Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures

Open access
Ramaraj, Thiruvarangan, Angel, Thomas, Dratz, Edward A., Jesaitis, Algirdas J., Mumey, Brendan·2012·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

Abstract

The structures of protein antigen–antibody (Ag–Ab) interfaces contain information about how Ab recognize Ag as well as how Ag are folded to present surfaces for Ag recognition. As such, the Ab surface holds information about Ag folding that resides with the Ab–Ag interface residues and how they interact. In order to gain insight into the nature of such interactions, a data set comprised of 53 non-redundant 3D structures of Ag–Ab complexes was analyzed. We assessed the physical and biochemical features of the Ag–Ab interfaces and the degree to which favored interactions exist between amino acid residues on the corresponding interface surfaces. Amino acid compositional analysis of the interfaces confirmed the dominance of TYR in the Ab paratope-containing surface (PCS), with almost two fold greater abundance than any other residue. Additionally TYR had a much higher than expected presence in the PCS compared to the surface of the whole antibody (defined as the occurrence propensity), along with aromatics PHE, TRP, and to a lesser degree HIS and ILE. In the Ag epitope-containing surface (ECS), there were slightly increased occurrence propensities of TRP and TYR relative to the whole Ag surface, implying an increased significance over the compositionally most abundant LYS>ASN>GLU>ASP>ARG. This examination encompasses a large, diverse set of unique Ag–Ab crystal structures that help explain the biological range and specificity of Ag–Ab interactions. This analysis may also provide a measure of the significance of individual amino acid residues in phage display analysis of Ag binding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.12.007

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Ramaraj, T., Angel, T., Dratz, E. A., Jesaitis, A. J., & Mumey, B.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
1824
Issue
3
Pages
520-532
ISSN
1570-9639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072854137
Cited by
182
References
6
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.12.007
The paper
Ramaraj, T., Angel, T., Dratz, E. A., Jesaitis, A. J., & Mumey, B. (2012). Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.12.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.