Cited by 24Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsExtremum Seeking Control SystemsAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

Nonconvex distributed feedback optimization for aggregative cooperative robotics

Open access
Carnevale, Guido, Mimmo, Nicola, Notarstefano, Giuseppe·2024·Automatica

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111767

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decentralized and swarm-based systems manage larger scales with moderate to high overhead.

    “Table 7 compares these architectures, showing decentralized and swarm-based systems managing larger scales with moderate to high overhead [44,51].”

    From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction (page not available) describes a fully distributed method for a network of agents, and the Problem Formulation section specifies continuous inter-agent communication. But the paper’s simulation uses six agents; our copy does not establish that decentralized or swarm-based systems manage larger scales, or classify their overhead as moderate to high. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Scalability is limited by coordination overhead in large fleets, with distributed optimization reducing latency in swarms, yet efficiency drops remain a concern.

    “Scalability is limited by coordination overhead in large fleets, with distributed optimization reducing latency in swarms [51], yet efficiency drops remain a concern [4].”

    From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Abstract describes a distributed optimization law for cooperating robots, and Section V applies it to a six-robot surveillance network. Our copy does not report reduced latency in swarms or establish that coordination overhead limits scalability in large fleets. The efficiency concern is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. P. D. Grontas, M. W. Fisher, and F. Dörfler, "Distributed and constrained h 2 control design via system level synthesis and dual consensus admm," in 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 301-307, IEEE, 2022.
  2. S. Sastry, Nonlinear systems: analysis, stability, and control, vol. 10. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carnevale, G., Mimmo, N., & Notarstefano, G.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Carnevale, Guido
Venue
Automatica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
167
Pages
111767
ISSN
0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399480452
Cited by
23
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Automatica (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Governo Italiano Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (BR22GR01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Extremum Seeking Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
non-convex optimization, cooperative robotics, multi-robot systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review