CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management

Silvius, Gilbert·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sustainability ambitions become operationalized through changes in processes, roles, and governance within everyday project contexts, and sustainability cannot be achieved without reconfiguring core project structures.

    “In doing so, the study advances theory on sustainability-oriented project management (e.g., Silvius, 2017) by showing how sustainability ambitions become operationalized through changes in processes, roles, and governance within everyday project contexts, and debunks the assumption that sustainability can be achieved without reconfiguring core project structures.”

    From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Silvius, 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Aarseth, 2017, Project sustainability strategies: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1071, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006 · DOI
  2. Adams, 2008, Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices, Account. Forum, 32, 288, 10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002 · DOI
  3. Akadiri, 2013, Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects, Autom. Constr., 30, 113, 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004 · DOI
  4. AlWaer, 2008, Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment, Archit. Sci. Rev., 51, 48, 10.3763/asre.2008.5107 · DOI
  5. Anbari, 1985, A systems approach to project evaluation, Proj. Manag. J., 16, 21
  6. Bal, 2013, Stakeholder engagement: achieving sustainability in the construction sector, Sustainability, 6, 695, 10.3390/su5020695 · DOI
  7. Barnes, 1983, How to allocate risks in construction contracts, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 1, 24, 10.1016/0263-7863(83)90034-0 · DOI
  8. Biedenbach, 2011, Paradigms in project management research: examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 4, 82, 10.1108/17538371111096908 · DOI
  9. Bredillet, 2007, Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research (Part 1), Proj. Manag. J., 38, 3, 10.1177/875697280703800201 · DOI
  10. Bredillet, 2007, Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research (Part 2), Proj. Manag. J., 38, 3, 10.1002/pmj.20001 · DOI
  11. Bredillet, 2007, Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research (Part 3), Proj. Manag. J., 38, 2, 10.1002/pmj.20025 · DOI
  12. Bredillet, 2008, Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research (Part 4), Proj. Manag. J., 39, 2, 10.1002/pmj.20030 · DOI
  13. Bredillet, 2008, Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research (Part 5), Proj. Manag. J., 39, 2, 10.1002/pmj.20051 · DOI
  14. Bredillet, 2008, Exploring research in project management: nine schools of project management research (Part 6), Proj. Manag. J., 39, 2, 10.1002/pmj.20073 · DOI
  15. Brent, 2007, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) during project execution phases: towards a stage-gate project management model for the raw materials processing industry of the energy sector, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 25, 111, 10.3152/146155107X205832 · DOI
  16. Briassoulis, 2001, Sustainable development and its indicators: through a (Planner's) glass darkly, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 44, 409, 10.1080/09640560120046142 · DOI
  17. Brones, 2014, Ecodesign in project management: a missing link for the integration of sustainability in product development?, J. Clean. Prod., 80, 106, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.088 · DOI
  18. Brones, 2015, From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model, J. Clean. Prod., 96, 44, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036 · DOI
  19. Carvalho, 2017, Can project sustainability management impact project success? An empirical study applying a contingent approach, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1120, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.018 · DOI
  20. Clifton, 2011, The stakeholder approach: a sustainability perspective, J. Bus. Ethics, 98, 121, 10.1007/s10551-010-0538-6 · DOI
  21. Cuppen, 2016, Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: revealing perspectives using Q methodology, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 34, 1347, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003 · DOI
  22. Edum-Fotwe, 2009, A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 27, 313, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.003 · DOI
  23. Eskerod, 2013, Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 6, 36, 10.1108/17538371311291017 · DOI
  24. Godfrey, 2009, The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis,, Strateg. Manag. J., 30, 425, 10.1002/smj.750 · DOI
  25. Huemann, 2017, Projects to create the future: managing projects meets sustainable development, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1066, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hugé, 2013, A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: interpreting sustainable development in practice,, Sustain. Sci., 8, 187, 10.1007/s11625-012-0184-2 · DOI
  27. Jarvis, 2003, A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research, J. Consumer Res., 30, 199, 10.1086/376806 · DOI
  28. Julian, 2008, Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures, Strat. Manag. J., 29, 963, 10.1002/smj.698 · DOI
  29. Keeble, 2003, Using indicators to measure sustainability performance at a corporate and project level, J. Bus. Ethics, 44, 149, 10.1023/A:1023343614973 · DOI
  30. Keeys, 2017, Project benefits Co-creation: shaping sustainable development benefits, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1196, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kivilä, 2017, Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1167, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Klakegg, 2009, Pursuing relevance and sustainability: improvement strategies for major public projects, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 2, 499, 10.1108/17538370910991115 · DOI
