Cited by 17Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Dung as a potential medium for inter-sexual chemical signaling in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)

Ghosal, Ratna, Seshagiri, P.B., Sukumar, R.·2012·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

Chemical signaling is a prominent mode of male-female communication among elephants, especially during their sexually active periods. Studies on the Asian elephant in zoos have shown the significance of a urinary pheromone (Z7-12:Ac) in conveying the reproductive status of a female toward the opposite sex. We investigated the additional possibility of an inter-sexual chemical signal being conveyed through dung. Sixteen semi-captive adult male elephants were presented with dung samples of three female elephants in different reproductive phases. Each male was tested in 3 separate trials, within an interval of 1-3 days. The trials followed a double-blind pattern as the male and female elephants used in the trials were strangers, and the observer was not aware of the reproductive status of females during the period of bioassays. Males responded preferentially (P<0.005), in terms of higher frequency of sniff, check and place behavior toward the dung of females close to pre-ovulatory period (follicular-phase) as compared to those in post-ovulatory period (luteal-phase). The response toward the follicular phase samples declined over repeated trials though was still significantly higher than the corresponding response toward the non-ovulatory phase in each of the trials performed. This is the first study to show that male Asian elephants were able to distinguish the reproductive phase of the female by possibly detecting a pre-ovulatory pheromone released in dung.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.04.010

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asian elephants can use olfactory cues to determine where food is present and where it is not and to discriminate between dung from females based on reproductive state.

    “Asian elephants can use olfactory cues to determine where food is present and where it is not (Plotnik et al., 2014) and to discrimate between dung from females based on reproductive state (Ghosal et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghosal, R., Seshagiri, P. B., & Sukumar, R.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Corresponding author
Sukumar, R.
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997082226
Cited by
17
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Asian elephant, dung, chemical communication, olfactory cues, estrous cycle, zoo elephants
MeSH terms
Animals, Double-Blind Method, Elephants, Feces, Female, Male, Progesterone, Sex Attractants, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Biomarkers, Estrous Cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review