PreprintCited by 0Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHeat shock proteins researchProtein purification and stability

Utilizing a cell culture based novel cellular thermal shift assay to understand the isoform-dependent thermal stability of ApoE variants

Open access
Jackson, Rosemary J., Dierksmeier, Steven, Nishtar, Maryam, Meltzer, Jonah, Balduin, Frieda, Beaumont, Bobby, Fan, Zhanyun, Sergienko, Eduard +3 more·2026·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) is the primary genetic risk modifier of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, with the ε4 allele increasing risk up to 15-fold relative to ε3. The structural differences between isoforms are thought to underlie their distinct effects on lipid transport, receptor binding, and disease risk. ApoE4 exhibits reduced thermodynamic stability compared to ApoE3, but prior characterisation has relied on purified recombinant protein, leaving open whether these differences are preserved in native cellular environments and how they relate to rare disease-associated variants. Here, we employed the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and a bioluminescence-based thermal stability assay (BiTSA) to systematically characterise ApoE thermal stability across isoforms and variants. Using CETSA on brain tissue from humanised APOE knock-in mice and post-mortem human brain, we confirm that ApoE4 exhibits significantly reduced thermal stability compared to ApoE3 in native tissue, with this difference conserved across species despite variation in absolute melting temperatures. We developed BiTSA, which leverages a split-luciferase HiBiT tag to quantify soluble ApoE across a thermal gradient in living cells, providing a higher-throughput platform that faithfully recapitulates isoform stability differences. Applying BiTSA to rare AD-associated variants, we found that L28P exerts divergent, isoform-dependent effects, destabilising ApoE3 while paradoxically stabilising ApoE4—a finding supported by AlphaFold modelling revealing isoform-specific differences in helix 1 architecture. These results establish BiTSA as a robust cellular tool for ApoE variant characterisation and demonstrate that isoform background critically modulates the structural consequences of rare mutations.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This preprint uses CETSA in mouse and human brain tissue and a new HiBiT-based BiTSA in cells to show that ApoE4 is less thermally stable than ApoE3 in native contexts. It further finds that rare ApoE variants can have isoform-dependent effects, most notably L28P destabilizing ApoE3 but paradoxically stabilizing ApoE4.

Key findings

  • ApoE4 showed significantly lower thermal stability than ApoE3 in humanized APOE knock-in mouse brain and in post-mortem human APOE3/3 vs APOE4/4 brain; human brain CETSA gave t=2.071, df=7, p=0.0386, and mouse CETSA gave F(2,12)=13.70 with Tukey ApoE3-to-ApoE4 p=0.0159.
  • Cross-species CETSA showed endogenous mouse ApoE melted comparably to human ApoE3 and monkey ApoE comparably to ApoE2, with F(6,23)=7.453 and Tukey ApoE4-to-monkey p=0.0045.
  • BiTSA in HEK293 cells recapitulated the isoform difference: ApoE4 had lower Tm than ApoE3, F(4,24)=125.3, Tukey ApoE3-to-ApoE4 p<0.0001, with an ApoE3–ApoE4 delta of ~2–3°C; the difference was maintained in astrocytes.
  • Rare-variant testing found ApoE3-Jacksonville slightly destabilized ApoE3 (Dunnett p=0.0446), ApoE4-R251G slightly stabilized ApoE4 (p=0.0003), and L28P destabilized ApoE3 (p<0.0001) while paradoxically stabilizing ApoE4 (p<0.0001); AlphaFold models showed helix 1 kinking in ApoE3-L28P but largely restored helical structure in ApoE4-L28P in four of five models.

Methods

  • CETSA was performed on brain tissue from humanized APOE knock-in mice expressing human APOE2, APOE3, or APOE4, plus post-mortem human APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 brain, with heating across a thermal gradient and immunoblot quantification of soluble ApoE.
  • BiTSA expressed ApoE variants as N-terminal HiBiT fusion proteins in HEK293 cells and astrocytes; after thermal gradient heating and lysis with LgBiT, luminescence quantified soluble ApoE, with 16 thermal points in technical quadruplet.
  • Data were normalized to lowest temperature as 100% and highest as 0%, fit with a sigmoidal Boltzmann curve to record V50 and slope; statistics used Shapiro-Wilk, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s or Tukey’s post-hoc tests, and Student’s t-test for human brain V50s. AlphaFold was used for structural modeling.

