The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In the recent years, building information modeling (BIM) has transformed the architecture, engineering, and construction industry, and attracted attentions from both researchers and practitioners. However, few studies have attempted to map the global research on BIM. This study conducts a scientometric review of global BIM research in 2005–2016, through co-author analysis, co-word analysis and co-citation analysis. A total of 614 bibliographic records from the Web of Science core collection database were analyzed. The results indicated that Charles M. Eastman received the most co-citations and that the most significant development in BIM research occurred primarily in the USA, South Korea and China. Additionally, BIM research has primarily focused on the subject categories of engineering, civil engineering and construction & building technology, and the keywords “visualization” and “industry foundation classes (IFC)” received citation bursts in the recent years. Furthermore, 10 co-citation clusters were identified, and the hot topics of BIM research were: mobile and cloud computing, laser scan, augmented reality, ontology, safety rule and code checking, semantic web technology, and automated generation. This study provides researchers and practitioners with an in-depth understanding of the status quo and trend of the BIM research in the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · Cited by 21,392
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Freeman, L. C. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033543 · Cited by 10,295
Chen, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20317 · Cited by 6,433
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21525 · Cited by 3,242
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P. M., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008) · Cited by 2,892
Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings — Literature review and future needs
Volk, R., Stengel, J., & Schultmann, F. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023 · Cited by 2,199
Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry
Azhar, S. (2011) · Leadership and Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)lm.1943-5630.0000127 · Cited by 2,192
International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.192822 · Cited by 1,831
Cited by
Integrating BIM and AI for Smart Construction Management: Current Status and Future Directions
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09830-8 · Cited by 441
Building information modelling for off-site construction: Review and future directions
Yin, X., Liu, H., Chen, Y., & Al-Hussein, M. (2019) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.010 · Cited by 420
A holistic review of off-site construction literature published between 2008 and 2018
Jin, R., Gao, S., Cheshmehzangi, A., & Aboagye-Nimo, E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.195 · Cited by 363
A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–2016
Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G., & Huang, C. (2019) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2018.1485548 · Cited by 339
Self-citationRecent advancements of robotics in construction
Xiao, B., Chen, C., & Yin, X. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104591 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 37-47
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2604936959
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002
- The paper
- Zhao, X. (2017). A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.