Cited by 21Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Cardiorespiratory fitness and coronary artery calcification in women

Open access
DeFina, Laura, Radford, Nina, Leonard, David, Gibbons, Larry, Khera, Amit·2014·Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Introduction Cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) has been shown to be inversely associated with coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality. The cardioprotective mechanisms of fitness are not well defined. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between coronary artery calcification as a measure of atherosclerotic burden and fitness in a large population of generally healthy women. Methods 5341 women ages 40-90 years seen between 1997 and 2007 underwent maximal treadmill exercise testing and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning. Fitness was reported in METs estimated from maximal treadmill time, grade, and speed. CAC was characterized dichotomously as CAC=0 versus CAC>0, and CAC<100 versus CAC≥100. Multiple logistic regression models were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio of any CAC (CAC>0) and CAC≥100. Fitness was added to these models continuously and categorically based on standard and sample-specific cut-points. Results With a mean age of 52.0 years, the overall prevalence of detectable CAC was 19.9% and CAC≥100 was 6.8%. Univariable analysis showed a modest inverse relationship between fitness and CAC>0 (24% in low fit versus 19% in high fit, p-trend=0.006), with a similar trend observed for CAC≥100. In multivariable models, age adjustment diminished this association and the relationship was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for traditional risk factors. Conclusions The cardioprotective benefit of fitness does not appear to be mediated by an effect independent of traditional risk factors on the development of calcified coronary atherosclerosis as measured by electron beam tomography.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.01.016

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large data from other studies have reported a lack of association between reported physical activity, CAC, and adverse coronary events in exercising females, including endurance athletes.

    “Large data from other studies have also reported a lack of association between reported physical activity, CAC, and adverse coronary events in exercising females, including endurance athletes.6 35”

    From Resting and exercise-induced occult hypertension and coronary atherosclerosis in male masters endurance athletes (2026) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Discussion reports that, in a large sample of women, fitness was not associated with CAC after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. But the study measured treadmill-assessed fitness rather than reported physical activity, did not establish a finding for female endurance athletes, and explicitly states that it had no coronary outcomes data (Discussion). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeFina, L., Radford, N., Leonard, D., Gibbons, L., & Khera, A.
Affiliations
  • Cooper Institute (US)
  • Cooper Clinic (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
DeFina, Laura
Venue
Atherosclerosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
233
Issue
2
Pages
648-653
ISSN
0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099827305
Cited by
21
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atherosclerosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cooper Clinic
  • The Cooper Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, coronary artery calcification, women, coronary artery disease, treadmill exercise testing, METS, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, cardioprotection
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Artery Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Menopause, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Smoking, Texas, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Comorbidity, Dyslipidemias, Overweight, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review