The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable material selection represents an important strategy in building design. Current building materials selection methods fail to provide adequate solutions for two major issues: assessment based on sustainability principles, and the process of prioritizing and assigning weights to relevant assessment criteria. This paper proposes a building material selection model based on the fuzzy extended analytical hierarchy process (FEAHP) techniques, with a view to providing solutions for these two issues. Assessment criteria are identified based on sustainable triple bottom line (TBL) approach and the need of building stakeholders. A questionnaire survey of building experts is conducted to assess the relative importance of the criteria and aggregate them into six independent assessment factors. The FEAHP is used to prioritize and assign important weightings for the identified criteria. A numerical example, illustrating the implementation of the model is given. The proposed model provides guidance to building designers in selecting sustainable building materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
SAATY, T. L., & KEARNS, K. P. (1985) · Analytical Planning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,357
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291575 · Cited by 14,898
Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP
Chang, D.-Y. (1996) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 · Cited by 4,874
The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications
Zahedi, F. (1986) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.16.4.96 · Cited by 1,329
Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach
Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004 · Cited by 1,246
Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery
Kibert, C. J. (2005) · Cited by 1,098
Saaty, T. L. (2008) · Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas · doi:10.1007/bf03191825 · Cited by 1,095
Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery
Berardi, U. (2013) · Intelligent Buildings International · doi:10.1080/17508975.2012.756388 · Cited by 904
On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications
Wang, Y., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050 · Cited by 765
Cited by
Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098 · Cited by 721
Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management
Silvius, G. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Akadiri, P. O., Olomolaiye, P. O., & Chinyio, E. A.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 113-125
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002748354
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004
- The paper
- Akadiri, P. O., Olomolaiye, P. O., & Chinyio, E. A. (2013). Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.