly Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing: Feedback Precision and Student Perceptions
Hoang, G. T. L., & Van, K. T. G. (2025) · EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods · doi:10.59652/jetm.v3i2.469 · Cited by 2
Cognitive Processes of Foreign Language Learners in AI-Assisted Second Language Writing
赵, 雨. (2025) · Advances in Education · doi:10.12677/ae.2025.1571315 · Cited by 2
ERNIE-assisted feedback and its impact on EFL learners’ revision strategies and writing performance
Wang, Y., & Xie, Q. (2025) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2599787 · Cited by 3
Revisiting Dialogic Feedback in the Age of GenAI: An Investigation Into L2 Writers’ Feedback Seeking Interactions
Yan, D. “., Kasuma, S. A. A., & Amini, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4871-2_14 · Cited by 2
Student engagement with written feedback in second language writing: a systematic methodological review
Qian, J., Li, D., & Li, S. (2026) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2025-0264 · Cited by 4
Generative AI-Driven Feedback in Flipped Writing Workshops: Transforming Business Education Through Improved Writing, Communication, and Self-Regulation
Salem, A. A. M. S. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261431156 · Cited by 5
ESL tertiary learners’ engagement in ChatGPT-assisted second language writing
Shujun, Y. U. A. N., & Dao, P. (2026) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2026.2652333 · Cited by 4
Exploring the Dynamics of Learners’ Engagement With Generative Artificial Intelligence in Second Language Argumentative Writing
ZHANG, Z., & Liu, T. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70217 · Cited by 2
What Are We Missing in AI‐Supported L2 Writing Research? A Systematic Review From 2014 to 2024
Tang, W., Wang, Z., & Guangfen, Y. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70262 · Cited by 2
Measuring Chinese undergraduate students’ engagement with GenAI feedback in L2 writing: a large-scale study
Yao, Y., Rong, M., Chen, X., & Zhu, X. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2683868 · Cited by 2
Tradução e validação de conteúdo do instrumento para avaliação da Gestão do Conhecimento holística
Corrêa, F., Carvalho, D. B. F., Zaidan, F. H., Ribeiro, J. S. D. A. N., & de Faria, V. F. (2022) · Em Questão · doi:10.19132/1808-5245284.121287 · Cited by 2
Writing
Leow, R. P., Manchón, R. M., & Polio, C. G. (2022) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal.3.13leo · Cited by 2
Synthesizing the Attributes of Computer-Based Error Analysis for ESL and EFL Learning: A Scoping Review
Mariappan, R., Tan, K. H., Yang, J., Jian, C., & Chang, P. K. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142315649 · Cited by 2
Indonesian students’ engagement in online EFL writing class and their perceptions on teacher feedback
Mafulah, S., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2023) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58279 · Cited by 6
Expressing Ideas: AI-Integrated Paraphrasing to Students’ Writing Skills
Malon, J. C., Virtudazo, J.-A., Vallente, W., Ayop, L., & Malon, M. F. O. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Methodology · doi:10.12973/ijem.10.4.531 · Cited by 2
From digital divide to equity-enhancing diffusion: Generative AI and writing quality
Forster, R. T., Kee, K. F., & Li, G. M. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02739-3 · Cited by 2
انواع بازخورد، انتقال معنا و انتقال ساختار در نگارش مشارکتی زبان انگلیسی در بستر تعاملات رایانه ای چند رسانه ای و متن-محور
پوردانا, ن., & زنوزق, ز. م. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22059/jflr.2021.321348.825 · Cited by 2
Native and non-native speakers’ reaction to Grammarly-flagged errors: Implications for L2 teaching of writing
Ebyary, K. E. (2022) · Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.56040/ebya1921 · Cited by 2
Investigating the impact of automated instruments used for assessing the writing skill: Perspectives of language e-learners
Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2024) · Research Journal in Advanced Humanities · doi:10.58256/4fd2qt78 · Cited by 2
ChatGPT vs Bard: Which is a Better Writer?
