Cited by 13Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

Apolipoprotein E4 exhibits intermediates with domain interaction

Dolai, Subhrajyoti, Cherakara, Sreelakshmi, Garai, Kanchan·2020·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

Abstract

ApoE4(C112R) is the strongest risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, while apoE3(C112) is considered normal. The C112R substitution is believed to alter the interactions between the N-terminal (NTD) and the C-terminal domain (CTD) leading to major functional differences. Here we investigate how the molecular property of the residue at position 112 affects domain interaction using an array of C112X substitutions with arginine, alanine, threonine, valine, leucine and isoleucine as 'X'. We attempt to determine the free energy of domain interaction (∆G INT) from stabilities of the NTD (∆G NTD) and CTD (∆G CTD) in the full-length apoE, and the stabilities of fragments of the NTD (∆G NTF) and CTD (∆G CTF), using the relationship, ∆G INT = ∆G NTD + ∆G CTD - ∆G NTF - ∆G CTF. We find that although ∆G NTD is strongly dependent on the C112X substitutions, ∆G NTD - ∆G NTF is small. Furthermore, ∆G CTD remains nearly the same as ∆G CTF. Therefore, ∆G INT is estimated to be small and similar for the apoE isoforms. However, stability of domain interaction monitored by urea dependent changes in interdomain Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is found to be strongly dependent on C112X substitutions. ApoE4 exhibits the highest mid-point of denaturation of interdomain FRET. To resolve the apparently contradictory observations, we hypothesize that higher interdomain FRET in apoE4 in urea may involve 'intermediate' states. Enhanced fluorescence of bis-ANS and susceptibility to proteolytic cleavage support that apoE4, specifically, the NTD of apoE4 harbor 'intermediates' in both native and mildly denaturing conditions. The intermediates could hold key to the pathological functions of apoE4.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140535

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dolai, S., Cherakara, S., & Garai, K.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Garai, Kanchan
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
1868
Issue
12
Pages
140535
ISSN
1570-9639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082513061
Cited by
13
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
  • Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
APOE ε4, apolipoprotein E isoforms, N-terminal domain, C-terminal domain, domain interactions, free energy of interaction, protein stability, urea denaturation, protein intermediates, Alzheimer's disease risk, proteolytic cleavage
MeSH terms
Humans, Kinetics, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Binding, Structure-Activity Relationship, Protein Isoforms, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Protein Stability, Protein Unfolding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review