Cited by 14Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Vertical profiles of black carbon and nanoparticles pollutants measured by a tethered balloon in Longyearbyen (Svalbard islands)

Open access
Cappelletti, David, Petroselli, Chiara, Mateos, David, Herreras, Marcos, Ferrero, Luca, Losi, Niccolò, Gregorič, Asta, Frangipani, Claudia +4 more·2022·Atmospheric Environment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119373

Cites

35 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upper-level transport of eBC was observed in profiling studies over Ny-Ålesund.

    “Upper-level transport of eBC was also observed in profiling studies performed over Ny-Ålesund (e.g., Cappelletti et al., 2022;Ferrero et al., 2016;Markowicz et al., 2017;Mazzola et al., 2016).”

    From In situ vertical observations of the layered structure of air pollution in a continental high-latitude urban boundary layer during winter (2025) · cites this paper as Cappelletti et al., 2022

    Section 3.5 (page unavailable) reports elevated eBC above 500 m in profiles over Longyearbyen and says the overall stratification resembled a situation previously observed over Ny-Ålesund. It describes the Ny-Ålesund observation specifically as a nanoparticle plume near the ground, not as upper-level eBC transport there. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cappelletti et al. (2022) reported mean eBC concentrations 110±10 ng m-3 below 500 m and 150±30 ng m-3 above 500 m.

    “Cappelletti et al. (2022) reported mean concentrations of 110 ± 10 and 150 ± 30 ng m -3 below and above 500 m, respectively.”

    From In situ vertical observations of the layered structure of air pollution in a continental high-latitude urban boundary layer during winter (2025) · cites this paper as Cappelletti et al. (2022)

    Section 3.5 (page unavailable) reports averaged vertical profiles with higher eBC above 500 m, supporting the claimed altitude pattern. Our copy does not state the attributed means of 110 ± 10 and 150 ± 30 ng m⁻³, so the numerical claim is not verified. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. A. D. A. HANSEN, H. ROSEN, and T. NOVAKOV, "The Aethalometer," Sci. Total Environ., vol. 36, pp. 191-196, 1984.
  2. L. Ferrero et al., "Vertical profiles of aerosol and black carbon in the Arctic: A seasonal phenomenology along 2 years (2011-2012) of field campaigns," Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 16, no. 19, 2016, doi: 10.5194/acp-16-12601-2016. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Y.-H. Cheng and M.-H. Lin, "Real-Time Performance of the microAeth® AE51 and the Effects of Aerosol Loading on Its Measurement Results at a Traffic Site," Aerosol Air Qual. Res., vol. 13, pp. 1853-1863, 2013, doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.12.0371. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappelletti, D., Petroselli, C., Mateos, D., Herreras, M., Ferrero, L., Losi, N., Gregorič, A., Frangipani, C., La Porta, G., Lonardi, M., Chernov, D. G., & Dekhtyareva, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Aerosol d.o.o. (Slovenia) (SI)
  • Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO)
Corresponding author
Cappelletti, David
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
290
Pages
119373
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295073661
Cited by
14
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
  • University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUNG (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Dipartimenti di Eccellenza (Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022, 2018–2022)
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (20182022, “Dipartimenti di Eccellenza - 2018-2022”)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (2018-2022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
black carbon, nanoparticles, Arctic aerosols, vertical profiles, tethered balloon, radiosonde, temperature inversion, Arctic pollution, Longyearbyen, aerosol optical depth, background aerosol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review