Ng, A. L., & Ong, J. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00066 · Cited by 3
Does Increasing Reliance on Artificial Intelligence Boost Creativity? Assessing AI-Augmented Creativity with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Chen, J., Brandimarte, L., & Susarla, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4898166 · Cited by 2
Overview of methodological procedures in research on written corrective feedback processing
Coyle, Y., Nicolás‐Conesa, F., & Cerezo, L. (2023) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal.5.03coy · Cited by 1
Analyzing teachers’ perceptions of the impact of Moodle personalized positive feedback on foreign language students’ motivation and engagement
Aissi, R., & Mouas, S. (2024) · XLinguae · doi:10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.09 · Cited by 1
Impact of Research-Informed Integration of AWE Among Chinese EFL Undergraduates
Huang, S. H., & Chen, D. (2024) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v14n2p26 · Cited by 1
ENHANCING WRITING SKILLS OF EFL LEARNERS THROUGH AUTOMATED FEEDBACK: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
Pariyanto, & Tungka, N. F. (2024) · Jurnal Ilmiah Spectral · doi:10.47255/gymtcf78 · Cited by 1
EFL Students’ Perceptions on Grammarly Use in Proofreading Essay Tasks
Wahyu, T. A., & Zur, S. (2024) · AL LUGHAWIYAAT · doi:10.31332/alg.v4i2.8046 · Cited by 1
Navigating the “Cooked” Data: A Framework for Understanding GenAI's Impact on Academic Writing and Learning
Mei-seung, C. (2024) · International Conference e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies · doi:10.1145/3678610.3678630 · Cited by 1
Thai EFL University Students’ Writing in the Digital Age: Error Analysis Revisited
Chuanpipatpong, A. (2025) · PASAA · doi:10.58837/chula.pasaa.70.10 · Cited by 4
The Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Saudi Educational Settings
Albadry, H. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.394883 · Cited by 1
A Constructivist Perspective on the Use of Online AI-based Adaptive Learning and Feedback to Support L2 Writing Development
Woodworth, J. (2026) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08518-4_5 · Cited by 1
Enhancing foreign language learning through AI-driven telecollaboration
Mont, M., Dooly, M., & Masats, D. (2026) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2026.100153 · Cited by 5
An inquiry into Grammarly’s precision and recall: A comparative study with human annotators
Koltovskaia, S., Saeli, H., & Rahmati, P. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101283 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
An ecological approach to L2 learners’ engagement with written feedback
Long, Z., & Xu, J. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101028 · Cited by 1
Navigating contradictions: An activity theory-informed three-cycle action research study on a GAI-assisted EFL Writing model
Xuan, Q., Cai, J., Li, L., & Qin, L. (2026) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2026.104008 · Cited by 4
The Current State of GenAI in TESOL
Savvidou, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14502-4_3 · Cited by 1
The Rise of Digital Tutors: A Bibliometric Exploration of Intelligent Agent‐Supported Language Learning From 2005 to 2025
Huang, L., & Liu, M. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70529 · Cited by 2
Beyond the monorail perspective: constructing a dual-role engagement framework in peer feedback for second language oral communication
He, W., & Jin, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1804403 · Cited by 1
From ‘The system said’ to ‘my argument requires’: cultivating self-mediation with AWE feedback
Qu, P., Qu, Y., Dongmei, W. A. N. G., & Wang, R. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2639460 · Cited by 2
From Red Pen to Algorithm: How Do L2 Learners Engage with Human and Automated Feedback?
