Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 274 of the 274 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Biology of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Task Force Report from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Open access
Cooke, Kenneth R., Luznik, Leo, Sarantopoulos, Stefanie, Hakim, Frances T., Jagasia, Madan, Fowler, Daniel H., van den Brink, Marcel R.M., Hansen, John A., Parkman, Robertson, Miklos, David B., Martin, Paul J., Paczesny, Sophie, Vogelsang, Georgia, Pavletic, Steven, Ritz, Jerome, Schultz, Kirk R., Blazar, Bruce R.·2017·Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Abstract

Chronic graft-versus-host disease Blood and marrow transplantation Immune mechanisms Clinical manifestationsA B S T R A C T Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the leading cause of late, nonrelapse mortality and disability in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients and a major obstacle to improving outcomes.The biology of chronic GVHD remains enigmatic, but understanding the underpinnings of the immunologic mechanisms responsible for the initiation and progression of disease is fundamental to developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.The goals of this task force review are as follows:• Summarize the current state of the science regarding pathogenic mechanisms of chronic GVHD and crit- ical knowledge gaps.• Develop working hypotheses/overriding concepts for chronic GVHD development.• Define the usefulness of current preclinical models to test working hypotheses and ultimately discover and develop new therapeutic strategies.• Identify shortcomings of preclinical models, and define criteria for the creation of additional models to address these limitations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.023

Cites

274 of 274 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–274 of 274

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Cooke, K. R., Luznik, L., Sarantopoulos, S., Hakim, F. T., Jagasia, M., Fowler, D. H., van den Brink, M. R. M., Hansen, J. A., Parkman, R., Miklos, D. B., Martin, P. J., Paczesny, S., Vogelsang, G., Pavletic, S., Ritz, J., Schultz, K. R., & Blazar, B. R.
Venue
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
211-234
ISSN
1083-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528448343
Cited by
472
References
274
FWCI
28.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.