Cited by 32Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMind wandering and attentionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Electrophysiological correlates of spontaneous mind wandering in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Bozhilova, Natali, Cooper, Ruth, Kuntsi, Jonna, Asherson, Philip, Michelini, Giorgia·2020·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

We recently hypothesised that increased spontaneous mind wandering (MW-S) reflects a core process underlying attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Previous studies show that individuals with ADHD and neurotypical individuals with increased MW-S display similar cognitive-performance and electrophysiological (EEG) impairments in attentional processes. However, the cognitive-EEG markers associated with increased MW-S in ADHD remain poorly understood. We therefore investigated such markers in a sample of 69 sex- and age-matched adults with ADHD and 29 controls during the Sustained Attention to Response Task. We compared task performance and EEG measures (P3, time-frequency brain-oscillations) of attentional processes between groups, and examined their association with a validated self-report questionnaire of MW-S. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that MW-S and ADHD diagnosis relate to the same cognitive-EEG impairments using a hierarchical regression model. Compared to controls, adults with ADHD showed attenuations in P3, event-related alpha and beta suppression during response inhibition (No-Go trials), and theta power activations during response execution (Go trials), as well as increased reaction time variability and more commission/omission errors. MW-S was also continuously associated with most cognitive-EEG measures related to ADHD. The hierarchical regressions on measures associated with both ADHD diagnosis and MW-S showed that MW-S did not explain additional variance in the cognitive-EEG markers (except for beta suppression) beyond ADHD diagnosis, and vice versa. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis that ADHD diagnosis and MW-S share common neural deficits, and that MW-S may reflect a core symptom of the disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112632

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased RTV has been shown to be a behavioral index of increased mind-wandering in adults with ADHD.

    “Furthermore, increased RTV has been shown to be a behavioral index of increased mind-wandering in adults with ADHD (71–73), and has been associated with abnormalities in “switching off” the neural correlates of mind-wandering, the default mode network (DMN) (74) during task performance in children and adults with ADHD (19, 20).”