Zohali, L., Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (2026) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882261419844 · Cited by 2
Integrating AI in Teaching
Lin, D. L., Wei, Z., & Sun, R. H. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407442 · Cited by 1
Students’ psychological biases towards teacher and AI-generated feedback: an experimental study
Haiyan, Y. U. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04568-5 · Cited by 1
Investigating Chinese EAP learners’ usage and perceptions of generative AI in academic writing: A case study of a Sino-British university
He, H., & Tinsley, J. (2026) · Developing Academic Practice · doi:10.3828/dap.2026.11 · Cited by 1
Metacognitive Filtering and Cognitive Offloading in AI-Assisted L2 Writing: A PRISMA Guided Process-Tracing Synthesis
Alghamdi, L. H., & Alghizzi, T. M. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16071229 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Relationship Between Student Engagement and Authentic Learning During COVID-19
Hossain, S. F. A., Sofyan, Y., Ushie, A. M., & Srimuang, K. (2022) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.295149 · Cited by 1
CONVENTIONAL WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR EFL LEARNERS' WRITING SKILL ENHANCEMENT
Dewi, A. K., Putri, E., & Widiawati, U. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Best Practices · doi:10.31258/ijebp.v7n2.p172-188 · Cited by 1
Teachers’ Feedback Practices, Students’ Engagement and Academic Adjustment: Moderating Effects of Gender
Amedu, A. N., & Dwarika, V. M. (2023) · International Journal of Home Economics Hospitality and Allied Research · doi:10.57012/ijhhr.v2n2.003 · Cited by 1
Developing Research Literacy in Language Teacher Education
Fürstenberg, U. (2024) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004689992_015 · Cited by 1
Automating task design: bridging the gap between second language research and L2 instruction
Castellví, J., Gilabert, R., & Comelles, E. (2024) · TEISEL Tecnologías para la investigación en segundas lenguas · doi:10.1344/teisel.v3.45855 · Cited by 1
Exploring Learner Engagement with the AWE-Peer-Teacher Feedback Mode in L2 Writing
Zhou, S., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4246-2_3 · Cited by 2
Student Engagement With Teacher Written Feedback in Online EFL Writing Context
Linuwih, E. R., Setiawan, S., & Munir, A. (2024) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.1407.26 · Cited by 1
First-Year Students’ Usage of and Attitudes Towards Mindless and Mindful AI-Technology
Delcker, J., Heil, J., Ifenthaler, D., Seufert, S., & Spirgi, L. (2024) · Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66462-5_2 · Cited by 1
University Students’ Engagement with Feedback in a Quiz Platform: A Case Study of Quizizz
Le, M. T. T., & Tran, K. V. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/4rbt5151 · Cited by 9
L’utilisation de ChatGPT 3.5 pour la rétroaction corrective écrite interactive en enseignement-apprentissage du français langue seconde : une étude exploratoire
Holmes, T. (2024) · Actes des Journées de linguistique · doi:10.70637/xvc8m613 · Cited by 1
Analyzing the Potential of AI-Powered Writing Evaluation Tools for Developing Students' Analytical Skills
Maltseva, S. N., & Pavlova, A. (2025) · Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf64229.2025.10948096 · Cited by 1
A Case Study in Mindfully Integrating AI Tools into Writing Classes
Dreschler, G., Gambrel, A., & Branum, J. (2025) · Journal of Academic Writing · doi:10.18552/joaw.v15is2.1117 · Cited by 1
Lecturers’ Perception on English Ability Towards the Lecturers’ Professionalism
Afriani, R. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210914.027 · Cited by 1
Cognitive Conflicts Emerged from Feedback from Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence
Rizqa, K., Drajatı, N. A., & Putra, K. A. (2022) · AL-HAYAT Journal of Islamic Education · doi:10.35723/ajie.v6i2.256 · Cited by 1
Bibliometrically and systematically analyzing automated writing evaluation for English learning
Wu, T., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Forum for Linguistic Studies · doi:10.59400/fls.v5i3.1907 · Cited by 1
Error Flagging Tools and Online Revision Behaviour: Evidence from Native and Non-native Speakers
Ebyary, K. E. (2022) · CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education · doi:10.21608/opde.2022.255403
Digital Writing Practices in the Information Age: Possibilities and Implications for English Language Teachers and Learners
Özer, Ö., & Yükselir, C. (2022) · English language education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13540-8_11 · Cited by 3
Frontiers in Explainable Automated Writing Evaluation
Inui, K., Ishii, Y., Matsubayashi, Y., Inoue, N., Naito, S., Isobe, Y., Funayama, H., & KIKUCHI, S. (2023) · IEICE ESS FUNDAMENTALS REVIEW · doi:10.1587/essfr.16.4_289
Literacy's Levels: An Analysis of Neoliberal Literacy Sponsorship in the U.S.
