Cited by 148Surgical Simulation and TrainingSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation-Based Training in Cardiac Surgery

Open access

Abstract

Background Operating room surgical training has significant limitations. This study hypothesized that some skills could be learned efficiently and safely by using simulation with component task training, deliberate practice, progressive complexity, and experienced coaching to produce safer cardiac surgeons.Methods Training modules included cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, massive air embolism, acute intraoperative aortic dissection, and sudden deterioration in cardiac function. Using deliberate practice, first-year cardiothoracic surgical residents at eight institutions were trained and evaluated on component tasks for each module and later on full cardiac operations. Evaluations were based on five-point Likert-scale tools indexed by module, session, task items, and repetitions. Statistical analyses relied on generalized linear model estimation and corresponding confidence intervals.Results The 27 residents who participated demonstrated improvement with practice repetitions resulting in excellent final scores per module (mean ± two SEs): cardiopulmonary bypass, 4.80 ± 0.12; coronary artery bypass grafting, 4.41 ± 0.19; aortic valve replacement, 4.51 ± 0.20; massive air embolism, 0.68 ± 0.14; acute intraoperative aortic dissection, 4.52 ± 0.17; and sudden deterioration in cardiac function, 4.76 ± 0.16. The transient detrimental effect of time away from training was also evident.Conclusions Overall performance in component tasks and complete cardiac surgical procedures improved during simulation-based training. Simulation-based training imparts skill sets for management of adverse events and can help produce safer surgeons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.062

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feins, R. H., Burkhart, H. M., Conte, J. V., Coore, D. N., Fann, J. I., Hicks, G. L., Nesbitt, J. C., Ramphal, P. S., Schiro, S. E., Shen, K. R., Sridhar, A., Stewart, P. W., Walker, J. D., & Mokadam, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of the West Indies (JM)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • University of the West Indies (TT)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Feins, Richard H.
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
312-321
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514530386
Cited by
148
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS020451)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001111)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
simulation-based training, cardiac surgery, surgical training, deliberate practice, cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, air embolism, adverse event management, skill retention, surgical safety
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Computer Simulation, Education, Medical, Graduate, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Internship and Residency, Thoracic Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review