Fornix and retrosplenial contribution to a hippocampo-thalamic circuit underlying conditional learning
Abstract
Rats with combined bilateral lesions of the retrosplenial cortex and the fornix or rats with unilateral lesions to the anterior thalamus and the hippocampus, made in opposite hemispheres (disconnection preparation), and combined with unilateral damage of the retrosplenial cortex in either hemisphere, were tested on a spatial-visual conditional learning task in which they learned arbitrary associations between stimuli and the scene in which they were embedded. All experimental groups were impaired in comparison with normal animals. The more severe deficits occurred when (1) both the fornix and the retrosplenial cortex were damaged bilaterally thus depriving the hippocampus both from subcortical interactions via the fornix and retrosplenial-mediated interactions and (2) when, in the crossed lesion preparation, the unilateral retrosplenial lesion was made in the hemisphere with the intact hippocampus, again because this lesion would be maximally disconnecting the hippocampus from functional interaction with the anterior thalamic nucleus and retrosplenial-mediated input.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The additive effects of anterior thalamic and retrosplenial cortex lesions support the cingulum/fornix disconnection study by emphasising differences in the functional contributions of the two tracts to spatial learning and memory.
“These additive effects (Dumont et al., 2010) support the results of the cingulum/fornix disconnection study (Fig. 7) by emphasising differences in the functional contributions of these two major tracts to spatial learning and memory.”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Dumont et al., 2010
A complex disconnection procedure found evidence that anterior thalamic lesions and retrosplenial cortex lesions have additive effects, implying different contributions to hippocampal function.
“While this concern is difficult to disprove, a complex disconnection procedure (Dumont et al., 2010) found evidence that anterior thalamic lesions and retrosplenial cortex lesions have additive effects, implying different contributions to hippocampal function.”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Dumont et al., 2010
Cites
What does the retrosplenial cortex do?
Vann, S. D., Aggleton, J. P., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2733 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum.
McDonald, R. J., & White, N. M. (1993) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.107.1.3 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction
Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
“While this concern is difficult to disprove, a complex disconnection procedure (Dumont et al., 2010) found evidence that anterior thalamic lesions and retrosplenial cortex lesions have additive effects, implying different contributions to hippocampal function.”
- Authors
- Dumont, J. R., Petrides, M., & Sziklas, V.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sziklas, Viviane
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088158836
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- fornix, retrosplenial cortex, hippocampus, anterior thalamic nuclei, conditional learning, bilateral lesions, hippocampal lesions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Psychological, Electrolysis, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Ibotenic Acid, Functional Laterality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Reward, Maze Learning, Anterior Thalamic Nuclei, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review