The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures
Open accessAbstract
The structures of protein antigen–antibody (Ag–Ab) interfaces contain information about how Ab recognize Ag as well as how Ag are folded to present surfaces for Ag recognition. As such, the Ab surface holds information about Ag folding that resides with the Ab–Ag interface residues and how they interact. In order to gain insight into the nature of such interactions, a data set comprised of 53 non-redundant 3D structures of Ag–Ab complexes was analyzed. We assessed the physical and biochemical features of the Ag–Ab interfaces and the degree to which favored interactions exist between amino acid residues on the corresponding interface surfaces. Amino acid compositional analysis of the interfaces confirmed the dominance of TYR in the Ab paratope-containing surface (PCS), with almost two fold greater abundance than any other residue. Additionally TYR had a much higher than expected presence in the PCS compared to the surface of the whole antibody (defined as the occurrence propensity), along with aromatics PHE, TRP, and to a lesser degree HIS and ILE. In the Ag epitope-containing surface (ECS), there were slightly increased occurrence propensities of TRP and TYR relative to the whole Ag surface, implying an increased significance over the compositionally most abundant LYS>ASN>GLU>ASP>ARG. This examination encompasses a large, diverse set of unique Ag–Ab crystal structures that help explain the biological range and specificity of Ag–Ab interactions. This analysis may also provide a measure of the significance of individual amino acid residues in phage display analysis of Ag binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988
Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges
DeLano, W. L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00283-x · Cited by 767
Birtalan, S., Zhang, Y., Fellouse, F. A., Shao, L., Schaefer, G., & Sidhu, S. S. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.093 · Cited by 244 · cited 1×
“5 fold more contacts) are again among the residues that are found in protein interface hotspots [32] and are identified by Sidhu and colleagues as among the most important for affinity in Ag–Ab interactions [52].”
BackgroundGreenbaum, J. A., Andersen, P. H., Blythe, M., Bui, H., Cachau, R. E., Crowe, J., Davies, M., Kolaskar, A. S., Lund, O., Morrison, S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.815 · Cited by 244
Self-citationStructural waters define a functional channel mediating activation of the GPCR, rhodopsin
Angel, T. E., Gupta, S., Jastrzebska, B., Palczewski, K., & Chance, M. R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901074106 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Cited by
Rohloff, J. C., Gelinas, A. D., Jarvis, T. C., Ochsner, U. A., Schneider, D. J., Gold, L., & Janjic, N. (2014) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2014.49 · Cited by 533
Nucleic acid aptamers in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy
Ma, H., Liu, J., Ali, M. M., Mahmood, M. A. I., Labanieh, L., Lu, M., Iqbal, S. M., Zhang, Q., Zhao, W., & Wan, Y. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00357h · Cited by 265
Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data
Mitchell, L. S., & Colwell, L. J. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25497 · Cited by 233
AB ‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions
Sirin, S., Apgar, J. R., Bennett, E. M., & Keating, A. E. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2829 · Cited by 179
Stability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles measured with an aptamer-based platform
Kim, C. H., Tworoger, S. S., Stampfer, M. J., Dillon, S. T., Gu, X., Sawyer, S. J., Chan, A. T., Libermann, T. A., & Eliassen, A. H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26640-w · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramaraj, T., Angel, T., Dratz, E. A., Jesaitis, A. J., & Mumey, B.
- Venue
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 1824
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 520-532
- ISSN
- 1570-9639 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072854137
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.12.007
- The paper
- Ramaraj, T., Angel, T., Dratz, E. A., Jesaitis, A. J., & Mumey, B. (2012). Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.12.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.