Cited by 6Memory and Neural MechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Multisensory interaction mediates the social transmission of avoidance in rats: Dissociation from social transmission of fear

Masuda, Akira, Narikiyo, Kimiya, Someya, Nami, Aou, Shuji·2013·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Social interaction enables animals to transmit various types of sensory information that can modulate learned avoidance behavior and fear responses, which are important to survival. We previously reported that, under a passive avoidance paradigm, avoidance behavior is facilitated when a rat observes another rat (demonstrator) receiving a shock when performing a specific behavior. However, the sensory mechanisms underlying this 'social facilitation of avoidance' are not well understood. The present study examined the role of sensory pathways for social transmission of avoidance, focusing on the olfactory and visual systems. The olfactory ability of observer rats was blocked by an intranasal application of ZnSO4, and their visual ability was blocked by an opaque partition placed between observer and demonstrator rats. We found that blocking either olfactory or visual input drastically diminished the social transmission of avoidance. Interestingly the social transmission of fear responses remained intact even when olfactory or visual information was blocked. These results indicate that the social transmission of avoidance is mediated not by any single sensory modality but by multisensory interaction in rats, suggesting a distinct sensory mechanism from that underlying the social transmission of fear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.011

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Masuda et al. showed that social learning of avoidance depends on both visual and olfactory cues.

    “Further, Masuda et al showed that social learning of avoidance depends on both visual and olfactory cues.174”
  • Responses of observers can be elicited by rapid, random body movements, as well as the lack of movement.

    “Responses of the observers can be also elicited by rapid, random body movements, 152,174 as well as the lack of movement.175”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masuda, A., Narikiyo, K., Someya, N., & Aou, S.
Affiliations
  • Kyushu Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
252
Pages
334-338
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035235091
Cited by
6
References
26
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
multisensory interaction, olfactory input, visual input, zinc sulfate, passive avoidance, observational learning, rats
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Astringents, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Electroshock, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Odorants, Smell, Social Behavior, Rats, Wistar, Zinc Sulfate, Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review