Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review: Burden and severity of subclinical cardiovascular disease among those with nonalcoholic fatty liver; Should we care?

Oni, Ebenezer T., Agatston, Arthur S., Blaha, Michael J., Fialkow, Jonathan, Cury, Ricardo, Sposito, Andrei, Erbel, Raimund, Blankstein, Ron, Feldman, Ted, Al-Mallah, Mouaz H., Santos, Raul D., Budoff, Matthew J., Nasir, Khurram·2013·Atherosclerosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging disease and a leading cause of chronic liver disease. The prevalence in the general population is approximately 15-30% and it increases to 70-90% in obese or diabetic populations. NAFLD has been linked to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. It is therefore critical to evaluate the relationship between markers of subclinical CVD and NAFLD. METHOD An extensive search of databases; including the National Library of Medicine and other relevant databases for research articles meeting inclusion criteria: observational or cohort, studies in adult populations and clearly defined NAFLD and markers of subclinical CVD. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies were included in the review; 16 (59%) presented the association of NAFLD and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), 7 (26%) the association with coronary calcification and 7 (26%) the effect on endothelial dysfunction and 6 (22%) influence on arterial stiffness. CIMT studies showed significant increases among NAFLD patients compared to controls. These were independent of traditional risk factors and metabolic syndrome. The association was similar in coronary calcification studies. The presence of NAFLD is associated with the severity of the calcification. Endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness showed significant independent associations with NAFLD. Two studies argued the associations were not significant; however, these studies were limited to diabetic populations. CONCLUSION There is evidence to support the association of NAFLD with subclinical atherosclerosis independent of traditional risk factors and metabolic syndrome. However, there is need for future longitudinal studies to review this association to ascertain causality and include other ethnic populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.052

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Oni, E. T., Agatston, A. S., Blaha, M. J., Fialkow, J., Cury, R., Sposito, A., Erbel, R., Blankstein, R., Feldman, T., Al-Mallah, M. H., Santos, R. D., Budoff, M. J., & Nasir, K.
Venue
Atherosclerosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
230
Issue
2
Pages
258-267
ISSN
0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043412879
Cited by
352
References
5
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review: Burden and severity of subclinical cardiovascular disease among those with nonalcoholic fatty liver; Should we care? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.052
The paper
Oni, E. T., Agatston, A. S., Blaha, M. J., Fialkow, J., Cury, R., Sposito, A., Erbel, R., Blankstein, R., Feldman, T., Al-Mallah, M. H., Santos, R. D., Budoff, M. J., & Nasir, K. (2013). A systematic review: Burden and severity of subclinical cardiovascular disease among those with nonalcoholic fatty liver; Should we care? Atherosclerosis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.052

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.