Limitations

  • The paper states that CETSA and BiTSA measure aggregation/insolubility rather than intrinsic thermodynamic stability alone, and results can be influenced by protein concentration, aggregation propensity, and interactions with cellular or media components; ApoE’s tendency to self-associate and oligomerize complicates interpretation.
  • The paper states that absence of a thermal stability difference cannot be taken as evidence that a protein is conformationally unperturbed, and that variants without melting-temperature effects may still affect lipid binding, receptor interactions, or other functions; future functional assays are needed.
  • The paper notes that L28P results contrast with prior purified recombinant protein studies, possibly due to cellular lipids, post-translational modifications, or oligomeric state; it also states CETSA is low-throughput and requires substantial biological material. Evident from the text: absolute melting temperatures differed across contexts, and the work is a preprint not certified by peer review.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64898/2026.06.09.730809

Cites

69 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

31 of 41 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The arginine at position 112 in ApoE4 is predicted to promote an interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains (domain interaction) that is absent in ApoE3 and ApoE2.

    “The arginine at position 112 in ApoE4 is predicted to promote an interaction between the N-and C-terminal domains (domain interaction) that is absent in ApoE3 and ApoE2 23,26,27 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [26] source
    • cites [27] 2020, Apolipoprotein E4 exhibits intermediates with domain interaction, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics source
  • Premisecitation

    APOE4-R251G decreases the risk of ApoE4 to be similar to that of ApoE3.

    “ApoE4-R251G has been shown to decrease the risk of ApoE4 to be similar to that of ApoE3 37,38”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [37] 2022, Association of Rare APOE Missense Variants V236E and R251G With Risk of Alzheimer Disease, JAMA Neurol source

      The Discussion reports that R251G mitigates the Alzheimer disease risk associated with APOE ε4. But it says the resulting risk estimate is similar to APOE ε2, specifically ε2/ε3—not ε3 as the citing sentence states. The Results likewise compare the ε3/ε4 (R251G) group with ε2/ε3. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [38] source

      The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says R251G has been associated with reduced Alzheimer disease risk. It does not say the reduction occurs specifically on an ApoE4 background or brings risk to the level of ApoE3; the paper’s reported analysis concerns R145C instead. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    APOE3-R145C is associated with increased risk of AD compared with ApoE3.

    “APOE3-R145C has been shown to increase the risk of AD 38 .”
    • Also stated in: § Testing the thermal stability of rare disease-associated ApoE variants · plain
      “ApoE3-R145C has been associated with increased risk when compared with ApoE3”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] source

      The Results and Discussion report increased Alzheimer disease risk associated with APOE3-R145C in African-ancestry individuals with the ε3/ε4 genotype. The citing sentence omits that restriction: the paper reports no significant increase among ε3/ε3 carriers, so it does not support a general increase in risk compared with ApoE3. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationown data

    The region around R25C is structurally similar between ApoE3 and ApoE4.

    “The parallel effect of R25C 51 across isoforms suggests that this region is structurally similar between ApoE3 and ApoE4”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] source

      The Abstract reports structural effects of R25C in apoE3, and the Fig. 1 caption maps residue 25 on an apoE3 structure. Neither passage compares the region around R25C in apoE3 and apoE4; a search for parallel effects across isoforms found no such comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    ApoE3-Jacksonville caused a significant reduction in the width of the slope.

    “This corresponded to a similarly significant reduction in the width of the slope, which could be due to the reduced propensity of ApoE3-Jacksonville to dimerize or oligomerize 36 (Figure 3E)[ F (5, 35) = 7.419 (Dunnets ApoE3 vs ApoE3_Jacksonville p=0.0142,ApoE3 vs ApoE4 p=0.0056).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    APOE3-Christchurch and APOE3-Jacksonville are protective compared with ApoE3.

