Cited by 31Occupational Health and Safety ResearchBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Assessing exposure to slip, trip, and fall hazards based on abnormal gait patterns predicted from confidence interval estimation

Lee, Hoonyong, Lee, Gaang, Lee, SangHyun, Ahn, Changbum R.·2022·Automation in Construction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104253

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Lee, G., Lee, S., & Ahn, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Changbum R.
Venue
Automation in Construction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
139
Pages
104253
ISSN
0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224254305
Cited by
31
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Automation in Construction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
occupational exposure assessment, abnormal gait detection, inertial measurement unit, Mahalanobis distance, bidirectional LSTM, confidence interval estimation, construction workers, fall prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review