Cited by 447EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Koltovskaia, Svetlana·2020·Assessing Writing

DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,212
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Untitled work
(2008) · Cited by 7,674
Case study research: Design and methods
McCorcle, M. D., & Bell, E. L. (1986) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(86)90052-2 · Cited by 5,884
Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
Gass, S. M., Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606006 · Cited by 969
AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. C. (2004) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01972.x · Cited by 641
Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -
(1998) · doi:10.3115/980845 · Cited by 636

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Ranalli, J., & Yamashita, T. (2019, March). Synchronous automated written corrective feedback: Effects on L2 college students’ revision behavior and text quality. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Annual Conference.

Sorted by citations

Items 301–366 of 366

Using screen-cast to explore language learners’ engagement with teacher oral feedback across time
Liu, J., & Su, W. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251368646
The Peer in the Machine: Evaluating the Impact of a “Peer-Like” AI Persona on Writing Motivation in Low-Proficiency L2 Learners
Mai, X. (2025) · Open Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.4236/ojapps.2025.1511235
Exploring Moroccan EFL Students' Attitudes Toward AWCF
Bakir, M., Anasse, K., Boudribila, W., Ghraoui, H. E., Zoubairi, T., & Edder, Y. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4621-2.ch007
The impact of ICT-supported collaborative writing on Vietnamese EFL students’ descriptive essay performance: a quasi-experimental study
Hà, N. T. T., & Nhung, P. T. H. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2599155
Additional file 1 of First-year students AI-competence as a predictor for intended and de facto use of AI-tools for supporting learning processes in higher education
Delcker, J., Heil, J., Ifenthaler, D., Seufert, S., & Spirgi, L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26690500
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Language Learning
Javed, F. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0275-1.ch001
The role of artificial intelligence in transforming the writing process: Benefits, limitations, and future opportunities
Shahbazi, Z., Mohammadkarimi, E., Yousefiazar, S., & Othman, K. (2025) · Journal of Digital Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/jdet/17480 · Cited by 1
The Moderating Role of Cognitive Style (FD/FI) on the Relationship Between Cultural Information Preference and English Writing Performance
Deng, Y. (2025) · Language Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.35207/later.1775058
Using AI Applications to Enhance EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Empirical Evidence from “Monica”Preprint
Parviz, M., & Azizi, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5968394
Human and AI Scoring of EFL Writing: The Influence of Rubrics and Genre on Reliability
Taşçı, S. (2025) · Eğitim ve Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi · doi:10.52974/jena.1785369
Student Engagement with ChatGPT and Teacher Feedback in L2 Writing
Liang, J. (2026) · International Journal of Changes in Education · doi:10.47852/bonviewijce62026891
Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Student Engagement in South African Open Distance Learning: A Systematic Review
Zenda, R., & Dewa, A. (2025) · Progressio South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice · doi:10.25159/2663-5895/17443
Generative Artificial Intelligence's Impact on English Language Education
McDermott, B., & Ross, R. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3000-6.ch012
The AI Paradox in L2 Writing: Why Helpful Feedback Creates Unhelpful Dependency in Higher EducationPreprint
SEDDIKI, M., & Korichi, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8731897/v1
Unpacking the Role of Grammarly in Iterative Continuation Tasks to Develop L2 Grammar Learning Strategies, Grit, and Competence
Zhan, J., & Zhou, C. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2026-0104
The AI Paradox in L2 Writing: Why Helpful Feedback Creates Unhelpful Dependency in Higher EducationPreprint
SEDDIKI, M., & Korichi, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8731897/v2 · Cited by 2
The Evolving Landscape of AI in Language Education
Yaqin, L. N. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4397-6.ch001
Examining the Impact of Feedback from Automated Writing Evaluation Tools on Learners’ Grammar Accuracy
Hsu, H.-L. (2026) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.3138/calico-2024-0021
EXPLORING TEACHERS’ DISPOSITIONS TOWARD AI FEEDBACK ACCURACY AND THE REFINEMENT PROCESS AND THEIR ENHANCEMENT PRACTICES IN EFL WRITINGPreprint
Gündoğdu, B., & Merç, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6428286
From emotion to engagement: vietnamese efl teachers’ construals of learners’ socio-emotional competencies and classroom engagement
Hua, H. H., Phương, H. Y., Le, T. T., & Thùy, P. T. (2026) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2026.2645823
The influence of online peer review on EFL learners’ cohesion and coherence in narrative writing
Li, J., Guan, Y., Pack, A., Jia, W., Xia, W., & Wang, B. (2026) · Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1515/jccall-2025-0028
Ethical readiness and behavioral intention toward generative AI: student perspectives from STEM and non-STEM disciplines in Indonesian higher education
Qomariyah, N. N., & Heriyanni, E. (2026) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-05-2025-0100
Applications of artificial intelligence in English writing instruction: a bibliometric analysis of research trends and impacts
Xu, W., Abdullah, R., & Li, X. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2634424
Revisiting Students' Lack of Visible Response to Feedback in Second Language Writing
Tang, S., & Yu, S. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70626
Investigating the quality and quantity of feedback enactment in academic writing: Comparing automated writing evaluation with generative artificial intelligencePreprint
Yang, X., Carless, D. R., & Lin, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6643238
An Intelligent Approach in Exploring Brilliance Beyond the Bounds of Traditional Learning
Sree, C. K., Saishree, V., Jaiswal, R. K., Manchala, Y., Swain, N. K., & Anvesh, K. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on AI Engineering and Innovations (AIEI) · doi:10.1109/aiei69164.2026.11497900
The impacts of AI-powered language learning platforms on EFL writing proficiency: Emphasizing AI-generated automated corrective feedback
Etaat, F. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102869
A Study on the Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Senior High School English Writing Feedback
Yang, T. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.63313/ijed.9073
From a "Heavy Weight on My Shoulders" to "Reading a Text by a Stranger": Temporal Dynamics in AI-Assisted Writing FeedbackPreprint
Uzun, M., Demir, İ., & Höl, D. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9876127/v1
Junior high school students’ engagement with automated feedback in EFL writing: a case from China
Lin, Y., & Guo, Y. (2026) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2025-0122
Exploring EFL Learners’ Experiences with Automated and AI-Based Feedback Tools in Writing Classrooms
As'ary, M. A., & Syamsuddin, M. R. (2026) · DEIKTIS Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra · doi:10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3663
Kurdish EFL Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of ChatGPT's Usability as an Automated Written Corrective Feedback (AWCF) Tool: Evidence from Iraqi KurdistanPreprint
Azeez, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9794488/v1
Effects of feedback literacy scripts and a second-rater mechanism on EAP writing revision in generative AI-supported contexts
Yao, X.-C. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1835593
How Does GenAI Agency Drive Academic Engagement Among Second Language Learners? An Empirical Study Based on Self-Determination Theory
Li, Y. X. (2026) · Language Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.35207/later.1926446
Question-only AI Socratic dialogue as dialogic feedback in L2 argumentative writing: A quasi-experimental study
Wang, L.-J. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101331 · Cited by 2
Postface IA générative et Didactique des langues et des cultures : jalons pour une typologie des enjeux contemporains
Hamza-Jamann, A., & Lemoine, V. (2026) · Recherches en didactiques · doi:10.3917/rdid1.041.0113
A case study of applying Grammarly for mastering pre-service teachers' writing skills
Khrystych, N., Сушкевич, О. В., Акімова, А., & Akimova, A. (2025) · Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE) · doi:10.55056/ceur-ws.org/vol-4043/paper16.pdf
How EFL postgraduate students engage with automated written corrective feedback provided by Pigai in their academic writing?
Cai, B., Fu, H. C., He, Z., Wang, Y., & Song, Y. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2685747
Comparative Case Study of the Effectiveness of an Automated Writing Evaluation System in Improving Grammatical Accuracy Across Myanmar EFL Students of Varying English Proficiency Levels
Phyu, N. I., & Arya, T. (2026) · PASAA · doi:10.66947/pasaa.v72i1.2196
The effect of integrated asynchronous written corrective feedback and dialogic feedback on EFL students' argumentative essays: A quasi-experimental study
Suhartoyo, E., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Hamat, A., Ismiatun, F., Afrilyasanti, R., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Science Journal · doi:10.31893/multiscience.2026808
Developing L2 writing student self-assessment literacy through AI-generated feedback and AI chain-of-thought: An action research study with lower-proficiency university EFL learners
Ye, P., Yu, S., LEE, I. B. H., & LIANG, C. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105716
Virtual reality-enhanced collaborative learning and self-reported metacognitive awareness in a Chinese EFL context: the mediating role of social interaction and the moderating role of learner engagement
Zhang, Y., Wang, F., & Zhou, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1852175
The role of psychological contract in sustaining learner engagement with AWE systems
Hu, X., Hu, J., Chen, S., & Li, Z. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101101
Automatická evaluace textu ve zpětné vazbě na akademické psaní v angličtině: zpráva o pilotáži
Faktorová, B. (2025) · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0864-2025-2
ChatGPT 5.5 as an Automated Corrective Feedback Tool: Effects on the Writing Performance of EFL Learners
Maqbali, A. A., & Taga, O. (2026) · Language, Technology, and Social Media. · doi:10.70211/ltsm.3026-7196.737
Penny: Transition Network Analysis of Learner-Chatbot Interactions in Scaffolded EFL Writing
Woollaston, S., Flanagan, B., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34157-0_13
AI writing assistants and their effect on EFL writing quality.
Mela, A. J. L. (2026) · Latitude · doi:10.55946/latitude.v2i24.293
Writing without screens: Exploring EFL education students’ anxiety and self-reliance in a low-tech, non-AI writing environment
Anggoro, K. J., Shitadevi, I. A., & Pratiwi, D. I. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103474
Designing a scaffolded GenAI revision environment for EMI academic writing: a randomized active-control study of no-ai transfer and feedback use
Huang, S. Y. B. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2713874
AI-Augmented Self-Assessment in TEFL
Charles, T. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9639-2.ch014
Reconceptualizing Assessment Autonomy in TEFL
Köksal, D., Genç, L. G., & Uygun, E. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9639-2.ch001
Proposing a Responsible AI-Assisted EFL Writing Framework for Novice Academic Knowledge Construction
Nguyen, H. N. Y., Lang, T. S., Nguyen, T. T. M., Pham, T. G. B., & Anh, L. N. N. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8919-6.ch008
A self-regulated learning perspective on L2 learners’ engagement with peer feedback in writing
Cheng, X., & Teng, L. S. (2026) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-026-09495-9
Chinese EFL learners’ agency in GenAI-assisted speech learning: a qualitative study through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory
Diao, H. (2026) · Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1515/jccall-2026-0007
Student Engagement with genAI Feedback in L2 Writing: Evidence from Chinese Students’ Engagement with Kimi Feedback
Yang, X., & Liu, X. (2026) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2026.179099
AI-peer integrated feedback in second language writing classes: exploring students’ engagement and writing performance
Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1871951
AI-mediated writing and durable learning: a psychological theory of calibration, bypassing and uptake
Lan, Z., & Niu, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1866062 · Cited by 1
Advancing ESL Learner Writing Proficiency Through Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence Tools
Surve, A., Tiwari, G. H., Varia, D., Neelambaram, B., Fatma, G., & Khatoon, K. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1383-0.ch016
LLM-Assisted Development of AI Automated Written Assessment Systems for LLMs Using a Decoupled LTI-CGI Architecture
Zabala, I. D., Ribalta, C. T., & Mataix, J. B. (2026) · IEEE Digital Education and MOOCS Conference (DEMOcon) · doi:10.1109/democon70840.2026.11707943
CO-CHAIR: A Multi-Party Human-AI Interactional Framework for Collaborative Writing Workshops
Young-Ng, M., Minnillo, S., Whithaus, C., & Wang, H. (2026) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3785651.3831418
Cued retrospective reporting supported by eye tracking measures to uncover strategies for the optimal use of peer feedback
Meenen, F. V., Coertjens, L., Verschuren, F., Catrysse, L., & Masson, N. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101692
Exploring teachers’ dispositions toward AI feedback accuracy and the refinement process and their enhancement practices in EFL writing
Gündoğdu, B., & Merç, A. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101135
AI-mediated tools in primary English language education: a scoping review of pedagogical functions and teacher orchestration
Li, M., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1968516
From product scoring to online language processing: associations of AI-supported process feedback with pausing and revision trajectories in L2 writing
Wu, J., Kasim, Z. M., & Razak, F. N. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1951427
Engagement or disengagement: understanding the emotional dynamics of EFL learners in GenAI-assisted writing from the sociocultural perspective
Wu, K., Yang, M., & Lin, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934782
Whose English Does Generative AI Improve? Algorithmically Mediated Unequal Englishes in the Workplace
Tarrayo, V. N. (2026) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/23294884261500740

Authors: Koltovskaia, S.
Affiliations: Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author: Koltovskaia, Svetlana
ORCID: Koltovskaia, Svetlana
Venue: Assessing Writing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2020-04
Volume: 44
Pages: 100450
ISSN: 1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
OpenAlex: W3011057862
Cited by: 447
References: 45
Citations by year: 2026: 133 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI: 121.15
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords: Grammarly, student engagement, automated writing evaluation, second language writing, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, feedback acceptance, technology dependence, draft revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks