Cerebral processing of food-related stimuli: effects of fasting and gender
Abstract
To maintain nutritional homeostasis, external food-related stimuli have to be evaluated in relation to the internal states of hunger or satiety. To examine the neural circuitry responsible for integration of internal and external determinants of human eating behaviour, brain responses to visual and complex gustatory food-related stimuli were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 18 healthy non-smokers (10 women, 8 men). Each individual was studied on two occasions, the order of which was counterbalanced; after eating as usual and after 24 h fasting. Raised plasma free fatty acids and lower insulin and leptin concentrations confirmed that participants fasted as requested. When fasted, participants reported more hunger, nervousness and worse mood and rated the visual (but not gustatory) food-related stimuli as more pleasant. The effect of fasting on hunger was stronger in women than in men. No circuitry was identified as differentially responsive in fasting compared to satiety to both visual and gustatory food-related stimuli. The left insula response to the gustatory stimuli was stronger during fasting. The inferior occipito-temporal response to visual food-related stimuli also tended to be stronger during fasting. The responses in the occipito-temporal cortex to visual and in the insula to gustatory stimuli were stronger in women than in men. There was no interaction between gender and fasting. In conclusion, food reactivity in modality-specific sensory cortical areas is modulated by internal motivational states. The stronger reactivity to external food-related stimuli in women may be explored as a marker of gender-related susceptibility to eating disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another experiment found greater response in primary gustatory cortex and reward regions in response to intake of food after caloric deprivation versus a non-deprivation condition.
“Another experiment found that there was greater response in the primary gustatory cortex (anterior insula, frontal operculum) and regions associated with reward (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex) in response to intake of food (chocolate milk, chicken soup) after caloric deprivation versus a non-deprivation condition”
From Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods (2013) · cites this paper as Uher et al., 2006
The null effects in these fMRI experiments may be due to small samples (Ns = 10 to 20).
“potentially because of the small samples used in these studies (Ns = 10 to 20).”
From Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods (2013) · cites this paper as Uher et al., 2006
Null effects also emerged in fMRI experiments on caloric deprivation and food image response.
“though null effects also emerged (Siep et al., 2009; Uher et al., 2006)”
From Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods (2013) · cites this paper as Uher et al., 2006
Food deprivation increases activation of visual (occipitotemporal cortex) and gustatory (insular cortex) sensory processing areas by the sight and taste of food.
“Comparing the fasted vs. fed state, food deprivation increased activation of visual (occipitotemporal cortex) and gustatory (insular cortex) sensory processing areas by the sight and taste of food”
From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [181]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 258
- Authors
- Uher, R., Treasure, J., Heining, M., Brammer, M. J., & Campbell, I. C.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Uher, Rudolf
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-119
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999909982
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (065862)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- food-related stimuli, fasting, hunger, satiety, gender differences, eating behaviour, insula, occipitotemporal cortex, gustatory processing, eating disorders, nutritional homeostasis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Appetite Regulation, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Eating, Fasting, Female, Food, Humans, Hunger, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Photic Stimulation, Sex Factors, Taste, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review