Cited by 33Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactAir Quality and Health Impacts

Temporal patterns in daily measurements of inorganic and organic speciated PM2.5 in Denver

Open access
Dutton, Steven J., Rajagopalan, Balaji, Vedal, Sverre, Hannigan, Michael P.·2010·Atmospheric Environment

Abstract

Airborne particulate matter less than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 2.5) has been linked to a wide range of adverse health effects and as a result is currently regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. PM 2.5 originates from a multitude of sources and has heterogeneous physical and chemical characteristics. These features complicate the link between PM 2.5 emission sources, ambient concentrations and health effects. The goal of the Denver Aerosol Sources and Health (DASH) study is to investigate associations between sources and health using daily measurements of speciated PM 2.5 in Denver. The datxa set being collected for the DASH study will be the longest daily speciated PM 2.5 data set of its kind covering 5.5 years of daily inorganic and organic speciated measurements. As of 2008, 4.5 years of bulk measurements (mass, inorganic ions and total carbon) and 1.5 years of organic molecular marker measurements have been completed. Several techniques were used to reveal long-term and short-term temporal patterns in the bulk species and the organic molecular marker species. All species showed a strong annual periodicity, but their monthly and seasonal behavior varied substantially. Weekly periodicities appear in many compound classes with the most significant weekday/weekend effect observed for elemental carbon, cholestanes, hopanes, select polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy n-alkanoic acids and methoxyphenols. Many of the observed patterns can be explained by meteorology or anthropogenic activity patterns while others do not appear to have such obvious explanations. Similarities and differences in these findings compared to those reported from other cities are highlighted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.006

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The major components of PAHs in Seoul and Denver were similar, and average winter PAH levels were 16.1 ± 10.1 ng/m3 in Seoul and 3.1 ± 0.4 ng/m3 in Denver.

    “The major components of PAHs in Seoul and Denver were similar, and the average levels of PAHs during the winter season, according to the published data, are 16.1 ± 10.1ng/m3 and 3.1 ± 0.4 ng/m3 in Seoul and Denver, respectively (30–32).”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Methods (section 2.5) identify the PAHs measured in Denver, and the Results (section 3.2) describe their seasonal pattern, including a December maximum. The cited paper does not report the stated winter average of 3.1 ± 0.4 ng/m3 or compare Denver’s major PAH components with Seoul’s; it also does not support the Seoul figure. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Daniell PJ Discussion on symposium on autocorrelation in time series Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1946 8 88 90
  2. U.S. EPA 40 CFR Part 50, 1997 Edition: National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards. Code of Federal Regulations 1997 5 84 Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutton, S. J., Rajagopalan, B., Vedal, S., & Hannigan, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Hannigan, Michael P.
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
987-998
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038290739
Cited by
33
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES012197)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
PM2.5, inorganic ions, organic molecular markers, temporal patterns, seasonal variation, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, elemental carbon, cholestane, hopanes, methoxyphenols, n-alkanoic acids, meteorological factors, human activities, Denver

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review