The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects
Abstract
Abstract Efficient collaboration among various stakeholders is important for the successful completion of a construction project. However, stakeholders in construction are fragmented, which in turn hinders accountable information sharing. To address this issue, the authors aim to develop and test an integrated digital twin and blockchain framework for traceable data communication. The digital twin updates building information modeling in near real-time using internet of things sensors, while the blockchain authenticates and adds confidence to all data transactions to the digital twin. The authors tested the framework with a case project where virtual positioning data from a prefabricated brick is transmitted to digital twin in near real-time, recorded on the blockchain with time stamps. The results show that the integrated digital twin and blockchain framework makes all data transactions traceable. This paper's primary contribution is the development of a framework that realizes accountable project-related information sharing across stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Wright, C. S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3440802 · Cited by 13,922
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System
Quigley, M. (2009) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · Cited by 8,729
Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 · Cited by 2,920
Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. '. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops · doi:10.1109/spw.2015.27 · Cited by 2,617
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818 · Cited by 2,404 · cited 1×
“The digital twin was first proposed in the product lifecycle management field [12] and studied in the aircraft and aerospace fields as a mirroring model for simulating an as-built vehicle, system, or process [13,14].”
BackgroundHawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.55 · Cited by 2,227
Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2017.7917634 · Cited by 1,843
Lu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, K. I.-K., Huang, H., & Xu, X. (2020) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837 · Cited by 1,624
Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research
Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179 · Cited by 1,324
Cited by
Blockchain for the metaverse: A Review
Huynh-The, T., Gadekallu, T. R., Wang, W., Yenduri, G., Ranaweera, P., Pham, Q.-V., da Costa, D. B., & Liyanage, M. (2023) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2023.02.008 · Cited by 771
Technologies for digital twin applications in construction
Tuhaise, V. V., Tah, J. H. M., & Abanda, F. H. (2023) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104931 · Cited by 308
A Survey on Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Things: Applications, Technologies and Tools
Xu, H., Wu, J., Pan, Q., Guan, X., & Guizani, M. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3297395 · Cited by 304
A Circular Built Environment in the Digital Age
(2024) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39675-5 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D., Lee, S. H., Masoud, N., Krishnan, M. S., & Li, V. C.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 103688
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3152733342
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 34.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103688
- The paper
- Lee, D., Lee, S. H., Masoud, N., Krishnan, M. S., & Li, V. C. (2021). Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103688
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
