Cited by 20Face Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and SynchronizationHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

An amplification of feedback from facial muscles strengthened sympathetic activations to emotional facial cues

Lee, In-Seon, Yoon, Sung-Soo, Lee, Soon-Ho, Lee, Hyejung, Park, Hi-Joon, Wallraven, Christian, Chae, Younbyoung·2013·Autonomic Neuroscience

Abstract

The facial feedback hypothesis suggests that feedback from cutaneous and muscular afferents influences our emotions during the control of facial expressions. Enhancing facial expressiveness produces an increase in autonomic arousal and self-reported emotional experience, whereas limiting facial expression attenuates these responses. The present study investigated differences in autonomic responses during imitated versus observed facial expressions. Thus, we obtained the facial electromyogram (EMG) of the corrugator muscle, and measured the skin conductance response (SCR) and pupil size (PS) of participants while they were either imitating or simply observing emotional expressions of anger. We found that participants produced significantly greater responses across all three measures (EMG, SCR, and PS) during active imitation than during passive observation. These results show that amplified feedback from facial muscles during imitation strengthens sympathetic activation in response to negative emotional cues. Our findings suggest that manipulations of muscular feedback could be used to modulate the bodily expression of emotion, including autonomic responses to the emotional cues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autneu.2013.06.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manipulations of muscular feedback from facial expression can modulate emotional states, including autonomic responses to emotional cues.

    “manipulations of muscular feedback from facial expression can modulate the emotional states, including autonomic responses to the emotional cues [32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, I.-S., Yoon, S.-S., Lee, S.-H., Lee, H., Park, H.-J., Wallraven, C., & Chae, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Chae, Younbyoung
Venue
Autonomic Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
179
Issue
1-2
Pages
37-42
ISSN
1566-0702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093082710
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autonomic Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (R11-2005-0049404)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
facial feedback hypothesis, facial expression imitation, anger, sympathetic activation, skin conductance response, pupil size, corrugator supercilii, autonomic arousal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cues, Electromyography, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Feedback, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Skin, Sympathetic Nervous System, Muscle, Skeletal, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review