Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting cognitive decline with deep learning of brain metabolism and amyloid imaging

Open access
Choi, Hongyoon, Jin, Kyong Hwan·2018·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

ABSTRACT For effective treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is important to identify subjects who are most likely to exhibit rapid cognitive decline. We aimed to develop an automatic image interpretation system based on a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) which can accurately predict future cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients using flurodeoxyglucose and florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET). PET images of 139 patients with AD, 171 patients with MCI and 182 normal subjects obtained from Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database were used. Deep CNN was trained using 3‐dimensional PET volumes of AD and normal controls as inputs. Manually defined image feature extraction such as quantification using predefined region‐of‐interests was unnecessary for our approach. Furthermore, it used minimally processed images without spatial normalization which has been commonly used in conventional quantitative analyses. Cognitive outcome of MCI subjects was predicted using this network. The prediction accuracy of the conversion of mild cognitive impairment to AD was compared with the conventional feature‐based quantification approach. Accuracy of prediction (84.2%) for conversion to AD in MCI patients outperformed conventional feature‐based quantification approaches. ROC analyses revealed that performance of CNN‐based approach was significantly higher than that of the conventional quantification methods (p < 0.05). Output scores of the network were strongly correlated with the longitudinal change in cognitive measurements (p < 0.05). These results show the feasibility of deep learning as a practical tool for developing predictive neuroimaging biomarker.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.02.017

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Choi, H., & Jin, K. H.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
344
Pages
103-109
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2609761721
Cited by
256
References
31
FWCI
19.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting cognitive decline with deep learning of brain metabolism and amyloid imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.02.017
The paper
Choi, H., & Jin, K. H. (2018). Predicting cognitive decline with deep learning of brain metabolism and amyloid imaging. Behavioural Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.02.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.