Cited by 258Regulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Cerebral processing of food-related stimuli: effects of fasting and gender

Uher, Rudolf, Treasure, Janet, Heining, Maike, Brammer, Michael J., Campbell, Iain C.·2006·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

To maintain nutritional homeostasis, external food-related stimuli have to be evaluated in relation to the internal states of hunger or satiety. To examine the neural circuitry responsible for integration of internal and external determinants of human eating behaviour, brain responses to visual and complex gustatory food-related stimuli were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 18 healthy non-smokers (10 women, 8 men). Each individual was studied on two occasions, the order of which was counterbalanced; after eating as usual and after 24 h fasting. Raised plasma free fatty acids and lower insulin and leptin concentrations confirmed that participants fasted as requested. When fasted, participants reported more hunger, nervousness and worse mood and rated the visual (but not gustatory) food-related stimuli as more pleasant. The effect of fasting on hunger was stronger in women than in men. No circuitry was identified as differentially responsive in fasting compared to satiety to both visual and gustatory food-related stimuli. The left insula response to the gustatory stimuli was stronger during fasting. The inferior occipito-temporal response to visual food-related stimuli also tended to be stronger during fasting. The responses in the occipito-temporal cortex to visual and in the insula to gustatory stimuli were stronger in women than in men. There was no interaction between gender and fasting. In conclusion, food reactivity in modality-specific sensory cortical areas is modulated by internal motivational states. The stronger reactivity to external food-related stimuli in women may be explored as a marker of gender-related susceptibility to eating disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.12.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 258

Authors
Uher, R., Treasure, J., Heining, M., Brammer, M. J., & Campbell, I. C.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Uher, Rudolf
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
169
Issue
1
Pages
111-119
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999909982
Cited by
258
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (065862)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food-related stimuli, fasting, hunger, satiety, gender differences, eating behaviour, insula, occipitotemporal cortex, gustatory processing, eating disorders, nutritional homeostasis
MeSH terms
Adult, Appetite Regulation, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Eating, Fasting, Female, Food, Humans, Hunger, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Photic Stimulation, Sex Factors, Taste, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review