    “ApoE3-Christchurch and ApoE3-Jacksonville have both been shown to be protective when compared with ApoE3 [35][36][37]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] source

      The paper’s Abstract describes an APOE3-Christchurch homozygote resistant to clinical onset of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s dementia and reports lower Aβ42 aggregation with ApoE3-Christchurch than with ApoE3. It does not address APOE3-Jacksonville (searched: Jacksonville), so it supports only the Christchurch part of the claim. The Christchurch finding is also based on a case report and in-vitro comparisons, rather than a general demonstration of protection. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [36] source
    • cites [37] 2022, Association of Rare APOE Missense Variants V236E and R251G With Risk of Alzheimer Disease, JAMA Neurol source

      The Results (page unavailable) compare V236E, the APOE3-Jacksonville variant, with ε3/ε3 noncarriers and find lower Alzheimer disease risk. The Abstract (page unavailable) says APOE3-Christchurch was only posited to be protective in PSEN1-related early-onset disease, based on one patient without statistical genetic support. It does not establish the broader claim that Christchurch is protective compared with ApoE3. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Both CETSA and BiTSA are effective methods for assessing the thermal stability of ApoE isoforms and variants.

    “In this study, we demonstrate that both CETSA 42 and the BiTSA 45 assay are effective methods for assessing the thermal stability of ApoE isoforms and variants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [42] 2013, Monitoring drug target engagement in cells and tissues using the cellular thermal shift assay. Science (New York, N.Y source
    • cites [45] source

      The cited paper’s Material and Methods sections describe propofol sedation and fMRI analysis, not assays of ApoE thermal stability. Searches for CETSA, BiTSA, and ApoE in our full-text copy found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    ApoE3_R145C and ApoE3_Christchurch did not impact stability, indicating these mutations likely cause their effect due to other properties such as receptor or heparin binding.

    “Of interest also are the variants that did not impact stability in either variant namely ApoE3_R145C and ApoE3_Christchurch which indicate that these mutations are likely causing their effect due to other properties such as receptor or heparin binding 35 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] source

      The passage on APOE binding (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) reports reduced receptor binding and the lowest heparin-binding ability for ApoE3 Christchurch, supporting that proposed mechanism. Our copy does not establish that Christchurch leaves protein stability unchanged, and the searched passages provide no corresponding stability or binding finding for ApoE3_R145C. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Endogenous mouse ApoE exhibits a melting temperature comparable to human ApoE3, while monkey ApoE melts at a temperature similar to ApoE2.

    “endogenous mouse ApoE exhibited a melting temperature comparable to human ApoE3, while monkey ApoE melted at a temperature similar to that of ApoE2 [F (6, 23) = 7.453 (post-hoc tukeys ApoE4 to Monkey p=0.0045)].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    R114C showed a modest but significant stabilizing effect in ApoE3 but not ApoE4.

    “R114C showed a modest but significant stabilizing effect in ApoE3 but not ApoE4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The magnitude of the ApoE3-ApoE4 stability difference is the same in mouse and human brain contexts, but the absolute Tm values differ.

    “while the delta between ApoE3 and ApoE4 is the same in both contexts, the absolute values are different”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Some mutations had consistent effects on ApoE stability regardless of isoform backbone (e.g., R25C), while others showed striking isoform-dependent effects (e.g., L28P, R114C, E96K).

    “Interestingly, some mutations had consistent effects on ApoE stability regardless of isoform backbone (e.g., R25C), while others showed striking isoform-dependent effects (e.g., L28P, R114C, E96K).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Variants affecting helix 1 (R25C and L28P) and the C-terminal domain (R251G and Jacksonville) altered thermal stability, whereas variants in other regions showed more variable effects.

    “Variants affecting helix 1, such as R25C and L28P, and the C-terminal domain, R251G and Jacksonville, altered thermal stability, whereas variants in other regions showed more variable effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    ApoE contains numerous hydrophobic residues on its surface involved in lipid binding, which can interact with hydrophobic dyes even in the native state, confounding the interpretation of thermal shift data.

    “Furthermore, ApoE contains numerous hydrophobic residues on its surface that are involved in lipid binding, which can interact with hydrophobic dyes even in the native state, confounding the interpretation of thermal shift data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because both monkey and mouse ApoE have arginine at position 112, the thermal stability of ApoE is linked to whole protein domain interactions rather than individual amino acid differences alone.

    “Given that both monkey and mouse ApoE have an arginine at position 112, this suggests that the thermal stability of the protein is linked to whole protein domain interactions rather than individual amino acid differences alone, as we expected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The temperature at which proteins aggregate or become insoluble is influenced by multiple factors beyond intrinsic thermodynamic stability, including protein concentration, aggregation propensity, and interactions with other cellular and media components.

