Cited by 50Stuttering Research and TreatmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology Research

Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter

Open access
Daliri, Ayoub, Max, Ludo·2015·Brain and Language

Abstract

We previously found that stuttering individuals do not show the typical auditory modulation observed during speech planning in nonstuttering individuals. In this follow-up study, we further elucidate this difference by investigating whether stuttering speakers' atypical auditory modulation is observed only when sensory predictions are based on movement planning or also when predictable auditory input is not a consequence of one's own actions. We recorded 10 stuttering and 10 nonstuttering adults' auditory evoked potentials in response to random probe tones delivered while anticipating either speaking aloud or hearing one's own speech played back and in a control condition without auditory input (besides probe tones). N1 amplitude of nonstuttering speakers was reduced prior to both speaking and hearing versus the control condition. Stuttering speakers, however, showed no N1 amplitude reduction in either the speaking or hearing condition as compared with control. Thus, findings suggest that stuttering speakers have general auditory prediction difficulties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.008

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Luck SJ An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2014 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA 2nd ed.
  2. Max L Daniels J Curet K Cronin K Modulation of auditory and somatosensory processing during the planning of speech movements 41 44 Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production Strasbourg, France 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daliri, A., & Max, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Haskins Laboratories (US)
Corresponding author
Max, Ludo
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
150
Pages
37-44
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1215954078
Cited by
50
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (MOP-137001)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-137001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
stuttering, auditory prediction, auditory evoked potentials, N1 component, speech preparation, motor planning
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Auditory Perception, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hearing, Humans, Male, Movement, Speech, Stuttering, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review