  33. Klakegg, 2011, Governance of major public investment projects: in pursuit of relevance and sustainability, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 4, 157, 10.1108/17538371111096953 · DOI
  34. Kolltveit, 2007, Perspectives on project management, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 25, 3, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.12.002 · DOI
  35. Labelle, 2013, Stakepartner management in projects, J. Mod. Proj. Manag., 1, 32
  36. Labuschagne, 2005, Sustainable Project Life Cycle Management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 23, 159, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.003 · DOI
  37. Labuschagne, 2006, Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 11, 3, 10.1065/lca2006.01.233 · DOI
  38. Labuschagne, 2008, An industry perspective of the completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in the manufacturing sector, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 253, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.028 · DOI
  39. Libaert, 1998, Faire accepter un projet: principes et méthodes, Commun. et Lang., 117, 76, 10.3406/colan.1998.2869 · DOI
  40. Linnenluecke, 2009, Subcultures and sustainability practices: the impact on understanding corporate sustainability, Bus. Strat. Environ., 18, 432, 10.1002/bse.609 · DOI
  41. Lundin, 1995, A theory of the temporary organization, Scand. J. Manag., 11, 437, 10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U · DOI
  42. Marcelino-Sádaba, 2015, Using Project Management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition, J. Clean. Prod., 99, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020 · DOI
  43. Martens, 2006, Sustainability: science or fiction?, Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, 2, 36
  44. Martens, 2016, The challenge of introducing sustainability into project management function: multiple-case studies, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 29, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.039 · DOI
  45. Martens, 2016, Sustainability and success variables in the project management context: an expert panel, Proj. Manag. J., 47, 24, 10.1177/875697281604700603 · DOI
  46. Martens, 2017, Key factors of sustainability in project management context: a survey exploring the project managers' perspective, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1084, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004 · DOI
  47. Molenaar, 2010, A synthesis of best-value procurement practices for sustainable design-build projects in the public sector, J. Green Build., 5, 148, 10.3992/jgb.5.4.148 · DOI
  48. Otegi-Olaso, 2015, Towards sustainable project management. A literature review
  49. Pade, 2008, An elaboration of critical success factors for rural ICT project sustainability in developing countries: exploring the dwesa case, J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl., 10
  50. Pollack, 2007, The changing paradigms of project management, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 25, 266, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.002 · DOI
  51. Robert, 2002, Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools, J. Clean. Prod., 10, 197, 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00061-0 · DOI
  52. Robinson, 2004, Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development, Ecol. Econ., 48, 369, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017 · DOI
  53. Schieg, 2009, The model of corporate social responsibility in project management, Bus. Theory Pract., 10, 315, 10.3846/1648-0627.2009.10.315-321 · DOI
  54. Silvius, 2015, Sustainability evaluation of IT/IS projects, Int. J. Green Comput., 6, 1, 10.4018/IJGC.2015070101 · DOI
  55. Silvius, 2016, Sustainability as a competence of project managers, PM World J., V, 1
  56. Silvius, 2017, Considering sustainability in project management decision making; an investigation using Q-methodology, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1133, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
  57. Silvius, 2014, Sustainability in Project Management: a literature review and impact analysis, Soc. Bus., 4, 10.1362/204440814X13948909253866 · DOI
  58. Silvius, 2015, Developing a maturity model for assessing sustainable project management, J. Mod. Proj. Manag., 3, 16
  59. Silvius, 2013, Sustainability in project management: reality bites, PM World J., II
  60. Söderlund, 2002, On the development of project management research: schools of thought and Critique, Proj. Manag., 8, 20
  61. Steurer, 2005, Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business–society relations, J. Bus. Ethics, 61, 263, 10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0 · DOI
  62. Talbot, 2011, Integration of sustainability principles into project baselines using a comprehensive indicator set, Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J., 10, 29
  63. Tranfield, 2003, Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review, Br. J. Manag., 14, 207, 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Turner, 2013, Perspectives on research in project management: the nine schools, Glob. Bus. Perspect., 1, 3, 10.1007/s40196-012-0001-4 · DOI
  65. Turner, 2003, On the nature of the project as a temporary organization, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21, 1, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0 · DOI
  66. van Marrewijk, 2003, Concept and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion, J. Bus. Eth., 44, 95, 10.1023/A:1023331212247 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Silvius, G.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
166
Pages
1479-1493
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121
Cited by
196
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review