Cited by 214Gut microbiota and healthAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dysbiosis of microbiome and probiotic treatment in a genetic model of autism spectrum disorders

Tabouy, Laure, Getselter, Dimitry, Ziv, Oren, Karpuj, Marcela, Tabouy, Timothée, Lukic, Iva, Maayouf, Rasha, Werbner, Nir, Ben-Amram, Hila, Nuriel-Ohayon, Meital, Koren, Omry, Elliott, Evan·2018·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Recent studies have determined that the microbiome has direct effects on behavior, and may be dysregulated in neurodevelopmental conditions. Considering that neurodevelopmental conditions, such as autism, have a strong genetic etiology, it is necessary to understand if genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as Shank3, can influence the gut microbiome, and if probiotics can be a therapeutic tool. In this study, we have identified dysregulation of several genera and species of bacteria in the gut and colon of both male and female Shank3 KO mice. L. reuteri, a species with decreased relative abundance in the Shank3 KO mice, positively correlated with the expression of gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor subunits in the brain. Treatment of Shank3 KO mice with L. reuteri induced an attenuation of unsocial behavior specifically in male Shank3 mice, and a decrease in repetitive behaviors in both male and female Shank3 KO mice. In addition, L. reuteri treatment affected GABA receptor gene expression and protein levels in multiple brain regions. This study identifies bacterial species that are sensitive to an autism-related mutation, and further suggests a therapeutic potential for probiotic treatment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.015

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–213 of 213

Metadata

Authors
Tabouy, L., Getselter, D., Ziv, O., Karpuj, M., Tabouy, T., Lukic, I., Maayouf, R., Werbner, N., Ben-Amram, H., Nuriel-Ohayon, M., Koren, O., & Elliott, E.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
Corresponding author
Elliott, Evan
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
73
Pages
310-319
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803873435
Cited by
214
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, gut dysbiosis, probiotics, Shank3 knockout mice, Lactobacillus reuteri, repetitive behavior, sex differences, neurodevelopmental disorders
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Microfilament Proteins, Models, Genetic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Receptors, GABA, Mice, Knockout, Probiotics, Mice, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review