Cited by 42Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsOccupational Health and PerformanceErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological impact of powered back-support exoskeletons in construction: Analyzing muscle fatigue, metabolic cost, ergonomic risks, and stability

Open access
Ojha, Amit, Gautam, Yogesh, Jebelli, Houtan, Akanmu, Abiola·2024·Automation in Construction

Abstract

Powered back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) are emerging as ergonomic interventions in construction to reduce musculoskeletal injuries by actively enhancing user strength . However, their adoption remains slow due to limited understanding of potential physiological impacts, including muscle fatigue, metabolic cost, joint hyperextension , and fall risk. This paper empirically investigates the potential physiological risk associated with the powered BSEs during construction tasks. A user-centered experiment assessed the impact of powered BSEs on muscle fatigue, metabolic cost, ergonomic posture, and stability during common construction activities. The results indicated that the powered BSEs significantly decreased muscle activity for back and abdominal muscle groups by an average of 60 %, reduced metabolic costs by 17 %, and lowered ergonomic risks by 50 % without impacting stability. This study contributes to the understanding of the physiological impacts of powered BSEs in construction, providing empirical evidence of their effectiveness in reducing muscle fatigue, metabolic costs, and enhancing ergonomic safety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105742

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Kim, 2019, 7, 185
  2. Breneman, 2023, 2024, 763
  3. Del Ferraro, 2020, The effects of upper-body exoskeletons on human metabolic cost and thermal response during work tasks—a systematic review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 7374, 10.3390/ijerph17207374 · DOI
  4. Gonzalez, 2022, Assessment of a powered ankle exoskeleton on human stability and balance, Appl. Ergon., 103, 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103768 · DOI
  5. Passmore, 2019, Severity of U.S. Construction Worker Injuries, 2015–2017, vol. 97
  6. Alemi, 2020, Effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons on muscle activity, energy expenditure, and subjective assessments during repetitive lifting, human factors, J. Human Factors Ergon. Soc., 62, 458, 10.1177/0018720819897669 · DOI
  7. Rayssiguie, 2022, vol. 22
  8. Park, 2022, Effects of back-support exoskeleton use on gait performance and stability during level walking, Gait Posture, 92, 181, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.028 · DOI
  9. He, 2017, vol. 10, 89
  10. Gonzalez, 2022, Assessment of a powered ankle exoskeleton on human stability and balance, Appl. Ergon., 103, 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103768 · DOI
  11. Park, 2021, Effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons on postural balance during quiet stance and functional limits of stability, J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 57, 10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102516 · DOI
  12. Antwi-Afari, 2017, Biomechanical analysis of risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders during repetitive lifting task in construction workers, Autom. Constr., 83, 41, 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.007 · DOI
  13. Walter, 2023, Active exoskeleton reduces erector spinae muscle activity during lifting, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11, 1143926, 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143926 · DOI
  14. Brockway, 1987, Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man, human nutrition, Clin. Nutr., 41, 463
  15. Liu, 2023, 2024, 331

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Ojha, A., Gautam, Y., Jebelli, H., & Akanmu, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Jebelli, Houtan
Venue
Automation in Construction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
168
Pages
105742
ISSN
0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402478459
Cited by
39
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Automation in Construction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS-2410255, IIS-2221166)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
construction workers, muscle fatigue, metabolic cost, musculoskeletal injury prevention, ergonomic posture, stability, fall risk, back muscle activity, abdominal muscle activity, wearable robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review