Cited by 11SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmune responses and vaccinationsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Vaccine-induced protection in aging adults and pandemic response

Open access
Schenkelberg, Theodore·2021·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.090

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaccine responses are often lower in elderly adults, especially for hepatitis B, pneumococcal, and influenza vaccinations, and this reduced success is attributed to adaptive immunosenescence.

    “Although vaccination is key to prevent infections, vaccine responses are often found to be lower in elderly adults.In numerous studies, the markedly reduced vaccine success in older adults has been attributed to adaptive immunosenescence.Reduced vaccination success in elderly adults is especially known for hepatitis B, pneumococcal, and influenza vaccinations [22,23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]8. Rondy M., El Omeiri N., Thompson M.G., Leveque A., Moren A., Sullivane S.G. Effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing severe influenza illness among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design case-control studies. J. Infect. 2017 Nov;75(5):381–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.09.010. · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Schenkelberg, T.
Affiliations
Human Immunome Project (US)
Corresponding author
Schenkelberg, Theodore
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
538
Pages
218-220
ISSN
0006-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3104035721
Cited by
11
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
vaccine-induced protection, older adults, pandemic response, COVID-19 vaccines, immunosenescence
MeSH terms
Immunosenescence, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adult, Humans, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review