Fuller, M. D. (2022) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.5847
Written Corrective Feedback Scientometric Review (1987–2022)
Wang, X., Zuo, J., & Wang, X. (2023) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol14no3.6
Does Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Improve Students’ Writing? Focus on Technical Aspects and Readability
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, U. T. M. T., Zulkornain, L. H., Mat, A. C., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2023) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.10.1974
Stealth Assessment in Game-Based and Task-Based Language Teaching
Liu, D., Ji, H., & Kliger, D. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0568-3.ch013
Student Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Using Error Logs to Promote Feedback ProcessingPreprint
Lau, W. M. E., Aubrey, S., & Ellis, R. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4634974
Keynote: Butting Heads and the Agency to Yield: Maverick Considerations in the Writing Center
Martini, R. H. (2023) · The Writing center journal · doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1950
Affordances of Technology-Mediated Assessment in English as a Foreign Language Writing in Higher Education: A Scoping ReviewPreprint
Pasaribu, T. A., Finefter‐Rosenbluh, I., & Chowdhury, R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4691199
Enhancing English Students’ Writing Skills with Technology Tools: A Qualitative Study
Dewi, R. S., Hidayat, D. N., & Zulfa, S. (2023) · International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) · doi:10.1109/citsm60085.2023.10455378
وجهات نظر طالبات معهد اللغة العربية لغير الناطقين بها حول استخدام تطبيق قائم على الذكاء الاصطناعي (قلم) لتحسين الكتابة الأكاديمية
الغامدي, أ. ع. ا., & الفراني, د. ل. أ. (2024) · Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.33193/jalhss.101.2024.1041
A teacher’s inquiry into diagnostic assessment in an EAP writing course
Qayyum, R. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100848
The Effect of Metacognitive Instruction with Written Corrective Feedback on Secondary Students’ Engagement and Functional Adequacy in L2 WritingPreprint
Kim, M., & Hiver, P. V. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4857895
Generative AI-Human Collaboration in Higher Education
Jha, B., Devanesan, M. D., Jha, D., & Giri, P. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6806-0.ch020 · Cited by 1
Diagnosing EFL writers’ development of discourse competence in disciplinary writing: an ecological approach
Yu-min, W., & Xie, Q. (2024) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2024-0046
Implementation of Lettersmith to improve the writing process among graduate-level public health students: Results from a pilot evaluation study
Zamora, A. N., August, E. T., & Anderson, O. S. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10456-3
Analysing online peer editing behaviours and their relationship with students’ short-term and long-term writing improvement
Zhang, H., Fanguy, M., Courtney, M. G. R., Baldwin, M., Shulgina, G., Адамович, К., & Costley, J. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2476559
Is Grammarly useful for improving essay-writing skills? Ecuadorian undergraduate polytechnic students’ viewpoints
Estrella, F. (2025) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-10-2024-0529 · Cited by 2
The Future of ESP Research
Belcher, D. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119985068.ch33
Describing The Relationship Between Text Habits And Spelling Competency Among Bsed English Students
Yangyang, S. R., Pesalbon, M. D., Suarez, A. P. A., & Naparan, G. B. (2024) · Beyond Words · doi:10.33508/bw.v12i2.6121
Students' Perspectives on the Grammarly Application in English Writing Classes
Phan, T. N. L. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7260-9.ch009
AWE for Formative Purposes in the EFL Context:
Peñarroja, M. R. (2025) · International Journal of English Studies · doi:10.6018/ijes.611761
Understanding the Impact of Human-Computer Feedback on Academic Engagement and Writing Performance in the Context of Chinese English as a Foreign Language LearningPreprint
Li, L., Li, J., Guo, B., & Zhu, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5378799
Large Language Model-supported Intelligent Evaluation of Open-ended Tasks: Case Studies and Reflections Based on SOU
Lin, D. L., Wei, Z., Sun, R. H., & Liu, Q. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste64638.2025.11091932
Teachers' Feedback and Students' Emotional Wellbeing in Writing Teachers' Feedback and Students' Emotional Wellbeing in Writing Courses CoursesPreprint
Sherma, A. B. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5376296 · Cited by 1
Empirical Studies on Automated Writing Feedback Tools in University-Level English Teaching: A Literature Review
Faktorová, B. (2024) · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0751-2024-1
Integrating move analysis and sentence reconstruction in automated writing evaluation for L2 academic writers
Mau, B.-R., & Feng, H.-H. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100984

Authors: Koltovskaia, S.
Affiliations: Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author: Koltovskaia, Svetlana
ORCID: Koltovskaia, Svetlana
Venue: Assessing Writing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2020-04
Volume: 44
Pages: 100450
ISSN: 1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
OpenAlex: W3011057862
Cited by: 447
References: 45
Citations by year: 2026: 133 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI: 121.15
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords: Grammarly, student engagement, automated writing evaluation, second language writing, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, feedback acceptance, technology dependence, draft revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks