Cited by 9Smart Agriculture and AIAgricultural Engineering and MechanizationRobot Manipulation and Learning

Research on kiwifruit harvesting robot worldwide: A solution for sustainable development of kiwifruit industry

Open access
Tian, Zhiwei, Guo, Xiangyu, Ma, Wei, Xue, Xinyu·2025·Smart Agricultural Technology

Abstract

Kiwifruit harvesting is labor-intensive, and social issues like an aging population and a declining agricultural workforce have significantly increased costs, presenting unprecedented challenges to the industry. Automatic harvesting systems utilizing multi-sensor fusion, AI, and automation technologies show great potential for replacing manual labor in kiwi harvesting. This paper reviews over 140 research articles related to kiwi fruit harvesting robots, summarizing existing progress in two key areas: target fruit recognition and positioning systems, and fruit picking and collection systems. We compare the pros and cons of various methods, including traditional image recognition and deep learning, active and passive localization techniques, diverse end-effector design structure and driving mechanisms, robotic arm path planning, and harvesting systems. The results show that challenges remain in the commercialization of kiwi harvesting robots. The absence of a unified evaluation standard for robot performance makes the latest research achievements hard to be inherited, leading to slow advancements. Current algorithms are often not lightweight enough for low-cost embedded systems. Additionally, the reliance on manual labeling of dense targets and the accumulation of system error compromise the robustness of target recognition and spatial positioning in open environments. The existing studies tend to focus on local improvements rather than the entire harvesting system. So address…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atech.2025.100792

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual or multiple actuator configurations with a 2:1 redundancy ratio maintain capacity during faults, as demonstrated in manufacturing human-robot collaboration and agricultural systems.

    “For instance, dual or multiple actuator configurations with a 2:1 redundancy ratio maintain capacity during faults, as demonstrated in manufacturing HRC with reduced downtime [35] and agricultural systems with reliable uptime [9].”
  • Fault-tolerant cooperative robotics faces significant barriers in scalability, computational complexity, and real-world validation.

    “Fault-tolerant cooperative robotics faces significant barriers in scalability, computational complexity, and real-world validation, as highlighted across the literature.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, Z., Guo, X., Ma, W., & Xue, X.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ma, Wei
  • Xue, Xinyu
Venue
Smart Agricultural Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
10
Pages
100792
ISSN
2772-3755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406596370
Cited by
7
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Smart Agricultural Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (S2023009)
  • Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Support Program (2023JDRC0132)
  • Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP2024-34-IUA-10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
fruit detection, fruit localization, fruit harvesting, robotic arm path planning, multi-sensor fusion, embedded systems, agricultural labor shortage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review