Cited by 447EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Koltovskaia, Svetlana·2020·Assessing Writing

DOI 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,212
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Untitled work
(2008) · Cited by 7,674
Case study research: Design and methods
McCorcle, M. D., & Bell, E. L. (1986) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(86)90052-2 · Cited by 5,884
Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
Gass, S. M., Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606006 · Cited by 969
AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. C. (2004) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01972.x · Cited by 641
Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -
(1998) · doi:10.3115/980845 · Cited by 636

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Ranalli, J., & Yamashita, T. (2019, March). Synchronous automated written corrective feedback: Effects on L2 college students’ revision behavior and text quality. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Annual Conference.

Sorted by citations

ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: an exploratory investigation
Yan, D. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4 · Cited by 713
Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050 · Cited by 647
AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2 · Cited by 589
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0 · Cited by 449
The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of english as a second or foreign language
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T. J., Jacob, S. R., Du, Q., & Tate, T. P. (2023) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 · Cited by 427
The Affordances and Contradictions of AI-Generated Text for Writers of English as a Second or Foreign Language
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4404380 · Cited by 425
Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014 · Cited by 405
Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study
Mahapatra, S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9 · Cited by 398
AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools
Alharbi, W. (2023) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2023/4253331 · Cited by 286
AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges
Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13460 · Cited by 282
Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy
Barrot, J. S. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071 · Cited by 248
Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views
Jakesch, M., Bhat, A., Buschek, D., Zalmanson, L., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581196 · Cited by 265
Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2021) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586 · Cited by 351
A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344023000265 · Cited by 222
Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K-12 education: a systematic review
Crompton, H., Jones, M. V., & Burke, D. (2024) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2121344 · Cited by 213
Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers
Wang, C. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3 · Cited by 212
“One prominent application is automatic written evaluation (AWE), which comprises two main elements: a scoring engine producing automatic scores and a feedback engine delivering automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) (Koltovskaia, 2020).”
Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement
Koltovskaia, S., Rahmati, P., & Saeli, H. (2024) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130 · Cited by 241
Self-citation
L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust
Ranalli, J. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816 · Cited by 184
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence
Zhan, Y., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821 · Cited by 162
First-year students AI-competence as a predictor for intended and de facto use of AI-tools for supporting learning processes in higher education
Delcker, J., Heil, J., Ifenthaler, D., Seufert, S., & Spirgi, L. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00452-7 · Cited by 198
Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Language Education Research: Insights from Using OpenAI 's ChatGPT
Pack, A., & Maloney, J. S. (2023) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3253 · Cited by 140
Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective
Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103225 · Cited by 224
Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?
Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, A., Winarni, R., & Sumarwati, S. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13419 · Cited by 124
Automated writing evaluation systems: A systematic review of Grammarly, Pigai, and Criterion with a perspective on future directions in the age of generative artificial intelligence
Ding, L., & Zou, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12402-3 · Cited by 122
Elementary teachers' perceptions of automated feedback and automated scoring: Transforming the teaching and learning of writing using automated writing evaluation
Wilson, J., Ahrendt, C., Fudge, E. A., Raiche, A., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104208 · Cited by 118
How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing?
Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2021) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1879161 · Cited by 112
The effect of teacher support on academic engagement: The serial mediation of learning experience and motivated learning behavior
Sadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03045-7 · Cited by 125
Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment
Mizumoto, A., Shintani, N., Sasaki, M., & Teng, M. F. (2024) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116 · Cited by 104
Integrating technology into ESL/EFL writing through Grammarly
Barrot, J. S. (2022) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220966632 · Cited by 96
Using Artificial Intelligence in TESOL: Some Ethical and Pedagogical Considerations
Pack, A., & Maloney, J. S. (2024) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3320 · Cited by 122
Exploring EAP students' perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning
Kohnke, L. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279 · Cited by 126
L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study
Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y · Cited by 90
Learner interaction with, and response to, AI-programmed automated writing evaluation feedback in EFL writing: An exploratory study
Yang, H., Gao, C., & Shen, H. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11991-3 · Cited by 141
Student engagement with teacher written feedback: Insights from low-proficiency and high-proficiency L2 learners
Cheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102880 · Cited by 99
Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: experiences of Chinese EFL student writers
Jiang, L. G., & Yu, S. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1799824 · Cited by 88
How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement One Another in Myanmar EFL Students’ Writing
Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2 · Cited by 77
The role of an open artificial intelligence platform in modern neurosurgical education: a preliminary study
Sevgi, U. T., Erol, G., Doğruel, Y., Sönmez, O. F., Tubbs, R. S., & Güngör, A. (2023) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-023-01998-2 · Cited by 80
Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model
Mantello, P. A., Ho, T. M., Nguyen, M., & Vuong, Q. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01837-1 · Cited by 92
Exploring the Potential of Using an Ai Language Model for Automated Essay ScoringPreprint
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4373111 · Cited by 86
Using automated corrective feedback tools in language learning: a review study
Shadiev, R., & Feng, Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2153145 · Cited by 71
Advancing Students’ Academic Excellence in Distance Education: Exploring the Potential of Generative AI Integration to Improve Academic Writing Skills
Maphoto, K. B., Sevnarayan, K., Mohale, N. E., Suliman, Z., Ntsopi, T. J., & Mokoena, D. (2024) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.649 · Cited by 129
The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: opportunities and challenges in education
Ye, Y., Li, H., & Sawaengdist, A. (2024) · Language Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1515/cercles-2023-0006 · Cited by 100
Generative AI and English essay writing: exploring the role of ChatGPT in enhancing learners’ task engagement
Zare, J., Ranjbaran, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2025) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amaf045 · Cited by 78
Measuring undergraduate students’ reliance on generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation.
Hou, C., Zhu, G., Sudarshan, V., Lim, F. S., & Ong, Y. S. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329 · Cited by 70
Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Research Writing
Adams, D., & Chuah, K.-M. (2022) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003184157-9 · Cited by 81
Leveraging AI tools to develop the writer rather than the writing
Ingley, S. J., & Pack, A. (2023) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.05.007 · Cited by 65
University students’ engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback
Yeung, S. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203 · Cited by 70
Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62
Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study
Yao, Y., Wang, W., & Yang, X. (2021) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100568 · Cited by 63
Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision?
McCarthy, K. S., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100608 · Cited by 61
Analyzing Preceding factors affecting behavioral intention on communicational artificial intelligence as an educational tool
Cortez, P., Ong, A. K. S., Diaz, J. F. T., German, J. D., & Jagdeep, S. J. S. S. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25896 · Cited by 75
Understanding student engagement with teacher and peer feedback in L2 writing
Cheng, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, C. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103176 · Cited by 78
Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners' experiences and perceptions
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Su, F. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100371 · Cited by 109
Investigating students’ engagement in chatbot-supported classroom debates
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2207181 · Cited by 66
Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation
Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2 · Cited by 104
AI Language Models as Educational Allies: Enhancing Instructional Support in Higher Education
Zekaj, R. (2023) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.22.8.7 · Cited by 54
Potential Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Özer, M. (2024) · Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education · doi:10.14686/buefad.1416087 · Cited by 72
Automated writing evaluation use in second language classrooms: A research synthesis
Karatay, Y., & Karatay, L. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103332 · Cited by 49
Investigating student engagement with AI-driven feedback in translation revision: A mixed-methods study
Xu, S., Su, Y., & Liu, K. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13457-0 · Cited by 98
A synergetic perspective on students’ perception of classroom environment, expectancy value belief, and engagement in an EFL context
Vo, H. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221075781 · Cited by 56
Trends in automated writing evaluation systems research for teaching, learning, and assessment: A bibliometric analysis
Barrot, J. S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12083-y · Cited by 47
Generative AI for scalable feedback to multimodal exercises
Jürgensmeier, L., & Skiera, B. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.05.005 · Cited by 59
Using Peerceptiv to support AI-based online writing assessment across the disciplines
Li, A. W. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100746 · Cited by 44
Exploring the Effects of Automated Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Quality: A Mixed-Methods Study
Fan, N. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231181296 · Cited by 44
Comparing ChatGPT's correction and feedback comments with that of educators in the context of primary students' short essays written in English and Greek
Fokides, E., & Peristeraki, E. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12912-8 · Cited by 59
From process to product: writing engagement and performance of EFL learners under computer-generated feedback instruction
Shen, C., Shi, P., Guo, J., Xu, S., & Tian, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258286 · Cited by 42
Postsecondary L2 writing teachers’ use and perceptions of Grammarly as a complement to their feedback
Koltovskaia, S. (2022) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344022000179 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Investigating the Effects of UsingGrammarlyin EFL Writing: The Case of Articles
Ebadi, S., Gholami, M., & Vakili, S. (2022) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2022.2150067 · Cited by 52
Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective
Rahimi, M., Fathi, J., & Zou, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12896-5 · Cited by 89
Higher-proficiency students’ engagement with and uptake of teacher and Grammarly feedback in an EFL writing course
Thi, N. K., Nikolov, M., & Simon, K. (2022) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2022.2122476 · Cited by 45
Voluntary use of automated writing evaluation by content course students
Sarıcaoğlu, A., & Bilki, Z. (2021) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344021000021 · Cited by 50
Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles
Khabib, S. (2022) · Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal · doi:10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249 · Cited by 39
Leveraging the potential of ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation (AWE) tool: Students' feedback literacy development and AWE tools integration framework
Gozali, I., Wijaya, A. R. T., Lie, A., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2024) · The JALT CALL Journal · doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v20n1.1200 · Cited by 82
Exploring student engagement with artificial intelligence-guided chatbot feedback in EFL writing: interactions and revisions
Rong, M., Yao, Y., Li, Q., & Chen, X. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2539979 · Cited by 48
Using Grammarly to support students’ source-based writing practices
Dong, Y., & Shi, L. (2021) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100564 · Cited by 38
Exploring artificial intelligence using automated writing evaluation for writing skills
Abdul Rahman, N. A., Zulkornain, L. H., & Hamzah, N. H. (2022) · Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal · doi:10.21834/ebpj.v7isi9.4304 · Cited by 36
Long-Lasting Conceptual Change in Science Education
Li, X., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2021) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00288-x · Cited by 48
Computer or human: a comparative study of automated evaluation scoring and instructors’ feedback on Chinese college students’ English writing
Chen, H., & Pan, J. (2022) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-022-00171-4 · Cited by 33
It is like a friend to me: Critical usage of automated feedback systems by self-regulating English learners in higher education
Long, L., & Kim, M. (2024) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8821 · Cited by 55
Towards automated writing evaluation: A comprehensive review with bibliometric, scientometric, and meta-analytic approaches
Xue, Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12596-0 · Cited by 33
Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing
Zhang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100842 · Cited by 39
Toward a Motivation-Regulated Learner Engagement WCF Model of L2 Writing Performance
Tsao, J.-J., Tseng, W., Hsiao, T., Wang, C., & Gao, X. A. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211023172 · Cited by 35
Affective, behavioural, and cognitive engagement with written feedback on second language writing: a systematic methodological review
Pearson, W. S. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1285954 · Cited by 54
Help Me Reflect: Leveraging Self-Reflection Interface Nudges to Enhance Deliberativeness on Online Deliberation Platforms
Yeo, S., Lim, G., Gao, J., Zhang, W., & Perrault, S. T. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642530 · Cited by 43
INTEGRATING INSTAGRAM INTO EFL WRITING TO FOSTER STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
Prasetyawati, O. A., & Ardi, P. (2020) · Universitas Sanata Dharma Repository (Universitas Sanata Dharma) · Cited by 30
Exploring Learner Engagement With Multiple Sources of Feedback on L2 Writing Across Genres
Shi, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758867 · Cited by 45
Analysing learner engagement with native speaker feedback on an educational social networking site: an ecological perspective
Lyu, B., & Lai, C. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2030364 · Cited by 29
Investigating the Relationship Between Linguistic Competence, Ideal Self, Learning Engagement, and Integrated Writing Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Zhu, X., Yao, Y., Pang, W., & Zhu, S. (2022) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-022-09923-2 · Cited by 32
Feedback seeking abilities of L2 writers using ChatGPT: a mixed method multiple case study
Yan, D. “. (2024) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-09-2023-1933 · Cited by 33
Potentials and implications of ChatGPT for ESL writing instruction
Ibrahim, K., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2024) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7820 · Cited by 28
L2 Learner Cognitive Psychological Factors About Artificial Intelligence Writing Corrective Feedback
Wu, L., Wu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v14n10p70 · Cited by 31
Early prediction of writing quality using keystroke logging
Conijn, R., Cook, C. L., van Zaanen, M. M., & Waes, L. V. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00268-w · Cited by 26
The role of ChatGPT and grammarly in promoting emotion regulation, psychological well-being, motivation, and academic writing in Chinese college students: A self-determination theory perspective
Wang, C., Wang, B., & Xu, D. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102131 · Cited by 34
Has artificial intelligence rendered language teaching obsolete?
Handley, Z. L. (2024) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12929 · Cited by 35
Examining Second Language (L2) Learners’ Engagement with AWE-Teacher Integrated Feedback in a Technology-Empowered Context
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00877-8 · Cited by 31
Revisiting the conceptualizations of feedback in second language writing: a metaphor analysis approach
Yu, S., Yuan, K., & Wu, P. (2022) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100961 · Cited by 24
Facilitator or thinking inhibitor: understanding the role of ChatGPT-generated written corrective feedback in language learning
Guo, X. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2445177 · Cited by 23
ChatGPT-generated versus human direct corrective feedback on L2 writing
Muñoz Muñoz, B. C., Nassaji, H., & Bello Carrillo, F. I. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103805 · Cited by 22
Effects of speech-enabled corrective feedback technology on EFL speaking skills, anxiety and confidence
Shadiev, R., Feng, Y., Zhussupova, R. F., & Altınay, F. (2024) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2024.2430761 · Cited by 22

Authors: Koltovskaia, S.
Affiliations: Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author: Koltovskaia, Svetlana
ORCID: Koltovskaia, Svetlana
Venue: Assessing Writing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2020-04
Volume: 44
Pages: 100450
ISSN: 1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
OpenAlex: W3011057862
Cited by: 447
References: 45
Citations by year: 2026: 133 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI: 121.15
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords: Grammarly, student engagement, automated writing evaluation, second language writing, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, feedback acceptance, technology dependence, draft revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks