Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China

Su, Buda, Huang, Jinlong, Mondal, Sanjit Kumar, Zhai, Jianqing, Wang, Yanjun, Wen, Shanshan, Gao, Miaoni, Lv, Yanran, Jiang, Shan, Jiang, Tong, Li, Aiwei·2021·Atmospheric Research

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, future drought characteristics (frequency, duration and intensity) over China are analysed by using four climate models from CMIP6 under the seven SSP-RCP (shared socioeconomic pathway-representative concentration pathway) scenarios (SSP119, SSP126, SSP434, SSP245, SSP460, SSP370, and SSP585) for three defined periods of 2021–2040 (near-term), 2041–2060 (mid-term) and 2081–2100 (long-term). The corresponding four climate models output from CMIP5 are also used to conduct a comparison analysis between CMIP5 and CMIP6 to address the improvements added to CMIP6 in terms of drought identification. The drought characteristics are identified by applying the standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI) at a 12-month timescale and run theory. The results show that CMIP6 has a robust capability to capture historical (1986–2005) drought characteristics. For the future period of 2021–2040, the decrease in precipitation and increase in potential evapotranspiration will lead to continuous dry conditions in the upper and middle Yangtze River basin and eastern Pearl River basin. Relative to the reference period, drought events will be more frequent and severe with longer durations in the Northwest River basins and middle Yangtze River basin. Furthermore, higher emissions signify a greater increase in drought frequency and intensity in the long-term period. Except for the SSP585 scenario, the lower emission scenario corresponds to the higher drought duration soon and in the mid-21st century (2021–2060). This finding is regarded as a “strange phenomenon”, which cannot be detected by the previous CMIP5-based emission scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and the unlikely pathway RCP8.5). Therefore, additional “possible future”-based scenarios (SSP119, SSP126, SSP434, SSP245, SSP460, and SSP370) should be included in extreme climate studies, especially for the near future and mid-21st century. Notably, compared with CMIP5, the reduced biases in drought characteristics are more likely associated with improvements in the representation of physical processes in climate models from CMIP6. The results of this study could provide a basis for the development of drought adaptation measures over China.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105375

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gao, 2012, Uncertainties in monsoon precipitation projections over China: results from two high-resolution RCM simulations, Clim. Res., 52, 213, 10.3354/cr01084 · doi:10.3354/cr01084
  2. Laurie, 2020, How well do CMIP6 historical runs match observed Northeast US precipitation and extreme precipitation-related circulation, J. Clim., 33, 9835, 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1025.1 · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-1025.1
  3. Liang, 2017, Projection of drought hazards in China during twenty-first century, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 133, 331, 10.1007/s00704-017-2189-3 · doi:10.1007/s00704-017-2189-3
  4. Nature Climate Change, 2019, The CMIP6 landscape, Nat. Clim. Chang., 9
  5. Yin, 2009, Attribution analyses of potential evapotranspiration changes in China since the 1960s, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 101, 19, 10.1007/s00704-009-0197-7 · doi:10.1007/s00704-009-0197-7
  6. Zhai, 2010, Dryness/wetness variations in ten large river basins of China during the first 50 years of the 21st century, Quat. Int., 226, 101, 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.01.027 · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.01.027

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Su, B., Huang, J., Mondal, S. K., Zhai, J., Wang, Y., Wen, S., Gao, M., Lv, Y., Jiang, S., Jiang, T., & Li, A.
Venue
Atmospheric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
250
Pages
105375
ISSN
0169-8095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108729183
Cited by
419
References
79
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1510203, GZ 1486)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105375
The paper
Su, B., Huang, J., Mondal, S. K., Zhai, J., Wang, Y., Wen, S., Gao, M., Lv, Y., Jiang, S., Jiang, T., & Li, A. (2021). Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China. Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105375

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.