Cited by 112Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Human amygdala sensitivity to the pupil size of others

Open access
Demos, K.E., Kelley, W.M., Ryan, S.L., Davis, F.C., Whalen, P.J.·2008·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Stimulation of the amygdala produces pupil dilation in animal and human subjects. The present study examined whether the amygdala is sensitive to variations in the pupil size of others. Male subjects underwent event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while passively viewing unfamiliar female faces whose pupils were either unaltered (natural variations in large and small pupils) or altered to be larger or smaller than their original size. Results revealed that the right amygdala and left amygdala/substantia innominata were sensitive to the pupil size of others, exhibiting increased activity for faces with relatively large pupils. Upon debrief, no subject reported being aware that the pupils had been manipulated. These results suggest a function for the amygdala in the detection of changes in pupil size, an index of arousal and/or interest on the part of a conspecific, even in the absence of explicit knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhn034

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with large pupils are commonly rated as more attractive and activate neural responses in the amygdala.

    “For example, people with large pupils are commonly rated as more attractive and activate neural responses in the amygdala [35,36], and a recent study demonstrates that human participants evaluate those with dilating pupils as more friendly, attractive and trustworthy and behave more cooperatively with them in the trust game [37].”

    From Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Discussion reports greater amygdala activity for faces with big versus small pupils. But the Results (Effect of Attractiveness) found no significant difference in attractiveness ratings between those faces, so this paper does not support the attractiveness part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Humans have a cognitive tendency to perceive emotional arousal based on iris-pupil contrast and make inferences about a person's personality.

    “humans have a cognitive tendency to perceive emotional arousal based on iris–pupil contrast and make inferences about a person's personality [33–37].”

    From Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Discussion describes pupil dilation as an indicator of another person's arousal, and the Conclusion reports greater amygdala activity for big-pupil faces. But the Conclusion also says explicit arousal ratings did not differ between big- and small-pupil faces; the paper does not establish perception of arousal based on iris–pupil contrast or inferences about personality. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Seeing others' dilated pupils causes significantly higher amygdala activation than viewing undilated pupils, an effect that appears unrelated to subjective reports of attractiveness.

    “Seeing others' dilated pupils also causes significantly higher amygdala activation than viewing undilated pupils, an effect that nonetheless appears to be unrelated to subjective reports of attractiveness (Demos et al., 2008;Amemiya and Ohtomo, 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demos, K. E., Kelley, W. M., Ryan, S. L., Davis, F. C., & Whalen, P. J.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Demos, K.E.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2008-03-27
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
2729-2734
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2119582005
Cited by
112
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dartmouth College
  • U.S. Public Health Service (080716, 069315)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080716, 080716, 069315)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
amygdala, pupil size, social perception, facial expressions, arousal detection, substantia innominata, face perception, unconscious processes, pupillometry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Arousal, Cues, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Pupil, Visual Acuity, Visual Perception, Knowledge, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review