    “which is influenced by multiple factors beyond intrinsic thermodynamic stability, including protein concentration, aggregation propensity, and interactions with other cellular and media components.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Our analysis began with ApoE from human brain tissue, establishing the physiological relevance of our findings before moving to higher-throughput cellular systems.

    “A key strength of this study is that our analysis began with ApoE from human brain tissue, establishing the physiological relevance of our findings before moving to higher-throughput cellular systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The local electrostatic environment around residues 96 and 114 differs meaningfully between ApoE3 and ApoE4, likely as a consequence of the ApoE4-specific domain interaction driven by Arg112.

    “In contrast the isoform-specific response suggests that the local electrostatic environment around residues 96 and 114 differ meaningfully between the two isoforms, likely as a consequence of the ApoE4-specific domain interaction driven by Arg112 57 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] 2017, Atomistic Insights into Structural Differences between E3 and E4 Isoforms of Apolipoprotein E, Biophys J source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Thermal stability assays (CETSA and BiTSA) measure the temperature at which proteins aggregate or become insoluble.

    “These assays measure the temperature at which proteins aggregate or become insoluble”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A change in thermal stability can be interpreted as evidence of altered conformational and structural stability.

    “It is important to note that a change in thermal stability can be interpreted as evidence of altered conformational and structural stability”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All animal experiments were approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Subcommittee on Research Animal Care following NIH guidelines.

    “All animal experiments were approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Subcommittee on Research Animal Care following the guidelines set forth by the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (no.2006n000178).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) scores were used to assess per-residue confidence, with scores above 70 considered reliable for structural interpretation.

    “Predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) scores were used to assess per-residue confidence, with scores above 70 considered reliable for structural interpretation, as recommended.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All animal procedures were approved by the CHOP Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

    “All animal procedures were approved by the CHOP Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sequence of all plasmids was confirmed by rapid plasmid sequencing at the Massachusetts General Hospital DNA Core.

    “The sequence of all plasmids was confirmed by rapid plasmid sequencing at the Massachusetts General Hospital DNA Core.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The N-terminal HiBiT tag does not alter the thermal stability or behavior of ApoE variants.

    “ApoE variants were expressed as fusion proteins containing an N-terminal HiBiT tag 45 (Supplementary Figure 1A-B).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AlphaFold models accurately predict the structural consequences of L28P in ApoE3 and ApoE4.

    “we generated AlphaFold 48 models of APOE3 and APOE4 carrying the L28P mutation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The post-mortem human brain samples from APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 homozygous individuals are comparable except for APOE genotype.

    “we performed CETSA on post-mortem human brain tissue from APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 homozygous individuals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In cells, ApoE is associated with lipids and other binding partners that can modulate the effects of mutations.

    “where ApoE is associated with lipids and other binding partners that may modulate the effects of mutations”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The oligomeric state of ApoE differs between cellular and in vitro conditions.

    “Third, the oligomeric state of ApoE differs between cellular and in vitro conditions”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AlphaFold-predicted structures accurately reflect the structural consequences of the L28P mutation in ApoE3 and ApoE4.

    “AlphaFold model of ApoE3-L28P showing disruption of helix 1 structure”
    “AlphaFold model of ApoE4-L28P showing restoration of helical structure”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Astrocyte species differs between results and figure caption

    Major

    The results describe validation in immortalized human astrocytes, whereas the Figure 2 caption identifies the cells in those panels as mouse immortalized astrocytes.

  • Figure 4 ApoE3 and ApoE4 panel references are reversed

    Minor

    The results direct readers to Figure 4C for an ApoE3 result, but the caption assigns panel C to the ApoE4 backbone; it assigns panel B to ApoE3.

  • CETSA temperature range differs between methods and figure caption

    Minor

    The CETSA method specifies a gradient ending at 62°C, but the Figure 1 caption says the brain lysates were subjected to a gradient ending at 70°C.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Jackson, R. J., Dierksmeier, S., Nishtar, M., Meltzer, J., Balduin, F., Beaumont, B., Fan, Z., Sergienko, E., Olson, S., Jackson, M. R., & Hyman, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Rosemary J.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2026-06-11
OpenAlex
W7164396309
Cited by
0
References
63
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzhimer's san diego
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE isoforms, APOE ε4, APOE3, thermal stability, cellular thermal shift assay, postmortem brain, protein folding, late-onset Alzheimer's disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-31.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-31.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review