    From Differential effects of a single dose of Lisdexamfetamine and Guanfacine on cognitive function in children with ADHD (2025) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports a novel association between increased spontaneous mind-wandering and RTV in a sample of adults with and without ADHD. It does not establish RTV as an index of mind-wandering specifically within the ADHD group: the association was assessed across the entire sample, and the Results (Analysis 3; page unavailable) found that mind-wandering did not explain additional RTV variance after ADHD status was included. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. [4]Mowlem F.D. Agnew-Blais J. Pingault J.B. Asherson P. Evaluating a scale of excessive mind wandering among males and females with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from a population sample Sci. Rep. 9 1 2019 3071 30816143 PMC6395591
  2. [5]Bozhilova N.S. Michelini G. Kuntsi J. Asherson P. Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 92 2018 464 476 30036553 PMC6525148
  3. [6]Callard F. Smallwood J. Golchert J. Margulies D. The era of the wandering mind? Twenty-first century research on self-generated mental activity Front. Psychol. 4 2013 891 24391606 PMC3866909
  4. [7]Mason M.F. Norton M.I. van Horn J.D. Wegner D.M. Grafton S.T. Macrae C.N. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought Science 315 5810 2008 393 395 PMC1821121 17234951
  5. [8]Smallwood J. Tipper C. Brown K. Baird B. Engen H. Michaels J. Grafton S. Schooler J.W. Escaping the here and now: evidence for a role of the default mode network in perceptually decoupled thought Neuroimage 69 2013 120 125 23261640
  6. [9]Christoff K. Gordon A.M. Smallwood J. Smith R. Schooler J.W. Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive contributions to mind wandering Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 21 2009 8719 8724 19433790 PMC2689035
  7. [10]Loo S.K. Lenartowicz A. Makeig S. Research review: use of EEG biomarkers in child psychiatry research–current state and future directions Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 57 1 2016 4 17 26099166 PMC4689673
  8. [11]Kam J.W. Dao J. Farley K. Fitzpatrick J. Smallwood J. Schooler J.W. Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23 2 2011 460 470 20146593
  9. [12]Barron E. Riby L.M. Greer J. Smallwood J. Absorbed in thought: the effect of mind wandering on the processing of relevant and irrelevant events Psychol. Sci. 22 5 2011 596 601 21460338
  10. [13]Riby L.M. Smallwood J. Gunn V.P. Mind wandering and retrieval from episodic memory: a pilot event-related potential study Psychol. Rep. 102 3 2008 805 818 18763452
  11. [14]Smallwood J. Beach E. Schooler J.W. Handy T.C. Going AWOL in the brain: mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events J. Cognit. Neurosci. 20 3 2008 458 469 18004943
  12. [15]Villena-González M. López V. Rodríguez E. Orienting attention to visual or verbal/auditory imagery differentially impairs the processing of visual stimuli Neuroimage 132 2016 71 78 26876471
  13. [16]Kirmizi-Alsan E. Bayraktaroglu Z. Gurvit H. Keskin Y.H. Emre M. Demiralp T. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention Brain Res. 1104 1 2006 114 128 16824492
  14. [17]Szuromi B. Czobor P. Komlósi S. Bitter I. P300 deficits in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis Psychol. Med. 41 7 2011 1529 1538 10.1017/S0033291710001996 20961477 · DOI
  15. [18]Michelini G. Cheung C.H. Kitsune V. Brandeis D. Banaschewski T. McLoughlin G. The etiological structure of cognitive-neurophysiological impairments in ADHD in adolescence and young adulthood J. Atten. Disord. 2018 1087054718771191 PMC7750664 29720024
  16. [19]Fisher T. Aharon-Peretz J. Pratt H. Disregulation of response inhibition in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an ERP study Clin. Neurophysiol. 122 12 2011 2390 2399 21665533
  17. [20]Janssen T.W.P. Geladé K. van Mourik R. Maras A. Oosterlaan J. An ERP source imaging study of the oddball task in children with attention Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder Clin. Neurophysiol. 127 2 2016 1351 1357 26613651
  18. [21]Chronaki G. Soltesz F. Benikos N. Sonuga-Barke E.J.S. An electrophysiological investigation of reinforcement effects in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: dissociating cue sensitivity from down-stream effects on target engagement and performance Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 28 2017 12 20 29080475 PMC6987869
  19. [22]James S.N. Cheung C.H. Rommel A.S. McLoughlin G. Brandeis D. Banaschewski T. Peripheral hypoarousal but not preparation-vigilance impairment endures in ADHD remission J. Atten. Disord. 2017 1087054717698813 PMC5617106 28363258
  20. [24]Smallwood J. Penetrating the fog of the decoupled mind: the effects of visual salience in the sustained attention to response task Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67 1 2013 32 40 23458549
  21. [25]Baldwin C.L. Roberts D.M. Barragen D. Lee J.D. Lerner N. Higgins S. Detecting and quantifying mind wandering during simulated driving Front. Hum. Neurosci. 1 2017 406 PMC5550411 28848414
  22. [27]Arnau S. Loeffner C. Rummel J. Hagemann D. Wascher E. Schubert A.L. Electrophysiological signature of mind wandering bioRxiv 2019 819805
  23. [29]van Son D. De Blasio F.M. Fogarty J.S. Angelidis A. Barry R.J. Putman P. Frontal EEG theta/beta ratio during mind wandering episodes Biol. Psychol. 140 2019 19 27 30458199
  24. [30]Baird B. Smallwood J. Lutz A. Schooler J.W. The decoupled mind: mind wandering disrupts cortical phase-locking to perceptual events J. Cognit. Neurosci. 18 5 2014 158 24742189
  25. [31]Jensen O. Mazaheri A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4 2010 186 21119777 PMC2990626
  26. [32]Loo S.K. Hale T.S. Macion J. Hanada G. McGough J.J. McCracken J.T. Smalley S.L. Cortical activity patterns in ADHD during arousal, activation and sustained attention Neuropsychologia 47 10 2009 2114 2119 19393254 PMC2785488
  27. [33]Loo S.K. Smalley S.L. Preliminary report of familial clustering of EEG measures in ADHD Am. J. Med. Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 147B 1 2008 107 109 17579367
  28. [34]Lenartowicz A. Lu S. Rodriguez C. Lau E. P Walshaw P. D McCracken J.T. Alpha desynchronization and frontoparietal connectivity during spatial working memory encoding deficits in ADHD: a simultaneous EEGfMRI study Neuroimage Clin. 11 2016 210 223 26955516 PMC4761724
