Cited by 896Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum.

McDonald, Robert J., White, Norman M.·1993·Behavioral Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.107.1.3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other frameworks that emphasize multiple parallel memory systems in the brain allow behavioral flexibility.

    “Other frameworks that emphasize multiple parallel memory systems in the brain (e.g., Gruber & McDonald, 2012; McDonald & White, 1993; White, 1996) also allow behavioral flexibility.”

    From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as McDonald & White, 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, R. J., & White, N. M.
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1993
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
3-22
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W4232217111
Cited by
885
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 23
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
memory systems, hippocampus, amygdala, dorsal striatum, memory dissociation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review