The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Chat(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finding answers to this question is urgent as LLMs are already starting to permeate the academic landscape (10–17).”
From How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science? (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“The use of AI tools in education and scientific publishing, particularly ChatGPT, has sparked widespread debate and controversy across faculty, students, and researchers across the globe (Hill-Yardin et al., 2023).”
From ChatGPT Unveiled: Understanding Perceptions of Academic Integrity in Higher Education - A Qualitative Approach (2025) · cites this paper as Hill-Yardin et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?
O’Connor, S., & ChatGPT (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537 · Cited by 585
Manohar, N., & Prasad, S. S. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.34616 · Cited by 63
O’Connor, S. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103572 · Cited by 40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Abd-alrazaq, A., AlSaad, R., Alhuwail, D., Ahmed, A., Healy, P. M., Latifi, S., Aziz, S., Damseh, R., Alabed Alrazak, S., & Sheikh, J. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48291 · Cited by 722
Yu, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712 · Cited by 409
“This technology is not only profoundly influencing and shaping the production, life, and communication modes of the entire society, but also fundamentally reshaping society and humanity itself (Hill-Yardin et al., 2023).”
BackgroundChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., Kleesiek, J., & Egger, J. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108013 · Cited by 452
Yu, H. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289 · Cited by 225
RetractedGarg, R. K., Urs, V. L., Agrawal, A. A., Chaudhary, S. K., Paliwal, V. K., & Kar, S. K. (2023) · Health Promotion Perspectives · doi:10.34172/hpp.2023.22 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill-Yardin, E. L., Hutchinson, M. R., Laycock, R., & Spencer, S. J.
- Affiliations
- ARC Centre for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Spencer, Sarah J.
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 152-154
- ISSN
- 0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4322743583
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 87
- FWCI
- 63.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, AI-assisted assessment, curriculum and pedagogy, AI regulation, AI ethics, social construction of technology, early adopters
- MeSH terms
- Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Publishing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