  29. [35]Hasler R. Perroud N. Meziane H.B. Herrmann F. Prada P. Giannakopoulos P. Deiber M.-P. Attention-related EEG markers in adult ADHD Neuropsychologia 87 2016 120 133 27178310
  30. [36]Mazaheri A. Coffey-Corina S. Mangun G.R. Bekker E.M. Berry A.S. Corbett B.A. Functional disconnection of frontal cortex and visual cortex in attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder Dev. Inhibitory Control Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder 67 7 2010 617 623 20060100
  31. [37]Michelini G. Kitsune V. Vainieri I. Hosang G.M. Brandeis D. Asherson P. Kuntsi J. Shared and disorder-specific event-related brain oscillatory markers of attentional dysfunction in ADHD and bipolar disorder Brain Topogr. 31 4 2018 672 689 29417321 PMC5999167
  32. [38]Lenartowicz Agatha Mazaheri Ali Jensen Ole Loo Sandra K. Aberrant modulation of brain oscillatory activity and attentional impairment in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 3 1 2018 19 29 29397074 PMC5801762
  33. [39]ter Huurne N. Lozano-Soldevilla D. Onnink M. Kan C. Buitelaar J. Jensen O. Diminished modulation of preparatory sensorimotor mu rhythm predicts attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder severity Psychol. Med. 47 11 2017 1947 1956 28290271
  34. [40]I. Vainieri, G. Michelini, N. Adamo, C.H.M. Cheung, A. Asherson, J. Kuntsi, (under review). Event-related brain oscillatory and ex-Gaussian markers of remission and persistence of ADHD. PMC8842193 32611469
  35. [43]Carriere J.S. Seli P. Smilek D. Wandering in both mind and body: individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting Canad. J. Exp. Psychol 67 1 2013 19 23458548
  36. [44]Seli P. Cheyne J.A. Xu M. Purdon C. Smilek D. Motivation, intentionaloity, and mind wandering: implications for assessments of task-unrelated thought J. Exp. Psychol. Learning Memory Cogn. 41 5 2015 1417 1425 25730306
  37. [45]Delorme A. Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis J. Neurosci. Methods 134 1 2004 9 21 15102499
  38. [47]Kirschner A. Kam J.W.Y. Handy T. Ward L. Differential synchronization in default and task-specific networks of the human brain Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6 2012 139 22661936 PMC3356872
  39. [48]Luck S. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique Vol. 1 2005 the MIT Press MA
  40. [49]Leroy A. Petit G. Zarka D. Cebolla A. M Palmero-Soler E. Strul J. EEG dynamics and neural generators in implicit navigational image processing in adults with ADHD Neuroscience 373 2018 92 105 29343456
  41. [50]Tallon-Baudry C. Bertrand O. Delpuech C. Pernier J. Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human J. Neurosci. 16 13 1996 4240 8753885 PMC6579008
  42. [51]Makeig S. Debener S. Onton J. Delorme A. Mining event-related brain dynamics Trends Cognit. Sci. 8 5 2004 204 210 15120678
  43. [52]Michelini G. Jurgiel J. Bakolis I. Cheung C.H. Asherson P. Loo S.K. Atypical functional connectivity in adolescents and adults with persistent and remitted ADHD during a cognitive control task Transl. Psychiatry 9 1 2019 137 30979865 PMC6461684
  44. [53]Groom M.J. Cahill J.D. Bates A.T. Jackson G.M. Calton T.G. Liddle P.F. Hollis C. Electrophysiological indices of abnormal error-processing in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 51 1 2010 66 76 19674196
  45. [54]Bickel S. Dias E.C. Epstein M.L. Javitt D.C. Expectancy-related modulations of neural oscillations in continuous performance tasks Neuroimage 62 3 2012 1867 1876 22691613 PMC3429347
  46. [56]Papenberg G. Hämmerer D. Müller V. Lindenberger U. Li S.-C. Lower theta inter-trial phase coherence during performance monitoring is related to higher reaction time variability: a lifespan study Neuroimage 83 2013 912 920 23876249
  47. [57]Mazaheri A. Picton T.W. EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets Cognit. Brain Res. 24 1 2005 81 96 15922161
  48. [58]Van Diepen R.M. Mazaheri A. The caveats of observing inter-trial phase-coherence in cognitive neuroscience Sci. Rep. 8 1 2018 1 9 29445210 PMC5813180
  49. [59]Gao H. Qi M. Zhang Q. Response inhibition is more effortful than response activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence Neuroreport 28 7 2017 404 407 28272263
  50. [60]Mazaheri A. Fassbender C. Coffey-Corina S. Hartanto T.A. Schweitzer J.B. Mangun G.R. Differential oscillatory electroencephalogram between attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder subtypes and typically developing adolescents Dev.Soc. Cogn. Dev. Disorders 76 5 2014 422 429 PMC3972379 24120092
  51. [61]McLoughlin G. Albrecht B. Banaschewski T. Rothenberger A. Brandeis D. Asherson P. Kuntsi J. Electrophysiological evidence for abnormal preparatory states and inhibitory processing in adult ADHD Behav. Brain Funct. 6 1 2010 66 21029446 PMC2988695
  52. [63]Michelini G. Kitsune G.L. Hosang G.M. Asherson P. McLoughlin G. Kuntsi J. Disorder-specific and shared neurophysiological impairments of attention and inhibition in women with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and women with bipolar disorder Psychol. Med. 46 3 2016 493 504 26550924 PMC4697305
  53. [64]Polanía R. Nitsche M.A. Korman C. Batsikadze G. Paulus W. The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance Curr. Biol. 22 14 2012 1314 1318 22683259
  54. [65]McLoughlin Gráinne Albrecht Bjoern Banaschewski Tobias Rothenberger Aribert Brandeis Daniel Asherson Philip Kuntsi Jonna Performance monitoring is altered in adult ADHD: a familial event-related potential investigation Neuropsychologia 47 14 2009 3134 3142 19643116 PMC3776647

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bozhilova, N., Cooper, R., Kuntsi, J., Asherson, P., & Michelini, G.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bozhilova, Natali
  • Asherson, Philip
  • Michelini, Giorgia
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
391
Pages
112632
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023334592
Cited by
32
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre
  • Vifor Pharma
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
spontaneous mind wandering, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, P3, theta power, sustained attention, response inhibition, reaction time variability, omission and commission errors, Sustained Attention to Response Task, adult ADHD
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Self Report, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review