L1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies investigating bilingual processes have produced controversial results in determining similarities versus differences between L1 and L2 neural networks. The current meta-analytic study was conducted to examine what factors play a role in the similarities and differences between L1 and L2 networks with a focus on age of acquisition (AOA) and whether the orthographic transparency of L2 is more or less transparent than that of L1. Using activation likelihood estimation (ALE), we found L2 processing involved more additional regions than L1 for late bilinguals in comparison to early bilinguals, suggesting L2 processing is more demanding in late bilinguals. We also provide direct evidence that AOA of L2 influences L1 processing through the findings that early bilinguals had greater activation in the left fusiform gyrus than late bilinguals during L1 processing even when L1 languages were the same in the two groups, presumably due to greater co-activation of orthography in L1 and L2 in early bilinguals. In addition, we found that the same L2 languages evoked different brain activation patterns depending on whether it was more or less transparent than L1 in orthographic transparency. The bilateral auditory cortex and right precentral gyrus were more involved in shallower-than-L1 L2s, suggesting a "sound-out" strategy for a more regular language by involving the phonological regions and sensorimotor regions to a greater degree. In contrast, the left frontal cortex…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several reviewed studies converge on the finding that early bilinguals, relative to late bilinguals with the same L1, showed greater activation in the left fusiform gyrus than late bilinguals when processing the L1.
“Introducing the AoA factor, several reviewed studies converge on the finding that early bilinguals, relative to late bilinguals – with both sampled populations having the same L1 – showed greater activation in the left fusiform gyrus than late bilinguals when processing the L1.”
From Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism (2018) · cites this paper as Liu and Cao (2016)
Liu and Cao (2016) cite studies of L1 permeability in bilingualism which reveal different patterns of neural activation in the L1 after vs. before acquisition of the L2.
“In their meta-analysis, Liu and Cao (2016) cite studies of L1 permeability in bilingualism, which reveal different patterns of neural activation in the L1 after vs. before acquisition of the L2.”
From Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism (2018) · cites this paper as Liu and Cao (2016)
Cites
Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system
GREEN, D. W. (1998) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728998000133 · Cited by 2,807 · see citing works
Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & collaboration with COST Action A8 network (2003) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712603321661859 · Cited by 2,601 · see citing works
The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009
Price, C. J. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05444.x · Cited by 1,387 · see citing works
Language selection in bilingual speech: evidence for inhibitory processes
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T. (2008) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.001 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Eickhoff, S. B., Bzdok, D., Laird, A. R., Roski, C., Caspers, S., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.021 · Cited by 484 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, Set A: 13 early bilingual studies, 27 late bilingual studies) can be corrected by this approach (Eickhoff et al., 2011): Simulated data is created by pooling the foci data sets and randomly dividing them into two groups of the same size as the original data sets (e.”
The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis
Ackermann, H., & Riecker, A. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00347-x · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Learning to Read Across Languages
(2008) · doi:10.4324/9780203935668 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Guo, T., Liu, H., Misra, M., & Kroll, J. F. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.049 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationWagner, S., Sebastian, A., Lieb, K., Tüscher, O., & Tadić, A. (2014) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-15-19 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Language switching in the bilingual brain: what's next?
Hernandez, A. E. (2009) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.005 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Neural bases of language switching in high and early proficient bilinguals
Garbin, G., Costa, A., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Ventura, N., Belloch, V., Hernandez, M., & Ávila, C. (2011) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.011 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
The role of age of acquisition on past tense generation in Spanish–English bilinguals: An fMRI study
Waldron, E. J., & Hernandez, A. E. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.002 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism
Birdsong, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“In their meta-analysis, Liu and Cao (2016) cite studies of L1 permeability in bilingualism, which reveal different patterns of neural activation in the L1 after vs. before acquisition of the L2.”
Background
- Authors
- Liu, H., & Cao, F.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cao, Fan
- Venue
- Brain and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 60-73
- ISSN
- 0093-934X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2409706514
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- bilingualism, age of acquisition, orthographic transparency, late bilinguals, early bilinguals, phonological processing, activation likelihood estimation
- MeSH terms
- Auditory Cortex, Brain, Brain Mapping, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Temporal Lobe, Likelihood Functions, Multilingualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review