The DOI matches its Crossref record.
73. Adiposity and IL-6 in women diagnosed with breast cancer
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one non-randomized controlled trial, a significant effect for coping measured with the Jalowiec Coping Scale was found.
“In one non -randomized controlled trial 61 a significant effect for coping measured with the Jalowiec Coping Scale 80,81 was found.”
From How do mindfulness-based interventions promote coping and self-efficacy in patients with cancer: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative data (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roberts-Wolfe, D., Sacchet, M., Hastings, E., Roth, H., & Britton, W. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00015 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Witek-Janusek, L., & Mathews, H. L.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Mathews, Herbert L.
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 22-23
- ISSN
- 0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028718077
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Keywords
- childhood adversity, breast cancer, adiposity, interleukin-6, inflammation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, physical threats, developmental pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
